 |
 |
Hi, you're in the Archives, July 2024 - Part 2 |
|
|
|
July 31, 2024 |
|
  |
Staying with the Japanese team, Day 2 (Olympics Day 5)
We began the last session with Nikka, so let’s move on to Suntory. We hope that NAS will increasingly become a thing of the past, but of course, there are still many we haven't yet tasted. Even though we don't quite like seeing ‘founding’ years - or other age/vintage look-alike numbers - prominently displayed on the labels or neck labels. But tey will go. |
 |

|
Hakushu ‘Spanish Oak’ (48%, OB, 2021 Edition) 
We are well acquainted with the ‘Sherry Cask’, a fine dram indeed (WF 89 in cruise control mode), but the ‘Spanish Oak’ remains a mystery. Presumably, it wasn't previously genuine ‘sherry’… Colour: cognac. Nose: oh là là là là, it’s like Jamaican rum! Nuts, petrol, tar, lapsang souchong, black olives, then wild strawberry liqueur and wood glue. Magnificent and very spectacular. Mouth (neat): what a lark, we’ve wandered into Demerara territory, with more crushed strawberries, rock candy, Turkmen tar liqueur (unsure of the country), toffee, salted liquorice… Now the base structure is curiously light, even fragile. In short, we move from Demerara to the Dominican Republic (wonderful people, usually pretty poor rums). Finish: quite curiously, we remain in rum territory. It’s very surprising. Tar, salt, brown sugar, smoke… Comments: it’s a truly peculiar Hakushu, with an almost collaborative vibe, akin to something from Warhol’s Factory circa 1970. Finally, you see, it’s not really ‘whisky’ in your glass, but some aspects are sublime.
SGP:653 - 84 points. |
Let’s further check that. |

|
Hakushu 18 yo ‘Suntory 100th Anniversary’ (48%, OB, Japan, 2023) 
Of course, it’s ‘peated’. Honestly, this should be quite good… Colour: gold. Nose: it’s old Laphroaig. One cannot help but think of the old 30-year-old, which is fitting since Suntory now owns Laphroaig. Sublime camphor, bandages, embrocations, menthol and eucalyptus inhalations (some whiskies do this even better than eucalyptus oil, seriously) … In short, all those medicinal things we adore in old Laphroaig that aren’t just about the peat. Even noble apple juice and very ripe mango. Mouth: ah yes, it’s a bit more oaky than the nose suggested, alas, but it remains quite magnificent, coastal and medicinal, with peat mingled with green spices, green pepper, cider apple… Perhaps the best mouthwash ever produced by mankind. Finish: rather long, heading towards green curry, salted seaweed (wakame), orange chutney, then our friends the slightly plump oysters… Comments: there’s almost always a bit of boosted woodiness in Japanese malts, and that’s the case here, but it’s still a fabulous bottle. Happy 100th, Suntory (I’m sorry we’re late).
SGP:564 - 90 points. |
That puts Hakushu in the lead in our Olympic rankings. |

|
Yamazaki 18 yo ’Suntory 100th Anniversary’ (48%, OB, Japan, Mizunara, 2023) 
Have we not already ravaged all the Mongolian oak forests (mizunara) at this rate? Twenty years ago, almost no one had heard of the famous 'quercus mongolica crispula'. Moreover, it seems that the truly Mongolian forests no longer exist, but that’s not whisky’s fault. Phew. Colour: full gold. Nose: attention, Yamazaki is a grand malt. Here we delve into the complex, the subtle, the floral. Honeysuckle, acacia flower, beeswax, mandarin peel, orange blossom water, green orange essence... This is all so wonderful; one might almost dab a few drops behind the ears. What a nose! Mouth: but of course. The mizunara and its pine buds are quickly forgotten, shifting focus to quince, wild rose, medlar, hay wine, white clover honey, and simply bruised apples. Magnificent and truly 'Japanese'. Finish: not eternal but both soft and firm, on frozen fruits. Icewine, baby? Comments: I think we are at the pinnacle of Japan today, unless some Shizuoka or Chichibu comes along to challenge this. We shall see very soon…
SGP:551 - 91 points. |
Yamazaki now in the lead… |

|
Yamazaki ‘Mizunara Tsukuriwake Selection’ (48%, OB, Japan, 2022 Edition) 
The price commanded by these bottles, without any age indication (2K€), is simply incomprehensible to many. Who would buy a... well, a Maserati without knowing if it has a straight-4 or a V8 under the bonnet? That analogy’s a bit murky, I grant you. Well, one would still love to know who Mr. Tsukuriwake is, wouldn’t you? Colour: gold. Nose: of course, it’s very lovely, both taut and gentle, with freshly sawn wood and candle wax, bruised apple, quince tart rather than apple, a hint of vetiver in the background, even some shampoo notes... We're quite far from the 18-100th. Mouth: but yes, it’s very good, somewhat akin to some Dufftown malts (GF, B.) but with much more pronounced woodiness. Pine nuts, pine needles, and even a slight sawdust note. Finish: rather long but really on over brewed tea, wood, with a noticeable tannic quality. Notes of strawberry in the aftertaste. Comments: it started off magnificently, but the wood took over and somehow unbalanced the whole. Well, in my humble opinion.
SGP:451 - 83 points. |

|
Chichibu 2017/2023 (65%, OB for ePower, 1st fill bourbon barrel, cask #8279, 176 bottles) 
Love the name ‘ePower’, sounds like a new range by BMW. No offence meant (to ePower). Right, let’s tighten our belts, say our prayers, and think of the republic... Deep breath... here we go! Colour: pale gold. Nose: new rubber boots, fresh seaweed, all kinds of fresh bread from various countries, kerosene... And not much else. But at 65% ABV, one is a bit wary. With water: brand new Barbour (TM) jacket. I’m sure they’ve got the equivalent in Japan. Mouth (neat): it seems just totally perfect; it just clings a bit to the tongue and palate. A lot of lemon, it seems. With water: not much. A diamond is also not much (would you cut that, S. – your wife). Maybe some salted apples? And lime. Finish: long, salty, taut, precise, simple. Comments: another great Chichibu, perhaps a bit simpler albeit more ‘efficient’ than others. After all, it’s only five or six years old.
SGP:462 - 89 points. |
Hey, wait a minute, let's have a little Anglo-German expression before we call this a tasting session... |

|
Bimber ‘Germany Edition 2023’ (59.2%, OB, Kirsch Import, PX sherry, cask #456, 280 bottles) 
What's with these eagles on the label? Bimber, you might want to not mention the... Colour: deep gold. Nose: we knew this was going to be delightful, with the PX nicely tamed, delivering notes of ripe papaya, banana, wild strawberry liqueur, and raisins macerated in rum. We bow to this one. With water: polish! And asparagus, ski wax, and fresh motor oil... Mouth (neat): a magnificent Bimber, showcasing orange zest, chen-pi, and pink peppercorns... With water: the finest PX we’ve ever encountered. In other words, this wretched PX is totally under control. Smoked raisins and various waxes, you get the idea. Finish: quite long, leaning towards smoked raisins with a hint of botrytis, reminiscent of old Chaume. Comments: not the most straightforward whisky, but that adds to the dialogue and confrontation (eh?). It’s better at cask strength, but then again, cask strength is nearly 60% ABV. C’est la vie.
SGP:562 - 87 points. |
We’ll be back with the Japanese starting tomorrow. Come back if you want but brace yourselves – and contact your insurance company. |
|
July 30, 2024 |
|
  |
The Olympic Sessions, 4, staying with the Japanese squad
We thought we'd enjoy a nice and proper Japanese session, with a bit of everything, from great classics to new or recent distilleries.
There is also a perfume called "Mizunara" by Parfum Satori. However, it does not seem to contain any mizunara oak essence, but rather albanum, rosemary, clary sage, lavender, cognac oil, juniper, cypress, patchouli, blue chamomile, labdanum, tulu balsam, and sandalwood. $175 for 50ml – that's more expensive than Yamazaki! (Fragrantica).
|
 |

|
Yoichi 10 yo (45%, OB, Japan, Edition 2022) 
Yes, any excuse to revisit the recent Yoichi 10, which has been widely applauded for reintroducing a genuine age statement after a seven-year drought, is welcome. We tasted a 2023 bottling, but there was one in 2022 as well! Let's now try the 2022 version, which I doubt is much different anyway, but for the sake of comparison, we’ll consider both. Colour: pale gold (same). Nose: remarkably similar, if not identical. Fantastic bread dough notes, with hints of banana, a touch of chalk, drops of almond syrup (orgeat), a bit of eucalyptus, then a hint of porridge with a dash of... calvados within. Remember, Nikka also produces delightful calvados-like apple brandy. I find the 2022 a tad fruitier and slightly less mentholated, yet they’re as similar as the Kessler sisters (nothing to do with the American whiskey brand, I would suppose). Mouth: same whisky, to be honest. A little sawdust, green tea, banana skin, apple peel, grapefruit, chalk again... Then some earthiness, roots, perhaps gentian, and that faint dirtiness (coal) that I had previously noted and which we enjoy. Finish: medium length, apples, mint, green tea, citrus, with a hint of sawdust in the aftertaste. Comments: well, I do wonder if these were different batches. In a double-blind test without a $50K electronic sniffer, I would say one could not really tell them apart. Very, very fine whisky in any case.
SGP:551 - 88 points. |

|
The Blend of Nikka ‘Maltbase Selection’ (45%, OB, Japan, +/- 2005) 
This baby was ‘blended with a matured malt base’. I'm not quite sure what that means, perhaps there was indeed some aged malt in this rather old blend, or maybe it's a pure malt or blended malt – which is likely the case. Note that there are versions not called 'Selection', perhaps more common ones. Colour: gold. Nose: it's incredible – maybe not – how close we are to the Yoichi 10-year-old, except this one is more aromatic, leaning towards all sorts of honeys and flowers, mango and papaya, one or two small fresh mint leaves, a hint of fresh carrot, a tiny bit of coconut, and Earl Grey tea... It’s a magnificent nose. Mouth: once again, we are very close to the Yoichi, with a slightly less precise and perhaps a touch spicier profile, as if it were five years older. In theory, there should be some Miyagikyo in there, but in practice, it’s not detectable. At least, I can't sense it. Still, there's a bit of coconut, fresh wood, and tea... Finish: of medium length, more on that tea. Eucalyptus appears in the aftertaste. Comments: a bit like the sidekick to Yoichi, which is firmer and more intense. Still very good.
SGP:551 - 86 points. |

