Whiskyfun
Home
(Current entries)


Whisky Tasting

 
 

Daily Music entries
 
 

Petits billets d'humeur
(in French)

 

 

 
Hi, you're in the Archives, April 2006 - Part 2
       
 
April 2006 - part 1 <--- April 2006 - part 2 ---> May 2006 - part 1
 

April 30, 2006


TASTING - THREE INDIE MORTLACHS
Mortlach 10 yo (40%, MacMalt, 180 bottles, circa 2005) ‘Satisfaction – no collection !’ is what they wrote on the bottle. That’s funny, but I’m not too sure anybody would have thought about collecting young indie Mortlachs, especially at 40% ;-) Colour: gold. Nose: fresh, clean and light, starting on orange cake and honey, developing on lapsang souchong tea and toasted bread and getting then a tad farmy and feinty. Smokier than expected. Uncomplicated but balanced and enjoyable. A perfect breakfast malt? Mouth: sweet, light, rounded but not dull, lacking just a little body. Notes of spearmint, herbal tea, plums, cake again, light breakfast honey. Quite malty as well, too bad it gets a little sluggish after a while. The finish isn’t too long and a tad too cardboardy but the whole is rather good – but don’t try it if you’re in the mood for oomph. 78 points.
Mortlach 12 yo (40%, McNeill, 30 bottles, circa 2005) Colour: gold. Nose: a little discreeter, yet maybe a tad fruitier and more feinty but otherwise it’s quite similar, i.e. very enjoyable. For a double breakfast? Mouth: roughly the same profile as the MacMalt – well, more than roughly, actually. Very, very similar, with maybe a little more body. Just a little. 79 points.
Mortlach 12 yo (46%, Craigellachie Hotel, circa 2005) Colour: straw. Nose: certainly livelier and maltier, with quite some smoke, smoked tea, caramel, resins and dried fruits. Something slightly meaty and mineral at the same time, also grassy (newly cut grass, raw asparagus). Whiffs of mint and aniseed. Mouth: sweet, full-bodied, balanced and compact. Starts on Grand-Marnier liqueur, orange marmalade, liquorice, candy sugar… Goes on with herbal tea and earl grey, plum jam, light caramel. Hints of ripe bananas. Uncomplicated again but quite oomphy and flawless, with a medium long but sweet, creamy and satisfying finish. A tad MOTR but highly sippable. 83 points.

 

MUSIC – Recommended listening - It's Sunday, we go classical. Do they have hits in classical music? Sure, for instance la Callas singing Bizet's Carmen.mp3 (Act I - that must have been in 1961 in Paris, with the French National Radio Orchestra). Maybe it got a little kitsch now but it will put you in a good mood straight off.

 

April 29, 2006


TASTING - TWO PORT ELLENS - OR ONLY ONE?
Port Ellen 22 yo (56.1%, Whisky-Doris, 2006) It seems this one’s been sold out within a few days. Sorry, I’m late… Colour: Cognac. Nose: extremely toffeeish at first nosing, very ‘oloroso’ but the peat and the sherry blend directly – and perfectly – here, creating kind of another dimension. Something like a smoked chocolate (does that exist?) Very, very little rubber or sulphur this time. Develops on (smoked) Smyrna raisins, (smoked) praline, (smoked) strawberry jam, (smoked) balsamic vinegar…
Absolutely brilliant! Keeps developing on dried Chinese mushrooms, dried beef (from the Grisons), dried seaweed (nori but also kelp), with all the ‘coastal cavalry’ behind it (sea air, iodine etc.) Very special and very perfect. Mouth: it’s a bit more classical now, maybe a tad more ‘peat + sherry’ instead of that third dimension I was talking about regarding the nose. The wine is still very present, making this Port Ellen taste a little bit like a finishing (but one that worked excellently). Notes of caramel, toffee, coffee, mulberry jam… Quite some spices as well (clove) and, maybe, something rubbery now. The middle isn’t extremely bold in fact but the finish is rather long, quite big, balanced, peaty and jammy… Lots of pleasure in this one! And the nose was totally stunning. 92 points.
Port Ellen 23 yo 1982 (56.1%, Jumping Jack for Whisky Plus, 130 bottles)
Colour: cognac again. Nose: very, very similar. Maybe a tad stonier but that could come from less breathing. Hey, could it be the same whisky under another label? Mouth: yes, it’s almost the same whisky. Maybe a little more oomph, with something slightly wilder and rougher but otherwise the profile is exactly the same. Maybe they shared a cask – or it was two consecutive casks? (with the same ABV). Right, same rating here (of course): 92 points.