|
Kaiyo ‘Mizunara Oak Cask Strength’ (53%, OB, Japan, +/- 2024) 
Said to be 9 years old and matured in Japanese virgin mizunara. Earlier Kaiyos were sourced and perhaps not properly ‘Japanese’, or perhaps they were, but things may have changed. In any case, the mizunara here was Japanese. I must remind you that 100% Japanese origin does not guarantee quality, as we have tasted myriads of pseudo-Japanese whiskies, even from the large makers, that were rather excellent. Well, enough PCness... Colour: gold. Nose: very simple, very pure, very good. The oak is a bit mentholated and slightly hinting at maritime pine, holding its ground for now, with a pleasant touch of buds and seaweed. With water: the wood essences generate a remarkable ‘viscosity’! The nose remains very pleasant, still marked by mizunara oak, while hints of lemon and green apple peep through. Mouth (neat): the cask is very present, giving a sense of sucking on a cigar dipped in triple sec, then in pine bud liqueur. The worst part is, it’s not unpleasant. At all. With water: more sweetness, perhaps genepy liqueur. Finish: not very long but balanced, with a touch of mint green tea and pine nuts. Comments: I like it, it’s different, it stays balanced despite the near-absolute dominance of mizunara. I think it has progressed well since the Kaiyo mizunara at 43% from five or six years ago.
SGP:471 - 83 points. |

|
Kaiyo 10 yo ‘The Rye’ (46%, OB, Japan, +/- 2024) 
Another story of maturation, as this ‘whisky’ was aged in new mizunara, then in ex-rye from Knob Creek - hence its rye designation - and even spent three months at sea for a ‘dynamic maturation’. Truly a whisky of maturation rather than distillation. Colour: gold. Nose: one shouldn’t expect a rye explosion, but there are nonetheless ginger cookies, smoked paprika, rye bread, hints of cedarwood (cigar box), parsley, and dried wild (bear) garlic... Mouth: very good! Clearly more American than Japanese, evoking the Pacific Northwest USA or even British Columbia. It’s amusing! Lovely fruity spices, pink peppercorns, notes of celeriac, a touch of fresh turmeric, then those mizunara notes, pine buds, resins, and mint, chartreuse... It's really very pleasant, the wood is quite pronounced but, in this case, it’s an asset. Nice balance. Finish: medium length, spicy sweetness, ginger, watercress, mild mustard... Comments: great maturation and construction work, quite ‘whisky 4.0’. As long as they don’t cancel Brora, I’m fine with that...
SGP:461 - 85 points. |

|
Akashi 4 yo ‘Calvados Cask Finish’ (62%, OB, Japan, Y’s Cask Tokyo, +/- 2023) 
Malt from Eigashima distillery, aka White Oak. These malts are properly Japanese, while many blends they do under the same names are not. So, we’re truly in Japan now (despite the calvados part, haha). Colour: pale gold. Nose: indeed, it does smell a bit like apple, but at 62% vol., all spirits smell like apple, don’t they? Anyway, it seems nice, with wafts of camphor, but let's not push our luck… With water: fresh apple, fresh apple, and fresh apple. And perhaps fresh apple. A few touches of paraffin. Mouth (neat): what a mixture! Full-on calvados and apples, skins, stems, seeds, and flesh, it’s all there. But water can change things... With water: superb texture and finally, this beverage takes on another dimension, with menthol, a rooty note, maybe turnip, a suety aspect, then back to apple and pear compote. Let’s say 2/3 apple - 1/3 pear. Finish: medium length, well balanced, and with a touch of greengages. I adore greengages but they’ve become hard to find, except in our whiskies. Long live whiskies! Comments: there's undoubtedly an experimental side to this blend. Personally, I like it a lot.
SGP:551 - 85 points. |
We'll finish with a Kanosuke, and we'll come back tomorrow, okay? |

|
Kanosuke 2019/2023 (61%, OB, for ePower, Japan, oloroso sherry, cask #19421, 281 bottles) 
We love Kanosuke, they've swiftly established themselves among the top tier of genuine Japanese whiskies, but let's not forget that behind them lies the might of Diageo. So, it's kind of ‘craft by big’ – but there's certainly nothing wrong with that. Colour: full gold. Nose: yes, of course, it's walnut stain and oil paint. As they say, it's oloroso from Oloroso & Oloroso’s. With water: sulphur, carbon dust, an old fisherman's net left abandoned on the beach (the net, not the fisherman) and an old box of Cuban cigars. Mouth (neat): massive, rich, liqueur-like and ultra-dry at the same time (yes, that's possible). Pine needles, walnut wine, very old dry sherry, masala, mustard sauce... With water: very tight, very sharp, very dry, bitter, austere, demanding... And we love it. An old artichoke and bitter orange cordial, like our ancestors used to pour into their beers. Finish: long, with notes of beef broth, pepper, dried meats, then everything else we've already discovered. Comments: I think it’s not impossible that only 10% of whisky enthusiasts will love this extreme style, but we are definitely part of that 10%, with joy and determination.
SGP:272 - 88 points. |
|
July 29, 2024 |
|
  |
Another Olympic Session (3)
Starting from France, as usual…
A typical cognac still aka alambic Charentais. More and more whisky is being made in Charentais stills these days (photo Sémhur, Cherves de Cognac) |
 |

|
Khêmeia (43%, OB, Distillerie d’Aumagne, France, 2023) 
Sounds a bit like 'Kamala', no? In recent years, there's been a trend among cognac producers - and anyone with alembics in France - like Louis Royer here, to dabble in whisky production using their Charentais stills. This often results in lighter, less textured whiskies compared to their Scottish counterparts, but generally of good quality despite their youth. Whether they can break out beyond the local market remains to be seen. This wee Khêmeia exemplifies this trend. Colour: gold. Nose: technically near-perfect in a modern style, bourbon-influenced without overdoing it. Ripe banana, vanilla, sponge cake, a hint of fresh sawdust, and tropical fruits like papaya mingle with drops of orange, peach, and melon liqueur. The young age isn't too obvious at this point. Mouth: a bit of ginger and white pepper at first, but the distillate brings notes of toasted malt, a slight salinity, and again, peach and melon. There's a hint of bitter almonds as well. Finish: decent length, more herbaceous, with a light chalky quality, some lemon, and those saline touches reappearing to lift everything. Comments: I quite like this little Khêmeia. The name, meaning 'alchemy' in Greek, suits it well.
SGP:551 - 83 points. |

|
Amaethon (45%, OB, France, +/-2023) 
Might sound Greek, but it's Gaulish, apparently. Astérix’s whisky? Distilled from French barley, much like many a Scot, though the distillery of origin remains a mystery to me. Colour: white wine. Nose: very charming, this really does come across as a quality malt distilled by serious craftsmen. Fresh apple, lemon, and mirabelles, then a touch of porridge, bread dough, and croissants (though that doesn’t prove it's French, does it?). A bit of modelling clay and candle wax too. Mouth: very good on the palate, more tense than its Charentais counterpart, with lemon and white pepper again, followed by apples and pears. There's a delightful coastal and smoky edge. Some fresh wood appears later, indicating its youth. Finish: good length, with lemon, a hint of brine, and a touch of bitterness. Comments: it's difficult to achieve more complexity at such a young age. Much like Khêmeia, they haven't taken many stylistic risks, but you can't fault them for that. Reminds me of some not-so-Japanese Japanese whiskies.
SGP:551 - 83 points. |

|
Kalwijck 2019/2023 ‘Higgledy Piggledy’ (46%, OB, Netherlands, oloroso, 525 bottles, +/-2023) 
Has me curious about the proper pronunciation of 'Kalwijck,' so any accurate info would be appreciated. This is a grain whisky, Maize I suppose, but they also produce liqueurs and, naturally, genever. Colour: straw. Nose: the oloroso influence is subtle, but there are delightful wafts of root vegetables, turnip, beetroot, along with white asparagus, coriander seeds, charcoal, and fig leaves. It's far more unusual and specific than the French offerings, and thankfully lacks the dullness that grain whiskies can sometimes exhibit. Mouth: it may not be very deep, but the profile is charming, with that charcoal and those root notes, particularly celery, followed by rye and a tobacco smoke element. There are hints of bitter almonds, a touch of tar, earthiness, and a notably oily texture for a grain whisky. Could the oloroso cask have been previously boosted with peated malt whisky? Finish: it loses a few points here due to an uncontrolled herbaceous bitterness, but nevermind. Some ashes. Comments: I believe this has great potential. It's certainly very 'different.'
SGP:462 - 81 points. |
Since we mentioned rye... |

|
Goldwaescher 5 yo 2018/2023 ‘Malted Rye’ (52.5%, OB, Switzerland, Swiss oak, cask #41) 
We’re in Willisau here, mind you. Several distillers have already told me that working with malted rye was ‘insane’, but there you go, this could not frighten a proper Swiss distiller. BTW we’ve tried sister cask #44 in January, it was pretty superb (WF 87). Colour: deep gold. Nose: it deviates wildly, and we love that. Banana and curry cake, with honey and geranium syrup. Then an abundance of pumpernickel. With water: even more curry, saffron, also touches of pink grapefruit… Mouth (neat): it’s not really whisky, it’s more like a blend of wood-aged eaux de vie. The problem is, we love it. Eau-de-vie of beer, celery, gentian, Jerusalem artichokes… All this is bizarre, I grant you, but it’s really very good. With water: all the same, with very lemony hops at the helm. Finish: long, with the earthy side and the lemon coming out even more. A sweet and spicy aftertaste. Comments: nice job. Goldwaescher means gold panner, it looks like they’ve struck a vein in Willisau.
SGP:661 - 86 points. |
While we're at it with the strange, back to Holland... |