 

MUSIC – Recommended listening: Michelle Shocked and her beautiful voice doing Black widow.mp3 (from her 1988 album Short, Sharp, Shocked - remember 'Anchorage'?). Please, please, buy Michelle Shocked's music.

 

April 28, 2006


TASTING - TWO INDIE 1992 LAGAVULINS
Vanilla Sky (Lagavulin) 13 yo 1992/2006 (53.6%, The Whisky Fair, bourbon hogshead #5341) It’s always very interesting to be able to taste a Lagavulin single cask, as the owner doesn’t bottle any. Colour: straw. Nose: very smoky and quite austere at first nosing, probably less sweet and ‘polished’ than any of the OB’s (the 12yo’s included). Develops on bold notes of cider apples, with something slightly perfumy in the background (musk?) and quite some almond milk.
A very ‘serious’ Lagavulin, controlled and wild at the same time. Notes of Belgian beer (hey, Orval freaks!), wet stones, getting then quite camphory and resinous (maybe a tad soapy), with also something animal (dog). Very good, probably the most ‘unsweet’ Lagavulin I ever had. Mouth: it’s sweeter now, closer to the 12yo OB’s… A certain narrowness but also a great compactness. Notes of Campari, pepper, bitter oranges, lemon sweets… Goes on with hints of kummel and cloves, smoked tea, verbena tea… Maybe a little mint as well. The finish is long, leaving a very persistent earthiness on your tongue and quite some pepper and bitter almonds as well. And a little salt. And a little liquorice. It’s still a bit rough but an excellent example of a ‘raw’ Lagavulin with little wood influence (was I supposed to get vanilla, by the way?). 90 points.
Breath of Islay (Lagavulin) 12 yo 1992/2005 (57.2%, Adelphi, cask #4345)
Colour: straw – yellow. Nose: powerful but a little sweeter than the ‘Vanilla Sky’ at first nosing (notes of orange juice, rubbed orange zest), yet rougher and sharper. It’s more on stones, aspirin, ginger tonic… Develops on wet hay, moss, pine needles (again these superb resinous notes), almond milk… But no cider apples or beer this time. It’ll be hard to decide between these two Lagavulins by other names… Mouth: wow, this one is punchy to say the least! Lots of peat, something very earthy and rooty (gentian spirit), smoked tea, moderately sugared marzipan (the good one), pepper… Really invading! Goes on with a little curry, green tea, lots of crystallized orange zests and marmalade (truckloads, in fact)… It’s not overly complex but so satisfying… And the finish is very long again, perhaps more coating and smokier than the Vanilla Sky’s… Anyway, this one is just as classy – and very, very peaty. 90 points.

 

MUSIC – Recommended listening: after Patti Smith a few days ago, let's have a little Talking Heads. They're doing Give Me Back My Name.mp3 (from the fab Little Creatures, 1985)... The 'intellectual' side of the eighties... Btw, did you know David Byrne was born in Dumbarton, Scotland?

 

April 27, 2006


TASTING - THREE INDIE HIGHLAND PARKS (at 46%...)
Highland Park 16 yo (46%, McNeill, 30 bottles, circa 2005) No vintage on this one, and no explanation about the low number of bottles – as shared cask, I guess. Colour: white wine. Nose: rather fragrant at first nosing, a typical un-sherried Highland Park that smells much younger than 16yo. Whiffs of smoke and quite some flowers, apples and pears, something resinous, marzipan, hints of heather and wet stone… Gets then a little grainy and mashy, on porridge and mashed potatoes… The whole is rather nice but again, seems to lack a little ageing. Mouth: very sweet, with a nice mouth feel. Quite some pink pineapple, fresh walnuts, quince jelly. Gets quite waxy and even resinous. Goes on with apple pie, acacia honey, fresh almonds… I like this palate much better than the nose, in fact. Almost excellent, a very good surprise! And the finish is long, compact, extremely well balanced, on orange marmalade and wax. Again, a great palate. Too bad there was only 30 bottles. 87 points.
Highland Park 15 yo 1990/2005 (46%, The Alchemist) Colour: white wine. Nose: a little sharper and more austere, grassier but more elegant. Quite smoky and very heathery. Cider apples, newly cut grass, a little paraffin. Gets beautifully perfumy after a while, with something that reminds me of L’Air du Temps de Nina Ricci. Clean and elegant, I like it. Mouth: a very ‘natural’ palate, again more austere than the McNeill’s, waxier and much grassier. Even more fresh walnuts and almonds, also marzipan, green tea, butter caramel... Goes on with liquorice, orange marmalade… Really full-bodied, at that. Maybe a tad less balanced than the McNeill’s… The finish is quite as long but more on milk caramel (Werther’s Original)… Another very good Highland Park – and God knows indie HP’s aren’t always ‘top notch’. 87 points.
Highland Park 11 yo 1990 (46%, First Spirits, France) Colour: pale gold. Nose: this one is much fruitier, with quite some freshly squeezed oranges, tangerines and a little passion fruit, getting then quite mashy, almost feinty again (hints of muesli, yoghurt, cider and beer). Rather nice but far from being as elegant s the Alchemist’s. Mouth: we’re in simpler territories here. Grassier, getting a little bitter, with notes of ginger and quite some peat. A certain acridness (lemon zest) but it’s still rather good whisky, probably a little oomphier than both the McNeill’s and the Alchemist’s. The finish is longer as well, more nervous, mostly on bitter oranges. Another one that’s quite good, even if simpler. 84 points.
 
PETE McPEAT AND JACK WASHBACK
 
 

 

MUSIC – JAZZ - Very strongly recommended listening - do you need to make up with 'modern' jazz? Then have a try at the amazing new trio Third Impulse playing Sheba's Hesitation.mp3. So excellent and growing so funny after Darren Johnston's introduction on the trumpet! (I know he's not exactly Clifford Brown's reincarnation but he's really excellent, what do you think Peter?) Anyway, please Third Impulse's music!

 

April 26, 2006


TASTING - TWO NORTH PORTS
North Port 35 yo 1966/2001 (50%, Douglas Laing OMC, 138 bottles)
Colour: gold – amber. Nose: a very aromatic start, on lots of fruit jams (apricot, plums, melon), getting then very camphory and minty. Very nervous considering its age. Goes on with quite some wax polish, old wardrobe, old books, while remaining very fresh and lively. Hints of Virginia tobacco, leather, crystallized oranges, pistachio and olive oil… Gets rather maritime after that, mostly on seaweed.
Hints of diesel oil, linseed oil, a little turpentine, smoked tea. I like it a lot – and there seems to be a little peat in there. Very elegant, at that. Mouth: powerful and creamy, with a rather salty attack. Quite some tannins as expected but this one is far from having gone over the hill. It develops on apricot pie and jam, fudge, roasted peanuts, nougat and gets then very spicy with the usual ‘woody cavalry’: nutmeg, white pepper, cinnamon, ginger… It starts to get a little too drying after a while, though, and especially the finish is quite woody. But it’s a very good old whisky nevertheless. 86 points.
North Port 25 yo 1981/2006 (56.1%, The Whisky Fair, sherry wood, 120 bottles)
Colour: just the same, gold-amber. Nose: even more oomph but it’s also much more chocolaty at first nosing, with different kinds of fruits: raspberries, strawberries. Bold notes of pineapple and coconut liqueurs, raspberry eau-de-vie, Grand-Marnier… Probably less classical than the 35yo, with something that reminds me of Ben Nevis. Again something maritime in the background, even if it’s discreeter here. Quite some apples as well – and apple liqueur (like Saurer Apfel but much better), then coffee liqueur, Guinness, brownies, rum… This one doesn’t keep quiet, but it’s also a little less elegant than its older sibling – on the nose. Mouth: very, very close to the 35 yo now, but it’s less tannic (although it’s still a bit drying) and has a thicker mouth feel. Lots of fruit jams and white pepper, plums, spices (see above), vanilla fudge… Quite hot, in fact… Goes on with dark rum, ‘arranged’ rum (with bananas), dried coconut… A tropical North Port? Lots of body and lots of presence – it still doesn’t keep quiet and keeps improving, getting rounder and more balanced after a while. Great. The finish is rather long, sweet and fruity, mainly on fruit eau-de-vie (tutti frutti), pineapples and rum… Pina Colada? Anyway, it’s excellent, no doubt. 89 points.