|
Millstone 2019/2024 (57.3%, OB for The Whisky Jury, refill PX hogshead, cask #2547, 319 bottles)
Ah, a peated one, brace yourselves. We've got much older Millstones to sample at WF HQ, but let's not overdo it with the good stuff all at once. Colour: full gold. Nose: imagine a homemade gingerbread loaded with honey, left in a smoker for a good while. Simple, isn't it? With water: a profusion of vegetal ashes, cigar smoke, horseradish, rowan, and mullein, with a hint of holly eau-de-vie, then Brussels sprouts. Save the Brussels sprouts! Mouth (neat): it packs quite a punch and is extremely concentrated, making it a bit bitter at this stage. Citrus peels. With water: still firm and rich, but more approachable, with touches of ripe strawberries (a classic in some peated whiskies, in my personal experience), then pepper, turmeric, and hints of juniper. And pepper again. Finish: very long, surprisingly balanced, but still a tad extreme. Bitter oranges, salt, Brussels sprouts, seaweed, tobacco, pepper... rather extreme pepper in the aftertaste. Comments: I love it, but it's still a young pup. One of those that nip at your ankles, just for fun.
SGP:566 - 87 points. |
|
July 28, 2024 |
|
  |

|
|
A word of caution
Let me please remind you that my humble assessments of any spirits are done from the point of view of a malt whisky enthusiast who, what's more, is aboslutely not an expert in rum, brandy, tequila, vodka, gin or any other spirits. Thank you – and peace! |
Malternatives on Sunday: a Few Anniversary Rums
As promised, here are a few aged rums we've saved for later. They aren't necessarily extraordinary bottles, but we're taking the opportunity to enjoy them as WF's anniversary falls on a Sunday! We might add a couple of new ones at the end. |
 |
.jpg)
|
Aguardente de Cana 1928 (Madeira, 1960s) 
They produced a lot of aguardentes in Madeira to fortify wines rather than to export it as a drink, with sugar cane primarily used for sugar production. Note, the appellation (DOP) rhum agricole de Madera was only established in 2011. This old aguardiente surely does not meet the criteria for such an appellation, but it's always marvellous to taste such a spirit. Colour: dark amber. Nose: I adore this earthy and dirty side, very much about slag, basalt (isn't Madeira basaltic?), balsamico, curry, walnut, mustard, seawater, but also glue and varnish, turpentine essence… Truly, there's a small yet magnificent grand-arôme aspect. Can you imagine, 1928! Mouth: we are close to the driest wines of Madeira, to the point of wondering if there's some marc or fine in this very lovely old sugar cane spirit. Again, an earthy side, a bit meaty, evolving towards black olives, molasses, gravy, very dark caramel, and also a touch of tar, mint, and liquorice. The structure is not massive, but the whole retains a lot of vitality. Finish: slightly short, but very nicely peppered, salty, and liquorice-like. Balsamic vinegar and caramel return in the aftertaste, with a small sweet note. Comments: the foundations of a solid appellation contrôlée were already there. I also love how Madeira rums are often quite close to the island's wines.
SGP:562 - 88 points. |
This one might be close... |

|
Rhum Martinique ‘Grand Arôme’ (44%, Union des Négociants pour l’Alimentation, France, 1960s) 
These types of bottles were common in France back in the day, mainly used for cooking, flambéing crêpes, making rum babas, pastries, marinades, and the like. And sometimes for cocktails. The fact is, you occasionally stumble upon real beauties, even if here, the closure was a crude plastic cap that surely wasn't meant to last this long. So, typically a cooking rum... By the way, I remind you that nowadays, to be labelled 'Grand Arôme', a rum must contain at least 500g of esters per hectolitre of pure alcohol. Colour: gold/bronze. Nose: well, here we are, close to Madeiran style, as expected. Olives, varnish, tar, glue, menthol, terpenes... but less on fruits and nuts. In fact, it's quite simply closer to today's Jamaican style. Lots of fermented cane juice, but nothing suggests this rum is ‘pure juice’, probably not. Mouth: there's still an agricultural side, to be honest. Salt, zest, liquorice, seaweed, overripe banana, cinnamon, cane syrup, ground coriander, and a few touches of ripe strawberries. Ethyl acetate? It's an ester... Finish: medium length, sweeter (brown sugar), orange liqueur. There was probably some ‘doctoring’. The finish is not its best feature. Comments: always worth having a look at the back of our grandmothers' cupboards!
SGP:652 - 85 points. |

|
Royal Navy ‘Black Tot’ (stone flagon, 1950s) 
This renowned rum was served to the British Navy until 1970. Some of the remaining stocks were later gathered and bottled by Sukhinder Singh and his gang, much to our delight, but here we have an original flagon that may have travelled the world many times. Note that the image is not of the flagon we are tasting, but it is very similar. We presume this is a blend of rums from British Guiana, Jamaica, Barbados, etc. Colour: mahogany. Nose: varnish, tar, very ripe bananas, liquorice, caramel, chocolate, and toasted nuts. Perhaps a hint of seawater. I suppose it’s too late to enlist in the British Navy? Mouth: it must be about 45% vol. Very thick, with plenty of salted liquorice and old nuts, indeed some seawater, bitter orange, perhaps a touch of (added) molasses, and truly that thick, typical profile. A hint of Port Mourant, unless there’s some Skeldon or Albion in it. It’s very good. Finish: long, salty, with coffee liqueur and more olives this time. Comments: I’m still going to send an application to the Royal Navy, you never know. I imagine we have in our glass a blend for Senior Officers.
SGP:663 - 88 points. |
Here, we've already tasted the following one, but it was a long time ago and it was a different bottle (as usual, any excuse will do, S.) ... |

|
Alfred Lamb’s Special Reserve Rum 1949 (40%, United Rum Merchants, bottled in Dumbarton, Jamaican, 510 bottles) 
Several rumours on the internet suggest this might be from Hampden. Colour: full gold. Nose: it’s difficult to confirm as it seems too soft and mentholated for Hampden, but perhaps they produced a different style back then? The profile is magnificent, though slightly light and fragile. Old cellar, damp earth, almond wine, moss and ferns, linseed oil, noble molasses (whatever that is), then lots of perhaps slightly tired vegetables (soup), liquorice wood, medlars, horse saddle, stable... It seems a bit different from the last time, but that was in 2012 and, as we said, a different bottle. After so many years, bottles can diverge, which is part of the sport (and provides excuses to taste again). Mouth: one of the rare cases where such a low alcohol content poses no problem. It’s like a very old dry port, with lovely notes of buds, mint and anise, old fruit eaux-de-vie, marzipan, but also much less wood than last time. It seems to have softened after 12 more years in glass. Old-fashioned cough syrup, the kind so good we’d pretend to have sore throats to sip a couple of centilitres in peace. The beginnings of true preventive medicine. Finish: not so short but more liqueur-like, mentholated, with drops of very old chartreuse and tar liqueur. Comments: a very fine bottle, though, let’s admit, the low wattage causes some slight frustrations.
SGP:651 - 87 points. |

|
Mount Gay ‘Extra Old’ (40%, OB, Barbados, 75cl, +/-1990) 
We're not exactly Mount Gay experts, being whisky enthusiasts. It’s true that Foursquare often grabs our attention, and our bandwidth for rum, especially Bajan rum, is rather limited. We’ve tried a more recent XO before and found it ‘very good but slightly average’ (WF 80) back in 2009. Much molasses has flowed under the bridge since then, so let's keep an open mind, shall we? Colour: deep gold. Nose: very nice varnish, even a bit of solvent, then hazelnut, fresh cane, caramel, damp earth, ripe peaches, and a bit of old paper. I do love old papers. Mouth: certainly not a WF 80, though it's a bit light and fragile. More hazelnuts, nocino, earth, old sweet wines, a touch of salt like in manzanilla... By the way, have they ever made an Extra Old Cask Strength? Or at least 100 proof? 80 proof? Finish: short, but full of cane, even vesou, nougat, toasted sesame... Comments: come on, 75 proof? What a pity.
SGP:441 - 83 points. |

|
Mount Gay ‘Eclipse’ (39.4%, OB, Barbados, 75cl, +/-1990) 
We tasted a more recent Mount Gay Eclipse and found it a bit weak for our liking (WF 72 - very much an 'eclipse'), but we're more motivated than ever! Colour: gold. Nose: a very lovely old version, saltier, more secondary, even tertiary, with broth, coffee, fresh cement, mushrooms, tiny notes of solvent, then those famous strawberries we just found in the old grand arôme from Martinique. Toasted pecans follow, bringing everything together nicely. Mouth: of course, it lacks punch, but it’s good, toasty, with cappuccino, roasted nuts, sugarcane juice, then hay and little biscuits. But it drops off rather quickly, unfortunately, veering somewhat towards an entry-level Cuban style. Still, it remains pleasant. Finish: short. Amusingly, the strawberry (in yoghurt or candy form) remains present. Comments: it's really good, but the XO had more personality, if not exactly groove.
SGP:440 - 81 points. |
Last attempt with a Mount Gay, this time already from the current owners' period I believe (Rémy)... |

|
Mount Gay ‘Tricentennial Selection’ (43%, OB, Barbados, 2003) 
This one seems to fetch ludicrous sums, akin to that of a third-hand Golf. It’s purportedly a blend of vintages 1969, 1974, and 1976, making it about 26 or 27 years old. Never had the chance to taste it before. Colour: amber. Nose: once again, it’s astonishing how an extra 3% changes everything. We used to call it the Laphroaig 10 effect; the 43% version was immeasurably superior to the 40%, as admitted by the distillery manager of the time (sweet Iain). Back to Barbados, it’s lovely, with an obvious kinship to Foursquare (I know the latter is much more recent), seeming like a blend of column and pot still. Wonderful orange blossom water, honeysuckle, sugar cane, muscovado, toasted pistachios, sesame... Let’s hope the palate holds up. Mouth: it does, quite well indeed, remaining fairly tense, sweet but balanced, with sugar cane syrup, honey, and nougat, then crème de menthe. It’s still a light rum, somewhat inoffensive but elegant, with a lovely honeyed quality. Finish: a bit short but sweet, caramelised with honey-roasted peanuts. A tiny hint of salt in the aftertaste. Comments: I forgot, Mount Gay was founded in 1703, hence the tricentenary in 2003. Note, there’s also a ‘1703’ cuvée which is quite good (WF 84).
SGP:541 - 85 points. |
Let’s now add a few newer ones, if you please… Let's go back to Madeira then! |

|
William Hinton 3 yo (40%, OB, Madeira, +/-2023)
William Hinton 3 years old bears the name of an Englishman who, in the 19th century, developed the sugar and rum industry in Madeira and built a large distillery. The latter closed its doors in 1986, but the distillery Engenho Novo da Madeira, created 20 years later, took up its column still. Colour: deep gold. Nose: very rich, with a fair amount of molasses, toasted wood, slightly overbaked cakes, roasted nuts, pancake sauce, then plenty of honey and soft liquorice. I also find a lot of maple syrup. Mouth: very sweet (molasses) and marked by syrups, cane and maple. A bit in the style of some Mauritian rums but with a slightly spicier structure in the background. Vanilla and liquorice allsorts, on a base not so light despite the low strength. Finish: quite long, sweet, this time very caramelised. Comments: much better than a version of the 3 yo at 45% which seemed to have been boosted with red wine, but you wouldn't necessarily recognise it as a pure cane juice rum.
SGP:630 - 75 points. |

|
Rhum Hardy ‘VSOP’ (42%, OB, Martinique, agricole, +/-2023) 
An old name currently made at Saint James but you can still visit the remains of the old distillerie Hardy (or Habitation Tartane) on the Presqu’île de la Caravelle. Looks like they still harvest canes from the same location. This VSOP is 4 years old. Colour: full gold. Nose: delightfully mentholated and toasted, quite earthy, slightly waxy, very ‘agricole’, developing on yellow flowers, honey, cappuccino, tobacco, and some figs. A slight metallic note that we always enjoy. Then we find more dark nougat. Mouth: absolutely excellent, with a medicinal side (menthol again, eucalyptus) and a sort of lemony liquorice. It almost feels like there’s a touch of Islay whisky, or that the canes were smoked with peat before being pressed. Has anyone tried doing that? We’re not talking about whisky cask finishing, are we? That’s just a shortcut for the lazy. Ahem. Finish: quite long, very lovely. Coffee and caramelised liquorice, mentholated and smoky. Comments: I really like this unusual little agricole.
SGP:562 - 85 points. |

|
Sodade 4 yo ‘Atlântico VO’ (45%, OB, Grogue, Cabo Verde, +/-2023)
We’ve already tried an awesome Sodade 'Botanic Joao' last year (WF 86). We love grogue, it’s made from local sugarcane, like agricole, even if lower quality grogues are said to be made from imported canes. This one comes from local red cane, with a long fermentation using wild yeasts (15 days!) and pot still distillation. The strange finishing in agricole barrels from Martinique (some say in mezcal?) seems a bit odd in this context, but let’s move on. Colour: white wine. Nose: very lovely, oily on the nose, marked by sweet roots (beets, carrots) then sugarcane, buckwheat, small raisins, damp earth, and autumn leaves. A few touches of tobacco and cinnamon too. Mouth: a little salty and vinegary at first, which I like a lot, then olives and seaweed, a touch of mustard, finally sugarcane, tobacco, bitter almonds, orange marmalade, and very dry riesling. A high-level cachaça side. Finish: long, with that magnificent and unusual acidic note and a beautifully earthy/dirty aftertaste. We always love that. Comments: just superb. These grogues should be better known.
SGP:462 - 86 points. |

|
Trois Rivières ‘Rhum Vieux de l’Océan’ (54%, OB, Martinique, agricole, +/-2022) 
We tasted a superb multi-vintage last week, so let’s keep the momentum going! In the past, some Trois Rivières have been too woody for me, while others were perfect. Let’s check this truly bizarre, almost frightening bottle… Especially since the reduction from 75% to 54% ABV was done with… sea water. Yes, really. Colour: gold. Nose: round, caramelised, almost sweet. Corn syrup, popcorn, cane syrup, fudge… It’s a wee bit ‘flat’, without particular character, but water might change things. With water: it changes a bit, with fresh paint and putty, but you don’t really get the ‘ocean’. It’s not like a platter of 24 oysters with lots of seaweed, if you know what I mean. Mouth (neat): strong ‘agricole’ presence now, with touches of lavender, bitter oranges, earth, geranium jelly, cinnamon flan… You feel some salt but not at the level of 15% sea water. We’ve all gulped seawater at some point, it’s very different, isn’t it? With water: a bit spicy and very floral (lots of lavender this time), with a gin-like side, juniper, coriander seeds… Finish: long, woody, peppery, earthy, quite ‘agricole’. A certain salinity indeed in the aftertaste. Comments: you feel a bit of salt on your lips, but we’re quite far from the ‘salmiak’ side we expected. It remains a very good rum, of course.
SGP:551 - 83 points. |
Since we’ve already tried several Madeirans… |

|
Hampden ‘Madeira 2023’ (63.4%, The Colours of Rum, Jamaica, cask #38, 1500-1600 gr/HLPA, 88 bottles, 2024) 
Oh what a fool (I’m talking about myself) I thought it was a Madeira rum. Tasting this little DOK now is like fast-forwarding an old Betamax VCR and reaching the end of the movie too quickly (and accidentally discovering the murderer). Remember? Anyway, its oloroso cousin was magnificent last week (WF 89) and we know Madeira suits rum much better than sherry. Don’t you agree? Colour: partridge eye! It was a red Madeira! Nose: forget it. Twelve litres of acetone, a few drops of ammonia, nail polish (and nail polish remover, while we're at it), Spanish olives, diesel fuel, cider vinegar, brake dust (from a Tesla) … And no red wine so far, but I can’t see how any red wine, even Pétrus or Romanée-Conti, could stand out in this extreme context. With water: the same, plus a touch of mustard. No red Madeira, niente, nada, nichts. Mouth (neat): Hampden DOK. Insane. With water: really very good, perhaps with a bit of cherry liqueur and Szechuan pepper, but the rest is pure DOK. Finish: DOK. Comments: DOK with a touch of cherry.
SGP:463 - 90 points. |
Let's get to the bottom of this... |

|
Hampden 1 yo ‘DOK’ (52%, OB, La Maison & Velier, The 8 Marks Collection, Jamaica, ex-bourbon, 20cl, 2024) 
From the renowned collection of 8 marks by Hampden, bottled in 20cl. I'm still pondering whether I prefer last year's 'white' version, which was utterly superlative. Please don't read too much into that. Colour: straw. Nose: well, the spirit is so powerful and precise that no cask type could claim to have any influence for, let's say, thirty years. I'm barely exaggerating. With water: sublime varnishes, olive oils, puncture repair glue, and very fermented fruits… Mouth (neat): give it up. Varnish, ultra-rotten plums, carbon, wood glue, etc. With water: but it's so good! Lots of salty liquorice has joined the mix (about 10% salt). Finish: very long, with similar notes, then a more medicinal and bitter aftertaste. Comments: my dear wife tells me it tastes like Williams pear, well I didn’t marry her for her spirits analysis abilities.
SGP:463 - 90 points. |
We remind you nonetheless that DOK stands for 'Dermot Owen Kelly-Lawson', the highest ester count at Hampden and in the whole of Jamaica, and perhaps in the entire rum world, not too sure… But let's take a short break before moving on to the next ones… |

|
Isautier 16 yo 2005/2021 (65%, OB, La Réunion, lot #16/17, 502 bottles) 
This one’s an agricole Isautier, rather than the more common traditionnel or industriel variant. It spent 1 year in new wood followed by 15 years in refill casks, sometimes referred to as ‘roux’. Quite the opposite approach to what most Scottish distilleries favour these days. Colour: amber. Nose: a bit challenging at first due to the high ABV. Some putty perhaps? With water: opens up nicely with delicate hints of tomato bush, geranium, fresh paint, putty, sesame oil, a touch of formic acid, and lemon oil. Mouth (neat): über-agricole indeed, with notes of mentholated glue, ginseng and turmeric liqueur, bitter herbs, and lavender-scented soap. With water: becomes excellent, revealing samphire, capers, sage, wee bell peppers, tarragon, and more paint. Finish: long and chemical in a splendid way, bursting with grapefruit and lemon skins, including that bitter white pith. Comments: water is absolutely essential for this one. Without it, this high-powered Isautier remains crazy. Utterly awesome.
SGP: 461 – 87 points. |

|
Chichigalpa 2002/2013 (63.1%, L’Esprit, Nicaragua, cask #BB5, 100 bottles) 
I’ve always been keen to try this one, but it has been languishing in a box for quite some time. This happens to many rums at WF Towers, alas, and we deeply regret it. We could really use a week with three Sundays. This should be a Flor de Caña, as I believe there’s only one distillery in the country, so no need to play Hercule Poirot. Colour: gold. Nose: vanilla, vanilla, vanilla, and sunflower oil, with a hint of coconut. Utterly delightful... With water: notes of mandarin juice and a bit of brown sugar. Very inoffensive, yet elegant. It’s always a treat to taste these rums without any additives, isn’t it? Mouth (neat): light structure, plenty of ethanol but also some hay wine (which is very good) and little dried white fruits, like white mulberries. With water: and goji berries. A touch of white tea. Finish: not very long, but I insist, elegant, soft, discreet, and well-mannered. Faint hints of fresh button mushrooms in the aftertaste. Comments: fantastic job bringing this out. I believe it’s well above anything the owners have offered in recent years.
SGP: 441 - 84 points. |