 

CRAZY ADS - SPANISH SOUL?

I was in Madrid last week, were I found this amazing old ad (well, a postcard actually) for Vargas anisettes and liqueurs. It is well known that the Spanish soul can be very 'dark' but this is profoundly tenebrous, to say the least... Now, the artwork in itself is really stunning, but I'd really love to know what they had in mind when they came up with this strange theme... Gloomy thoughts? Or was some kind of temperance league behind it?

 

MUSIC – Recommended listening - Let’s have something that sounds nicely churchy – yes, American – today, with the great Susan Tedeschi doing Bob Dylan’s Don’t think twice it’s all right.mp3 Simply beautiful! And please buy Miss Tedeschi’s music!

 

April 25, 2006


MUSIC AND WHISKY INTERVIEW - JUDGE SMITH
It’s not precisely because of the rock opera ‘The fall of the House of Usher’ he composed with ex-Van der Graaf Generator bandmate Peter Hammill that I decided to interview Judge Smith (note to newbies, Usher was also a pioneering whisky blending house) but rather because of his stunning recent works such as ‘Curly's Airships’, an amazing epic ‘songstory’ that blends rock, English chanson, tango, marching bands, Indian music, 1920’s dance music and many other ‘colours’. As somebody put it, it’s ‘probably one of the largest and most ambitious single pieces of rock music ever recorded’ and I’d add that for once, it’s not just balance sheet ambition. Dadaist ambition?
Whiskyfun: Judge, tell us briefly about what you do, music-wise.
Judge Smith: My principal interest is in telling stories using words and music. As for the music itself, I think of it as rock music, but some people might not agree with me, as it often doesn’t sound much like rock music’s supposed to sound. It’s generally agreed that the stuff I do is pretty unusual; it also seems to come out very English, and not very American.
My background is in the underground music scene of the late Sixties. I co-founded the band Van Der Graaf Generator, and one of the things we were interested in at the time was breaking away from the three-minute song-about-lurve format, and standard song structures (verse / chorus / verse / chorus / middle 8 / verse / chorus / chorus). I’ve still written plenty of songs like that over the years (and years - I’m pretty old) but I’ve always had an ongoing ambition to paint with the music on a bigger canvas.
I’ve tried writing stage musicals (several of those), operas, cantata and song-cycle, with different degrees of success, but now I think I have finally developed a form and a technique that allows me to tell real stories with real music in a seamless and integrated way. I call it Songstory.
I have three Songstories at different stages of completion at the moment, but the only example that is actually finished and available is CURLY’S AIRSHIPS. This is an epic work about the R.101 airship disaster of 1930. It’s a double CD involving eighteen featured performers, among whom are three other original members of Van der Graaf Generator: Hugh Banton, David Jackson and respected solo artist Peter Hammill. Also participating are singer Arthur Brown (of The Crazy World), Pete Brown (of Battered Ornaments and Piblokto), Paul Roberts (of The Stranglers), John Ellis, (formerly of The Vibrators and The Stranglers), plus a 1920’s dance band, a classical Tenor, an Indian music ensemble and several cathedral organs.
It was six years in the making and is probably one of the largest and most ambitious single pieces of rock music ever recorded. It’s got its own web site at http://www.curlysairships.com and the work tells the true story of the bizarre events which led to the destruction of the world’s biggest airship, the giant dirigible R.101, on its maiden voyage to India. It’s a tale of the incompetence and arrogance of government bureaucrats, the ruthless ambition of a powerful politician and the moral cowardice of his juniors; a story of inexplicable psychic phenomena, the thoughtless bravery of 1920s aviators and the extraordinary spell cast by the gigantic machines they flew: the giant airships, the most surreal and dreamlike means of transport ever devised.
WF: Which other musicians are you playing with?
Judge: In the last two or three years I’ve got back into occasional gigging, after barely performing in public for twenty years. As a result of this, I became interested in the possibilities of the small group, ‘unplugged’ format, and last year I released an album of my songs, THE FULL ENGLISH accompanied (mainly) by John Ellis on guitar and Michael Ward-Bergeman on piano, organ and accordion. These are two terrific musicians, and the album, despite not being in my beloved Songstory format, is one of the best things I’ve ever done.