|
Long Pond 17 yo 2006/2023 (60.1%, Zéro Nine Spirits for Clos des Spiritueux, Jamaica, Série Geisha #1, 288 bottles) 
One might wonder about the connection with Japan, but does it really matter? Colour: amber. Nose: these Long Ponds perfectly straddle the line between esters (olive, petrol, varnish) and tropical fruits (mango, very ripe banana…). It’s quite magnificent. With water: more varnish, paint, linoleum, dried seaweed, kippers, and a bundle of liquorice straight from Scandinavia (there’s your Jamaica connection, I’m sure) … Mouth (neat): how marvellous these Long Ponds are! The mentholated tobacco aspect is quite spectacular, with salt, pepper, ash, and soot too. It’s rather drying, but in a very lovely way. With water: notes of petrol, olives, and slightly bitter citrus. Finish: very long but turns rather bitter and very herbal. Perhaps not its most charming side. Comments: we were at 90+ until the finish, which was slightly drying and bitter, but that’s quite common.
SGP: 363 - 89 points. |
Good, we’re running out of benzine, see you later. Happy 22nd, Whiskyfun. |
(Thanks a lot Francesco, Nicolas, and Sebastian!) |
Check the index of all rums we've tasted so far
|
|
July 27, 2024 |
|
  |
Whiskyfun turns 22 this weekend |
We'll admit, we were a bit caught off guard by our anniversary this year, especially since my amusing country had decided to organise the opening of the Olympic Games on the exact same weekend, and I didn't find the time to write the traditional personal editorial. We'll do that at the end of the year, okay? But in the mean time we may see each other at the Edinburgh Fringe this year, then at the Whisky Show in London (we're going to do a fun ‘blind masterclass’ with Dawn D., Dave B., and Sukhinder S.), then of course at Whisky Live Paris (we'll see what we come up with) and possibly in Mitteleuropa. Que sera sera, qui vivra verra . |
 |
In any case, there will only be two sessions to celebrate our 22nd anniversary: today, some terrific Port Ellens and Ardbegs by Angus, and tomorrow, a few rums by yours truly, since it will be Sunday, the official day for malternatives. -Serge |
|
Angus's Corner
From our correspondent and
skilled taster Angus MacRaild in Scotland
|
|
|
Port Ellen & Ardbeg
for Whiskyfun’s
22nd Birthday
I had already been eyeing this wee stash of Port Ellen samples accumulating on my shelves when Serge prodded me and mentioned that this weekend (tomorrow precisely) is Whiskyfun’s 22nd birthday. So, it seems like a serendipitous quirk that I was already planning to do battle with these Port Ellens today - and gives good reason to add into the bargain a modest pile of Ardbegs as well. |
 |
|
|
Twenty-two is not a milestone year generally, but in the case of a hobby whisky blog, I would say each year from here on out counts as some sort of milestone. |
|
|
I think it’s important to re-iterate that this blog is a tasting diary and a hobby. We don’t monetise it in any way and we both continue to record and publish notes here because it is a pleasurable and fun past time. For me, personally, and speaking as someone who is also professionally involved in whisky in various ways, it’s also an extremely useful way to keep myself tasting, thinking and writing about whisky for the sake of pleasure and fun. Even if that’s only a handful of notes here and there, it’s a joyful way to exercise that process of tasting a whisky and trying to pin down and communicate what you think about it. |
|
|
It is understandable that sometimes people get worked up about any number of things on Whiskyfun: from individual scores; to scoring methodology; whether or not or to what degree to comment upon pricing. These are all understandable areas that cause intermittent ripples of disagreement or debate in our community. I would say that over the nineteen years I’ve been working in whisky (on and off admittedly) and even longer in terms of participation in the wider culture, I would simply offer one important observation: as whisky has become much more expensive, so things like opinions, scores and even tasting notes themselves can become political and more profoundly divisive because we feel like more is at stake. |
|
|
I understand why things written on Whiskyfun might not always be agreed with, but I do think the great strength of Whiskyfun remains the consistency of taste that Serge and I share. The clarity of stated opinion, in that we are both self-confessed lovers of distillate-driven whiskies, and less so fans of overtly oak-influenced, or wine treated whiskies. That position has been a constant on Whiskyfun and, based on the broad feedback I hear from our excellent readership, it’s a position that has allowed many people to make sense of our notes in accordance with their own personal preferences. Which, I hope, makes our often silly and utterly non-professional wee writings, at least of some use and interest within our community. And most of all, I hope it still makes those notes, and Whiskyfun itself, of some relevance. |
|
|
As Whiskyfun enter its 23rd year, I feel broadly optimistic about whisky and its outlook at the smaller-scale, single malt level. There are interesting people striving to do interesting things everywhere, a phenomenon which will, in time, I’m sure, deliver better and more interesting whiskies. Beyond that, I feel a few more strands of pessimism encroaching in relation to the fortunes of the wider, mainstream industry. Relentless pursuit of higher prices for what are essentially mass produced, relatively simple and unhealthy products is not something that feels sustainable in the face of many tough headwinds, both economic and cultural. |
|
|
What I’m certain of however, is that there will continue to be a culture and community that revolves around this funny, frequently delicious, sometimes weird, curiously enthralling drink we call whisky. The fortunes of the wider industry may sway one way or the other, but the community of authentically motivated and passionately interested people remains broad enough and large enough to sustain itself into the future I think. |
|
|
What I am continually reminded of, is that whisky is social, it is about pleasure, about fun, about experience and, above all, about people. If it is not those things, then it is deader than a Kamikaze Dodo - and no amount of five figure trinkets for ultra-high net worth tax avoiders will resuscitate it in the long run. |
|
|
 |
Port Ellen 13 yo 1983/1996 (43%, Instituto Ecologico Italiano) 
Colour: white wine. Nose: pure seawater and sheep wool with these wee grubby undertones that are very typical PE. Fisherman’s rubber wellies, tarred rope, smoked sea salt and bitumen. Gets increasingly petrolic and gently ashy as well. Mouth: just perfect at 43%! Very pure and briny peat smoke, ashiness, tarred rope again, more rather punchy and fat coastal qualities, grapefruit rind, almond oil, camphor and pickling brine. Superb peaty and briny combination developing. Finish: long, tarry, full of smoked olive oils, tinned sardines, lemon juice and capers. Comments: just perfect young Port Ellen.
SGP: 466 - 91 points |
|
|
 |
Port Ellen 1971/1989 (40%, Jas Gordon & Co. Auxil Import France) 
Colour: gold. Nose: stunning old school Islay peat that manages to be both somehow drying and coastal but also sweetish and incorporating feelings of smoked honey, dried exotic fruits and natural tar liqueurs. Simple in some ways, but utterly beautiful. I find it a little reminiscent of some 1960s Caol Ila. Mouth: feels little tired at first, but these deeper, bass-like notes of dry, earth peat smoke, coal embers and medical tinctures such as iodine are there and begin to grow in presence with a little time. Lovely drying, peppery and tarry quality. As ever, this is just made a bit problematic by G&M’s bottling practice of chill filtration + 40% + caramel (probably). Gets surprisingly salty and earthy with time, showing some wonderful notes of dried seaweed and tar. Finish: surprisingly long given that initial softness of arrival in the mouth. Glowing peat embers, tar, iodine and this rather sooty / camphor note in the aftertaste. Comments: a wobble on the initial palate, but I think it recovers very finely. Port Ellen had some real glory years in the those first five years of production post-reconstruction. The nose alone is 94-point material but taken altogether I think we’ll go with…
SGP: 566 - 91 points. |
|
|
 |
Port Ellen 1978/1992 (43%, Dun Eideann, Auxil Import France, casks #70-77, 3,500 bottles) 
An old sub-series of Signatory’s, one which sheltered many incredible bottlings during its lifetime. Colour: white wine. Nose: very different, and at first feels much lighter on the peat smoke, much more dominated by lemon rinds, seawater, wet beach pebbles and delicate medicinal notes of bandages and mercurochrome. Perhaps also a few notes of capers and green peppercorns in brine. A beautiful, lighter take on Port Ellen that still manages to retain some of these more typical ‘dirty’ aspects. Mouth: terrific arrival! Sooty, drying and peppery peat smoke, balanced by seawater, more lemon zest and notes of coal smoke and oysters. Fresh, but firmly on the lighter side of this distillery. Lovely gentle saltiness that works well with these citrus vibes and lighter peat smoke notes. Finish: good length, on a rather crystalline, brittle peat smoke, anchovy paste, pepper and tar. There’s also a fun farmy note that appears in the aftertaste. Comments: the late 70s were slightly less ‘immediate’ vintages at Port Ellen I would say, but this one has a freshness and a clarity of distillate character that is just sublime, even at this humble 43%.
SGP: 455 - 92 points. |
|
|
 |
Port Ellen 21 yo 1979/2001 (50%, Douglas Laing ‘Old Malt Cask’, 636 bottles) 
Colour: straw. Nose: cleaner than the 80s vintages of PE I would say, much more on crystalline peat and shoreline ‘stuff’. Lots of crushed seashells, seawater, beach pebbles and also bandages and gauze. Some mineral salts and hints of dried seaweed too. With water: very nicely on crab sticks, seashells, mussels in broth, sandalwood and coastal herbs. Mouth: excellent and emphatic Port Ellen oiliness with soft embrocations, white pepper and wee traces of camphor and hessian. A little tar too. With water: pure, coastal, salty and pin sharp with lemon juice, peat ashes and coal smoke. Finish: good length, rather briny, ashy, smoky and on lanolin and kelp. Comments: not a stellar Port Ellen, but rather a bright, clean, slightly lighter and very good one.
SGP: 456 - 89 points. |
|
|
 |
Port Ellen 27 yo 1978/2006 (54.8%, Douglas Laing, Platinum Selection, Old & Rare, sherry, 396 bottles) 
Colour: pale amber. Nose: stupendous tarriness, mixed with salted liquorice, varnish, cheng pi, dried kelp and umami seasonings such as Maggi. Superb earthiness and dryness with wee cured meats and some preserved dark fruits. Plum sauce, beef stock and salted almonds. Brilliant and tense fusion of peat and sherry. With water: some very old balsamic, pork scratchings, iodine and natural tar. Mouth: brilliant, powerful arrival that also carries clear complexity with it. Many salty, gamey and umami notes, with lovely drying peat smoke too, but never dominating these wonderful, soft and plummy dark fruit notes that are clearly present too. With water: pristinely salty and earthy and wonderfully drying. Remains superbly tense, powerful and rigorously on smoked meats, sea salt, tar and soy sauce. Also herbal bitters and artichoke liqueur. Finish: very long, packing more of the same relentless salinity, earthy dryness, peppery and gamey meat notes and more bitter herbal qualities. Comments: outstanding sherried Port Ellen. Seems like Douglas Laing had many great sherry cask PEs. A profile that’s extremely hard to encounter in whiskies today.
SGP: 567 - 93 points. |
|
|
 |
Port Ellen 10 yo 1981/1992 (64%, Cadenhead ‘Authentic Collection’ 150th Anniversary, for Preiss Import, California) 
Colour: pale white wine. Nose: more closed and compact, which is to be expected, these super high strength versions are rarely as expressive the older ones. This one displays a rather austere salinity, with hints of ink, wool, lemon juice and concrete. Water is required… With water: getting a bit weird now, on inks, graphite, plastic, burning newspaper and a slightly farmy touch. Mouth: very tough! Some sense of peaty purity as hoped for, but also a rather brutal austerity that again brings to mind concrete, chalk, clay and beach pebbles. Also a little plasticine and vinyl. With water: carbolic acid, lemonade, chalk, paraffin, ointments, tar - extreme in the extreme! Finish: long, hyper-drying, ashy, aggressively salty and again this feeling of brutalist austerity. Comments: not too sure about this one. It’s a little all over the shop, within this very narrow and tough profile. If that makes any sense.
SGP: 268 - 84 points. |
|
|
 |
Port Ellen 12 yo 1983/1995 (57.1%, Cadenhead ‘Authentic Collection’) 
Colour: white wine. Nose: back to the much more familiar and comforting purity that these production years display when at their best. Stunning freshness at first, full of citrus fruits, coastal air, beach sand, pebbles, coastal flowers and mineral salts. The peat is more elegant and intricate too, a slightly more aromatic and brittle style of peat smoke that I’m used to in young, early 80s Port Ellen. With time it’s getting a bit saltier and little more petrolic and precise. With water: is it possible to have such a thing as ‘complex saltiness’? Really, saline and citric, but full of tiny mineral notes, medical tinctures, cooking oils, samphire, gentian, clay. A rather hypnotic aromatic profile that keeps on developing… Mouth: gloriously pure, oily, peaty and coastal. Retaining this impression of power and freshness from the nose, adding in a few drops of lemon liqueur, eucalyptus oil and black olive tapenade. Also preserved lemons. I almost don’t want to add water, it’s just perfect. But we must do our duty for Whiskyfun! With water: holy moly! Opens up in stunning fashion! Getting broader, fatter in texture, full of smoked olive oil, ointments, medicinal herbs, seawater, grapefruit and lemon again, citrus liqueurs, paraffin and TCP. Finish: very, very long. Tar, peat soot, dried anchovies, capers and more preserved lemons clinging to your teeth for dear life! Comments: A whisky that starts out brilliant, then seems to just improve leaps and bounds with each step. Amazing development and continually captivating.
SGP: 566 - 93 points. |
|
|
 |
Port Ellen 15 yo 1981/1996 (62.6%, The Whisky Connoisseur, Cask Master Selection No.3, cask #1391) 
Colour: pale straw. Nose: Pure tar, pickling brine, dirty martini, beach bonfire, gherkins, capers, anchovy paste and green olives. Also an almost solvent-tinged peat profile which is just great. With water: wonderfully deep and fat, full of hessian and camphor impressions, smoked olive oil, grapefruit peel and cough medicine. Mouth: superb arrival, with amazing fatness of texture, which carries the alcohol very effortlessly. Many more tarry, camphor and thick peaty impressions. Aniseed, salted liquorice, soy sauce and pure seawater with lemon juice. With water: even more precise, hones in on this very fresh, mineral and coastal profile, riddled with thick peat smoke, tar, medicinal embrocations and seawater. Finish: very long, once again! Brilliantly peaty, pure, oily, tarry, medicinal and yet still with some lively citrus notes in the mix. Comments: brilliant young(ish) Port Ellen. It manages to juggled fatness and tension in an amazing and compelling way. Young Islay whiskies today tend to lack this depth and fatness I find.
SGP: 567 - 92 points. |
|
|
 |
Port Ellen 18 yo 1980/1998 (62.2%, Cadenhead ‘Authentic Collection’, 312 bottles) 
Colour: white wine. Nose: magnificent! A similar profile but on the cusp of greater age and maturity, and with that comes greater complexity in this case. Beautiful notes of fresh citrus fruits with the expected, and really emphatic, notes of seawater, tar, petrol, iodine and wet kelp. Boiler smoke, aniseed distillate, fennel and chilli sausage, waxed canvas and tarred rope. Totally brilliant! With water: a pure coastal profile now, with waxed lemons, fresh oysters, dried herbs, delicate briny qualities. Wonderful development and complexity. Mouth: again, this sense of purity married with fatness. Pure, vivid and sharp peaty flavours, with coastal and mineral purity, but also an oiliness and thickness of texture in the mouth which is fantastic. Again lemons, limes and grapefruit with even one or two tropical glimmers as well. With water: back to more tarry and peaty power and precision. Still this sense of fatness with more petrol, impressions of smoked olive oil, camphor, iodine and oily sheep wool. Finish: very long! Really dense peat smoke coating the palate. Also lemon and herbal notes, verbena, menthol touches and gentian. Comments: I don’t know 1980 Port Ellens too well, but this one is sensational. What I increasingly realise about these teenage Port Ellens is the combination of purity of flavour and fatness of texture is what really stands them apart.
SGP: 467 - 93 points. |
|
|
You know what we need after all those intense and extremely powerful Port Ellens? Some nice, refreshing Ardbegs… |
|
|
 |
Ardbeg 1974/1992 (43%, Dun Eideann, Auxil Import France, casks #2026-2030, 3,800 bottles) 
A good example of the kind of rather simple bottling that was made relatively affordably available by early independents and helped slowly but surely shift popular attention onto single malts. Also, very much an artefact from the ‘age of innocence’ when people thought nothing of putting out a sherry matured 1974 Ardbeg in a side-series like this at 43%. How times have changed… Colour: amber. Nose: even at 43%, this immense power of 70s Ardbeg comes through. A stunning mix of fusel oils, pure tar extracts, hessian and a deep, rather sweetish and highly medicinal-tinged peat smoke. Wonderfully dense and aromatic with iodine, dunnage warehouse and heavy camphor all emerging. This is all without even mentioning the sherry, which is really beautifully integrated to the point that you almost don’t notice it, although it is certainly there adding wonderful salty and earthy notes beneath all that stunning peat smoke. Mouth: huge whisky for 43%! Stunningly dry, earthy and tarry peat, full of textural, slightly grubby smoky qualities, black pepper, iodine drops, old rope and oily hessian cloth impressions. I also find many medicinal roots and herbs such as gentian, wormwood and verbena. Also deeply earthy aged black teas. A deceptively complex and hypnotic whisky, even though the dominant impression is of a highly singular, perfect fusion of sherry and peat into one profile. Finish: stunningly long, pristinely salty, herbal, bitter, drying, earthy and immensely rich with thick peat smoke, black pepper and yet more of these wonderfully tarry rope and camphor notes. Comments: the distance between trying old Ardbegs such as this grows greater each year, yet almost each and every occasion is a sledgehammer reminder of just what an astonishing and endlessly idiosyncratic whisky this distillery created during these years. This humble little bottling is up there with some of the best.
SGP: 567 - 93 points. |
|
|
 |
Ardbeg 1975/2002 (46.2%, OB for Clan des Grandes Malts, cask #4701, sherry hogshead, 252 bottles) 
A very rare official single cask for France! Let’s see how it handles after that brilliant wee 1974. Colour: orangey amber. Nose: amazing how there are such obvious similarities, but this is altogether more about precision and focus, whereas the 1974 was broader and more open in its immediate profile, perhaps due to being a multi-cask vatting and bottled at 43%. This is very narrowly on a stunning mix of iodine and tarry Ardbeg peat smoke. Once again you have the feeling that the sherry cask influence is there, but it’s so deeply entwined and bound up with the distillate that it’s hard to even notice them as separate forces. This one also displays a greater impression of sweetness and concentration, a feeling of herbal cough syrups liqueurs made of gentian and tar. There’s a global touch of fragility to this nose, but it remains hypnotic and undeniably gorgeous. Mouth: a little slow but the progression in the mouth builds and builds to a stunningly thick, peaty crescendo. Syrupy sweet, while also drying herbal and peppery at the same time; one of those whiskies that feels like it should not make sense on paper, the things it is able to achieve simultaneously. Deeply oily, tarry and with an almost fatty, glistening peat presence on the palate. Finish: wonderfully long, stunningly herbal and peaty, perfectly bitter, and showcasing all the expected medicines, tars, wee earthy and meaty notes and this gorgeously tarry aftertaste. Comments: I am going back and forth between these two Ardbegs and they are both subtly different but also so close in their brilliance. I adore the breadth of character in the Dun Eideann, but this one carries and little extra precision and power with it. Both are exceptional reminders of just what a unique and world class spirit 70s Ardbeg was.
SGP: 577 - 94 points. |
|
|
 |
Ardbeg 19 yo 1975/1995 (47.3%, Cadenhead, Authentic Collection) 
Colour: pale gold. Nose: under the bonnet of the same distillate without any sherry, or even any obvious wood really. Pure medicinal embrocations with many cough syrups, herbal inclusions, tarred rope, whole warehouses of hessian and things like tiger balm, vapour rubs and Bonjella mouth antiseptic. It also has this superb element of varnish, resinous fir wood and salt cured fish. And all that before we even mention this totally glorious old school Ardbeg peatiness. Mouth: this naturally lower cask strength reveals amazing complexity in this spirit, emphatically tarry and peaty as expected, but also many tiny tertiary flavours. Old pressed flowers, dried out old honey, face cream, olive oil, broiled shellfish, crystallised orange, cocktail bitters, aniseed… the list goes on. It’s just a shame the sample I have is rather tiny because you really feel this is the sort of dram that you could sip and analyse in the small hours. Finish: medium, fatty, tarry, full of drying peppery peat, herbal liqueurs and many subtle medicinal embrocations. Comments: the softer side 1970s Ardbeg, but a bit of a revelation in terms of all that complexity on display. An irrepressible and brilliant distillate.
SGP: 466 - 92 points. |
|
|
 |
Ardbeg 20 yo 1975/1995 (51.8%, Cadenhead, Authentic Collection) 
Colour: pale gold. Nose: amazing similarity, and yet, clear difference. The peat is almost gelatinous and dominating here. Coal tar soap, animal fats, hessian, TCP, iodine drops, pure camphor, tarred rope and richly smoked olive oil. There’s also lemon oil, white mushroom and even wee tropical touches beginning to emerge, which we don’t often find in Ardbeg. With water: a tiny bit of Port Ellen cosplay going on with some slightly ‘dirty’ notes of creel nets and boiler smoke. But otherwise, it’s tarry rope and dry, peppery peat galore! Mouth: surprisingly, it’s the salinity which takes immediate centre stage. Stunningly precise, coastal, salty and full of shellfish broth, Maggi, soy sauce, horseradish and salt-baked cod. Then the peat and medicinal components really begin to emerge in force, also more lemon oil, more tiny wee exotic fruits and things like crystallised honey and classical waxes. With water: magnificent, all of the above but only more so. Stunning and quite breath-taking. Finish: another one that’s extremely long, really getting in the quantum realm of tar, peat, medicine, herbs and shoreline ‘vibes’. Comments: you tend to run out of descriptors and superlatives a bit when tasting 1970s Ardbeg of this calibre. 1970s Ardbeg: 1 English language: Nil.
SGP: 577 - 94 points. |
|
|
 |
Ardbeg 27 yo 1972/2000 (50%, Douglas Laing 'Old Malt Cask’, 238 bottles) 
Colour: gold. Nose: older and more concentrated. These 1972s tend to involve something of the softer and more enigmatic characteristics of 60s Ardbeg in my view (alas, no known examples of Ardbeg from 1970 or 1971 were ever bottled, to my knowledge). So, we have a totally stunning fusion of thick, rich peat smoke, crystallised honey that verges on aged mead, pure tar extracts, very old herbal liqueurs and many layers of camphor, antiseptic, aniseed, iodine and the brilliant medley of mentholated notes and dried herbs. With water: camphor and herbal medicines and liqueurs galore. Decades old Drambuie diluted with cask strength 1950s Talisker! Mouth: quite simply, the nose in molten, sippable form! Only I’d add there’s a sublime umami and salty savoury streak that runs through everything. The peat is drier and even more powerful. There’s a whole slurry of bandages, antiseptic, TCP, cough syrups and ointments. Then that formidable, relentless tarriness that just keeps on asserting itself over and over at each stage. With water: it brings back these honeyed tones and ideas of mead, liqueurs, old Chartreuse, copper coins, Bakelite, clay, camphor, fennel seed and turmeric. Finish: deep, extremely long and profoundly rich, thick and peaty. Comments: If you put STR staves under my fingernails, I might just admit that 1972 is my favourite Ardbeg vintage. The research continues though…
SGP: 467 - 94 points. |
|
|
Heartfelt bear hugs to KC, Aaron and the folks at the Golden Promise! |
|
|
Happy birthday Whiskyfun! |
|
|
|
July 26, 2024 |
|
  |
The Olympic Sessions, around the World, 2
Starting from France, as usual. Come visit France and admire our stadiums, landscapes, distilleries, the new Bugatti Tourbillon and the last true Trotskyists in the world! They are raised at (very) great expense mainly for tourists. French Trotskyist are very amusing with their shabby clothes, colourful language, constant yelling and perpetually angry expressions, you’ll see. And rest assured, they are not contagious. In fact, we are fond of them as much as we’re fond of Sartre, Derrida and vin rouge (which is kind of the same thing, mescaline having fallen out of fashion since Sartre anyway). (AFP). |
 |