THE FULL ENGLISH was released by an Italian record label, Labour Of Love Records, who have also just released a really great DVD of a very special concert I did at Guastala last year. JUDGE SMITH – LIVE IN ITALY, 2005 also features John and Michael, augmented by respected Italian drummer Gigi Cavalli Cocchi and Marco Olivotto on bass. These guys make some great music out of my songs, and the old boy capering around at the front doesn’t disgrace himself too much either.
You can see an extract, get other free downloads, and lots and lots more info about Judgestuff in general, at judge-smith.com.
WF: And which are your other favourite artistes?
Judge: There are so many. Where to start, and how to finish? Little Richard, Conlon Nancarrow, Taraf de Haidouks, Roland Kirk, Oysterband, Vivaldi, Sex Pistols…. I could go on (and on). In terms of influence on my own work, however, I would have to say Frank Zappa and Peter Hammill, though my stuff doesn’t sound anything like theirs (or anything much like the abovementioned worthies, either.)
WF: Which are your current projects?
Judge: I have just completed a Songstory for me to perform with an Alpine Choir from the Italian Dolomites. It’s called THE CLIMBER, and I sing the part of a British mountaineer getting into trouble on the mountains about fifty years ago. It’s about a culture clash between visitors and locals, and the choir will be singing lyrics translated into their own mountain dialect, while I sing in English. The choir are extraordinary, with a completely unique and beautiful sound. It’s a very exciting project for me, but it probably won’t be recorded until next year some time.
Now I’m just starting the next thing; a sort of companion piece set in Spain, working with a flamenco guitarist. I need to keep busy. There’s a lot of music I want to do before I get too decrepit.
Through the Internet, a few more people are finally finding out about my work and getting interested in what I do. There is even an active Judge Smith Yahoo! Discussion Group. This is an open group, currently with over 300 posted messages. It’s completely independent, and has no connection with any record company, or with me (I'm not even a signed-up member.) However, it's full of lively comment and debate, and I can recommend a visit to anyone interested in my stuff.
WF: When did you start enjoying whisk(e)y? Are there any musical memories you particularly associate with that moment?
Judge: For about twenty years I drank increasingly large amounts of ordinary supermarket blended whisky, or ‘cooking scotch’ as I called it. I have a slightly sweet tooth, and I’m sorry to have to admit that I drank it with a mixer. However, rather than ginger ale or coke, I always took it with tonic (no ice). To my taste, a good quality tonic water with quinine is a great partner for whisky; it makes an astringent, slightly bitter and most refreshing tipple. I was always very surprised that no one else seemed to drink it except me.
However, in the end, I found I liked it rather too much, and these days I stick to wine, unless someone sticks a glass of malt in my hand.
WF: What’s your most memorable whisky?
Judge: Someone gave me a dram of something quite extraordinary once. Can’t remember what it was called; ‘The Auld Glen McSporan Special Tartan Reserve’ or something like that? Sorry. But it was thick and almost sweet, and drinking it was like…was like?…like maybe Milla Jovovich slipping down your throat wearing velvet pyjamas.
WF: Do you have one, or several favourite whiskies?
Judge: As regards proper malt whisky, not the very dry, strong-tasting types. Something smooth and mild and paid for by someone else. (Cheap? I’m not cheap. I’m just a musician.)
WF: Are there whiskies you don’t like?
Judge: Whisky mixed with water.
WF: By the way, music and whisky are often though of as being male preserves. Should girls play guitars, should girls drink whisky?
Judge: Female rock musicians are a wonderful thing. Every band would benefit from having a girl member. Their playing has an entirely different vibe, and they always bring something new and special to the music. They can rock just as hard as men but they are a genuinely civilizing and uplifting influence. (Also girls playing rock’n’roll just look so damn cute.)
Whisky-drinking women, in my experience, are women of character, with minds of their own, and a lot of fun, unless they are too-much-whisky-drinking women, who can be as much of a bore as too-much-whisky-drinking men.