|
Artesia ‘Fût Noir Char #3’ (46%, OB, France, +/-2023) 
Finished in deeply charred wood, but not quite 'alligator'. We recently sampled another excellent Artesia from northern France. Colour: gold. Nose: delightful, with notes of apple and lemon, a hint of coconut, some mango and banana, vanilla, a touch of new wood and foliage, and there you have it. Mouth: you can sense the effect of the heavily charred wood, making the spirit softer and fruitier. Vanilla, banana, apple, plums, gooseberries, with hints of cider and mild beer. Finish: long and more herbal, which surely isn’t from the extreme charring. The mystery deepens… The end of the finish is fruitier, with apples taking the lead. An apple a day keeps… Comments: there’s quite a bit of buzz around these 'deep-charred' woods globally. But it’s rather fun…
SGP:551 - 82 points. |
ndeed, this one is really intriguing... |

|
Mackmyra 15 yo 2008/2023 (55.4%, Alambic Classique, Sweden, Double Matured Selection, Cuba rum barrel, cask #23022, 229 bottles) 
It's rather intriguing that Alambic chose a Mackmyra, but couldn’t this be the finest Mackmyra in the world? The second maturation in rum lasted no less than six years. Colour: pale gold. Nose: I'm not entirely sure; grapefruit, clay, porridge, banana peels, sweet paprika (light goulash) … It’s genuinely intriguing. With water: well, raw wool, clay, sourdough. Not much movement. The Cuban part isn't quite from Chucho Valdés! Mouth (neat): not certain, it’s a bit dissonant. Quite a strong bitter and herbal side. Ozzy sings Bach. With water: it’s alright, it’s pleasant, softer, a bit saltier too, but I don’t quite grasp the point of this bottle. Finish: long, a bit bitter, not very pleasant, despite the lovely lemon in the aftertaste. Comments: phew, that's a relief, as all the other recent Alambic bottles we've tasted have been very superlative (ah, the Ben Nevis!) and thus nearly superhuman. They’re humans, after all. Conclusion: strictly no one bottles only absolute splendours, and that’s perfectly fine.
SGP:362 - 78 points. |

|
|
Penderyn 13 yo 2010/2023 (59.5%, OB, Wales, LMDW New Vibrations, second fill bourbon, cask #313/2010) 
In my very humble opinion, Penderyn is one of the distilleries that has made the most progress. Who remembers the first batches? Hmm… Colour: white wine. Nose: it’s amusing! Toothpaste and limoncello, very ripe fresh mangoes, Wrigley’s Juicy Fruit, vitamin C tablets (Berocca from Bayer, probably deadly - of course not), then forty tonnes of vineyard peaches. I seem to recall they used to use stainless steel during distillation, which doesn’t seem to be the case anymore when you 'nose' this lovely juice. With water: gentle clays and elegantly honeyed touches. Mouth (neat): it’s fruity like a Bushmills malt. Blood oranges, papayas, mangoes, passion fruits, pink grapefruit… With water: quite magnificent, you just need to enjoy your whiskies excessively fruity. Finish: medium length, exuberant fruits, but a more herbal structure to keep everything in check. Comments: a taster who tastes a lot (perhaps a bit too much) will always be attracted to somewhat extreme whiskies, as their greatest fear is boredom. This may not be the case for a ‘street drinker’. But let’s be honest, it’s a magnificent Penderyn.
SGP:751 - 88 points. |
Last time, we had the Gold Cock from the Czech Republic, and now, here's the Drunk Cats! |

|
Drunk Cats go to Switzerland (49.4%, OB, Old Well whisky, Svach, Czech Republic, Cream sherry finish, 430 bottles, 2023) 
I can’t quite recall the exact details of this one, other than it’s a Bohemian whisky, and perhaps I’m better off not knowing. It’s a sort of Czech-Andalusian-Swiss collaboration. Colour: gold. Nose: well, yes, it rather works. Orange cake, fig jam, muesli (hoppla Geisss), Jaffa cake… With water: no. New rubber boots, rather out of context. Mouth (neat): to be honest, this gets really strange. Bay leaves, rubber, a touch of sulphur… With water: turns a bit bitter while staying syrupy. Not a fan of this. Finish: long, rubbery. Comments: cats are odd creatures. Certainly, that’s true of the five mousers we have at WF HQ (Soba, Perle, P’tit Noir, Tigrou, P’tit Blanc-et-Noir), all absolute geniuses, of course. Thank goodness they don’t drink our Brora. Anyway, this feline whisky seems quite ‘artisanal’. It has its good sides, mind you, and it mostly seems to be a bottle ‘for fun’. One can’t be against that.
SGP:462 - 70 points. |

|
St. Killian 2017/2024 ‘Small Batch Unpeated’ (52.4%, OB, Germany, double maturation PX and bourbon) 
We’ve had some splendid St. Killians already. Colour: gold. Nose: it’s successful, quite fresh and direct, with a menthol note, fennel, bitter orange, and flat-leaf parsley… It smells like PX seco, and if that’s the case, I bow with deference and envy. I adore PX seco as much as I find PX dulce often vulgar and tiresome. With water: similar, with a few drops of Fanta (our apologies). Mouth (neat): very good! Curry, grey pepper, chilli, honey, blood orange juice, pink pepper… It has an ‘Indian restaurant’ vibe, to be honest, and no, we won’t make RW’s joke about ‘paperback raita’. With water: even creamier, with peach liqueur but also leaves, stems, and pits making it a bit bitter. Finish: long, herbal, a bit salty and peppery. Not the easiest part. Comments: very high highs and a few lower lows. The initial nose was quite superb.
SGP:461 - 82 points. |
One last one to finish (pleonasm alert, S.) |

|
St. Killian 2017-2018/2024 ‘Small Batch Peated’ (62.3%, OB, Germany, 455 bottles) 
Hungarian oak (Ungarische Eiche), they say, but is Trump’s buddy V.O. really our friend? (whaaaat? Oh come on, S.) Colour: deep gold. Nose: we knew this would work in our book. Heavily mentholated and piney mango jam, rubber boots and trainers, brake pads, heavy thyme oil. With water: pine needles and cones, in megatistic quantities. Mouth (neat): extreme and awesome. Heavy doom black soviet metal (whatever) in a bottle, with megatons of ashes. With water: that famous full ashtray. Very extreme, piney, ashy, salty… Finish: perhaps one of the longest ever, but it’s full of bitterness. Crazy green walnuts and craziest bitter oranges. We even like this. Comments: utter madness. Be warned, don't drink this when you're alone; it's like while scuba diving, never alone.
SGP:576 - 85 points. |
Current Medal Standing
(July 26, Updated Daily) |
|
 |
Gold |
|
UK
Bimber ‘Wimbledon’ (56.6%, OB, England, The Spirit of the Underground, Vino de Naranja cask, cask #310/5, 298 bottles, 2024) |
Silver |
|
UK
Penderyn 13 yo 2010/2023 (59.5%, OB, Wales, LMDW New Vibrations, second fill bourbon, cask #313/2010) |
Bronze |
|
Italy
Exmu ‘Spirit of Sardinia’ (45.5%, OB, Italy, bourbon, +/-2024) |
|
July 25, 2024 |
|
  |
The Olympic Sessions Day 1, a new bag of whiskies from around the world (almost) |