Thank you very much, Judge!
A few links of interest:
Judge's official website
The Curly's Airships page.
The Judge Smith Yahoo! Discussion Group
An interesting 2003 Judge Smith interview covering his early period with Van Der Graaf Generator.
(with special thanks to David)

 
TASTING - ANOTHER TWO GLENROTHES
Glenrothes 1986/2005 (46%, Helen Arthur, Plain Oak, 600 bottles) Colour: straw – white wine. Nose: a very discreet start, with just a little alcohol and a few feinty notes. Let’s give this one a little time… Ah, yes, it does sort of take off after ten minutes or so, on pear juice and cider, with whiffs of wood smoke, porridge and tea. Still not much happening, I must say. Not exactly dull but as close to new make as it can get. Incredible considering it’s almost 20 years old…
Right, it does keep improving a bit with time: a little vanilla, green bananas, grass… But it gets also quite beer-ish. Not too bad in fact, but rather uninteresting. Mouth: sweet and rather malty attack, getting quite sugary (fructose, light breakfast honey) but with an almost nonexistent middle. Strange! Not much happening in there, I’m afraid… Just a little sugar and alcohol remaining on your palate (but almost nothing on the tongue). And the finish is short and, well, sugary. Well, it’s not especially flawed but there’s no pleasure here. Too bad. 70 points.
Glenrothes 36 yo 1969/2006 (51.8%, Duncan Taylor, cask #12885) We had the 34 yo 1968/2003 at 40.3% (90 points) and the 36 yo 1968/2005 at 57.2%, (93 points) just a few days ago so I have high expectations… Colour: gold – amber. Nose: very, very aromatic and hugely fruity, on ripe apricots, quinces and melons, plums, honey and fudge… Almost a fruit bomb, really in the Balvenie or Bruichladdich stable (as opposed to the tropical fruits one can find in old Bowmores, Lochsides, Clynelishes etc.). It gets then sort of winey (sweet white wine) and also slightly cardboardy. Goes on with roasted nuts, praline crème, chocolate… Probably a little less complex than its two previously bottled siblings but also compacter. Mouth: extremely rich and creamy, with quite some lemon and orange juice that keep the whole very lively, almost youthful. Very little tannins at this stage, which is great news. Develops on quince jelly, marzipan, light toffee, cappuccino, Irish coffee (or Scottish coffee?)… And the we start to get the oak’s influence with the nutmeg, vanillin, cinnamon, white pepper, ginger… Again, it’s not exactly complex but incredibly drinkable considering its age. Now, it does get frankly oaky toward the rather long finish, with the fruit drying out (except the quince) and being replaced with cardboardy and slightly chalky notes, but the whole is still an excellent and tireless old malt. 90 points.
 

April 24, 2006


CONCERT REVIEW by Nick Morgan
CHRISTY MOORE with DECLAN SINNOTT Barbican, London, April 17th 2006
Declan Sinnott (left) and Christy Moore (right)
Well it’s the Barbican, but not as we usually know it. Few are the Guardian hugging high-brows or the blue-rinsed patrons of the arts. In fact it’s a bit more like a rugby match at Lansdowne Road – glasses and bottles fill every available surface, even lined up along the top of the men’s urinals, which are also doing mighty service to the bladders of the thirst quenched crowd. Of course it’s a high day and bank holiday – our first one of the year, and as historians will surmise, it’s also an anniversary of some appropriate note. But it’s principally a rare solo appearance in London by Irish folk legend Christy Moore, whom we were privileged to see in the same venue last year performing with the simply wonderful Planxty, accompanied tonight by long-time collaborator and one time Horslips and Moving Hearts guitarist, Declan Sinnott.
Moore’s particular legend combines wild rock and roll excess, a voice of remarkably fragile beauty, sometime outstanding songwriting, a deep respect for the traditional canon, an ability to make other performers’ deeply personal songs his own, humour, dark depression, and a commitment to a variety of political causes, (starting at home with the Irish Republican movement but moving to support for the oppressed and victims of injustice around the world) for whom he has become something of a global voice, albeit always on his own terms. He’s fiercely passionate, I would suspect surprisingly vulnerable and self critical, has something of the perfectionist about him, wears his heart on his sleeve, and has a very short tolerance of audiences who choose to participate unasked. “There you are thinking, what a big moody old bollocks that he is, not wanting us to clap” he chides himself, having brought an over excited audience to heel with a single menacing glance. In fact (Billy Bragg please note) he doesn’t say much at all during this song packed two and a quarter hours, choosing to let his music do the talking, which it does with considerable eloquence.
Now if you weren’t there, rather than bother reading this you could buy a copy of his latest double CD, Live from Dublin 2006. Though remarkably only about half of the twenty eight songs that we get are among the thirty on that two disc set. That in itself says something about the huge repertoire of material that Moore has collected over the years. Quite how he puts the set together I can’t imagine, let alone understand how he remembers all the words (“If I get the first line it’ll be ok”, he tells us, “the first is the important one”).
But it has to be observed that by the time he’s finished there aren’t many Irish or British institutions that haven’t taken a good knocking (he breaks into the Irish equivalent of a talking blues in the middle of the apparently harmless ‘Don’t forget your shovel if you want to go to work’ and turns the shovel into a Kalashnikov to spray hot lead at leading politicians in both countries, and Serge’s beloved Charles and Camilla) along with the United States (you should listen, Serge, to his version of Morrissey’s ‘America you are not the world’, I think you would enjoy it). He has a moving reflection on the recent past in his own country, ‘Smoke and strong whiskey’ (“It's Easter again, and we cannot forget, our brothers and sisters and all that was said, so practise your pipes, stand proud in the wet, for the eyes of the world are upon you”).The Church gets a beating up in Joni Mitchell’s ‘Magdalene Laundry’; wife beaters get some of their own treatment in ‘A stitch in time’; privilege, corrupt legal systems and the Freemasons are the targets of Dylan’s ‘Hattie Carroll’, and Capitalism takes a bit of a poke in ‘Ordinary Man’. And a number of songs dwell on the not always easy experience of the Irish Diaspora – in the USA (‘City of Chicago’) and in London (‘Missing you’), not that Moore seems to be unhappy to be here. His version of Ewan McColl’s ‘Sweet Thames flow softly’ exudes a deep affection for the dear old Smoke.
And these and other songs of commitment were mixed with some heart achingly touching love songs, tales of tragedy, and just plain nonsense. ‘North and south of the river’ (co-written with Bono and The Edge), ‘Song of the wandering Aengus’ (“music written by Judy Collins, Yates out of Sligo wrote the words”), ‘Nancy Spain’ and Richard Thompson’s ‘Beeswing’ provides some of the love interest. ‘The two Conneeleys’ and ‘Cry like a man’ some of the tragedy, the crowd pleasing ‘Lisdoonvarna’ and the thoroughly mad ‘Sixteen fishermen raving’ the nonsense.