|
Here we go again on a journey with some world whiskies… And we start again with France. I don't know if you've been told, but we've just kicked off the Olympics here in France - the official ceremony will take place tomorrow - so we thought we could organise our own events, just for a bit of fun, with whiskies from around the world. |
That said, I don't know how long it will last—several days for sure—but maybe we'll get tired quite quickly and need some more high-quality Scottish sessions again. We'll see. So, are you game? (Well, that was joking close to the ground, S.) |

|
Rozelieures ‘Fumé Collection’ (46%, OB, France, +/-2023) 
A smoky Rozelieures matured in Fino sherry (hurray). Rozelieures is made in the neighbouring Lorraine and is among the pioneers of French whisky. It’s now quite a sizeable whisky distillery, although they employ Charentais stills (cognac stills) but handle their own malting. Many are making malt whisky in France, but very few are using proper ‘Scottish style’ pot stills. Colour: light gold. Nose: it’s fresh, nicely peated but also on apple and citrus, all very well-balanced, pleasant, somewhat inoffensive, but we weren’t expecting Brora 1972 or Ardbeg 1974, were we? A few hints of green walnut, likely from the fino. Long live fino! (I insist). Mouth: all is well, still quite fresh, smokier than on the nose, a bit more on herbal and hay smoke, then indeed on fresh walnuts from the fino, plus the usual pepper and salt. Lovely aromatic precision. Finish: medium length but with increased salinity. Some little apples to distil. Comments: I find it technically quite perfect; I imagine it’s had a few years in the cask.
SGP:454 - 84 points. |

|
Gold Cock 'Peated' (45%, OB, Czech Republic, +/-2023) 
What a laugh we've had since we first heard of this brand over 20 years ago! It became a bit of a running joke amongst enthusiasts, gifting it to each other for a chuckle. There's certainly a market for these kinds of jests. That said, we’ve only tasted Gold Cock once, a 3-year-old produced around 2003. It was a bit challenging back then (WF 45 - but we had a good laugh!), but they’ve likely improved things over twenty years, so let’s see… after all, the cock is the emblem of our country, isn’t it? Colour: gold. Nose: quite likeable, there are ginger cookies, turmeric and paprika cream, a bit of honey and vanilla, quite a lot of elderflowers, rosemary and some barbecue smoke… not bad at all, quite different from your average peated whisky. Mouth: it’s funny and pleasant. A smoky sawdust character that works well, developing mainly on lemon and fresh ginger. Finish: good length, nice freshness, a touch of mustard, lemon liqueur and a light curry. Comments: Gold Cock is made by Jelinek, I think I’ve sampled some of their products from the Iron Curtain days. Anyway, the Gold Cock brand has come a long way in twenty years, + 37 points.
SGP:555 - 82 points. |

|
Fary Lochan 'Sherry & Peat Batch #001' (50.5%, OB, Denmark, oloroso & Islay hogshead, 600 bottles, 2023) 
The whiskies from Fary Lochan are often quite amusing and certainly unusual. That said, I haven't tasted many. Colour: golden amber. Nose: varnish and roasted nuts, fresh peat, a bit of mild cheese (gouda, cheddar), then baked peppers and smoked meats. When I told you it could be special... the pepper side is very impressive. With water: redcurrants and damp earth, Italian black cigars, machine grease... Mouth (neat): a very 'rye' side, pumpernickel, pecan pie, and above all, lots of smoky brown beer. With water: increasingly unusual, but lovely all the same. Cynar, Fernet Branca... Finish: medium length but very nice peppery bitterness. Cloves, smoked paprika, peppers glazed in wine... Comments: lovely and, above all, not boring for a moment.
SGP:563 - 85 points. |

|
Sall 3 yo 2020/2023 (61.1%, Whisky Watcher, Denmark, bourbon, cask #29, 159 bottles) 
The barrel came from Garrison Brothers’, which isn’t bad news. It is our first Sall ever. colour: very pale white wine. nose: it’s like barley eau-de-vie, and we’re not complaining. It’s really not far from young kirsch, in fact. We appreciate that no one seemed to have the idea to tamper with this almost-new-make, so it remains 100% natural. The bourbon cask was most likely ‘very refill’. With water: barley porridge, sweet mint, Gravensteiner apple, eau-de-vie... Mouth (neat): eau-de-vie all the way. Mirabelle plum, service tree berry, holly, plus a touch of lemon juice, pear juice, and just a tiny bit of very discreet vanilla. With water: excellent barley eau-de-vie, pears and apples, hints of beer... finish: medium length, lovely fruitiness, lovely balance. comments: they also make a lot of gin at Sall, like pretty much everyone else on this planet. Even we at Château WF made our own gin. Not saying we drink it, mind you...
SGP:641 - 84 points. |

|
Sall 3 yo (60.6%, OB, ex-bourbon, Denmark, ex-Fondillon, 2024) 
Fondillon is a rare and somewhat posh wine from Alicante. I have no idea about the (possible) relationship between a Fondillon cask and a young Danish distillery. Not sure the little photo of the bottle matches either, but here we go. Colour: gold. nose: I should add that I’ve never tasted Fondillon. Soft, vanilla malt with sweet beer, grilled malt, and a basket of raisin bread. It’s nice, quite inoffensive, but yes, nice. Hints of orange liqueur. With water: more sweet and fruity ale. Sweet beer and pear juice. Mouth (neat): lovely power, figs, sultanas, touches of caramel, praline… With water: aged pear eau-de-vie in very well-matured wood. Old pear aged in wood, it’s pleasant and quite rare, except in Calvados, notably Domfrontais. Finish: quite long, malty, fresh, fruity, on sweet beer, IPA etc. Comments: my first Fondillon! Certainly, it was blended with whisky here but still. Very lovely very young whisky.
SGP:641 - 83 points. |

|
Exmu ‘Spirit of Sardinia’ (45.5%, OB, Italy, bourbon, +/-2024)
All is good, 200-hour fermentation, direct-fired stills, very local barley... and Sardinia, of course. Colour: gold. Nose: one could have called this session ‘50 shades of cereals’. Superb combination of vanilla and papaya, stems and leaves, small touches of camphor, dill, lemongrass, a tiny bit of cellulosic varnish, little orange sweets... All of this is perfect, precise, and fresh, and even downright impressive. My first Exmu and I hope it won’t be the last. Mouth: magnificent fruitiness, mangoes, pink bananas, old white wine, nuts, sweet pepper, Szechuan pepper... But what is this thing? Finish: and here comes the mango, with a touch of liquorice wood. A very light hint of viognier and even lychee. Comments: bravo the Italians, they have more luck with their whiskies than with their football (we the French too, having said that).
SGP: 641 - 88 points. |

|
Bimber ‘Wimbledon’ (56.6%, OB, England, The Spirit of the Underground, Vino de Naranja cask, cask #310/5, 298 bottles, 2024) 
They are truly geniuses at Bimber, as they managed to anticipate the victory of a Spaniard, Carlos Alcaraz, at Wimbledon this year by housing this baby in an orange (the fruit, not the style) wine cask that one would doubt wasn’t Spanish. It seems this is a genuine double maturation, with three years or more in this orange wine cask. We must admit, we’re very curious... Colour: full gold. Nose: you do find orange, but you find orange or orange cake or Jaffa cake in many malt whiskies. It almost gives it a little natural Dalmore touch. With water: indeed, orange cake and a slight IPA note. Mouth (neat): a creamy side, certainly very marmalade-like, but without being too vulgar, there's a certain balance maintained. The chocolate really adds a very pronounced liquid Jaffa cake note. Of some sort. With water: it feels like a bourbon cask is responding, with banana, vanilla, and quince. The balance is even more... balanced (bravo, S.). Finish: rather long, this time with Szechuan pepper. It was to be expected. Comments: I like this ‘travel’ aspect. After all, many journeys start with a ride on the Underground. I’m also very happy not to have a Bimber ‘Waterloo’ – or ‘Trafalgar’ – in the WF sample library. Of course, I’m jesting.
SGP: 641 - 88 points. |
The entire planet now produces good, even very good whisky, which is quite impressive. See you soon for more whiskies from around the world. In the old days, it was very rare for a 'world whisky' to score 80 on my personal scale. |
Current Medal Standing
(July 25, Updated Daily) |
|
 |
Gold |
|
UK
Bimber ‘Wimbledon’ (56.6%, OB, England, The Spirit of the Underground, Vino de Naranja cask, cask #310/5, 298 bottles, 2024) |
Silver |
|
Italy
Exmu ‘Spirit of Sardinia’ (45.5%, OB, Italy, bourbon, +/-2024) |
Bronze |
|
DenmarK
Fary Lochan 'Sherry & Peat Batch #001' (50.5%, OB, Denmark, oloroso & Islay hogshead, 600 bottles, 2023) |
|
July 24, 2024 |
|
  |
A little hotch-potch of blends (Everyone is blending!)
I suppose it is always interesting to be able to offer your own brand without relying too much on specific distilleries, while staying as much as possible in the world of malt, the most valued.
|

Cactus in Corsica, photo by Christophe A., July 2024 |

|
Scallywag ‘The Chocolate Edition’ (48%, Douglas Laing, blended malt, Port finish, 2024) 
An assemblage of Speyside whiskies designed to pair with chocolate, much like malts offered to accompany cigars. Note, this has nothing to do with the use of ‘chocolate malt.’ Colour: gold. Nose: we’re greeted with a strong sense of dark, malty beer, reminiscent of Guinness, and a hint of Linzertorte, likely due to the Port influence. Quite pleasant, and it doesn’t come off as a malt with a mere layer of Port—thankfully. Mouth: the palate leans more towards wine, with clear notes of Port, black cherry, strawberries, roasted malt, and indeed, chocolate. Think along the lines of chocolates filled with orange—rather delightful. Finish: Rather long and more peppery, with flavours of redcurrant jelly and bitter chocolate. Comments: It has a bit of a premix vibe, but it's well-crafted and doesn’t clash. No screeches.
SGP:541 - 83 points. |

|
St. Bridget’s Kirk ‘Solera Batch #2’ (48.4%, Hannah Whisky Merchants, blended malt, oloroso finish, 214 bottles, 2024) 
Apparently, there's more than just Oloroso here. We really enjoyed the first batch (WF 87). Colour: gold. Nose: this isn’t too far removed from the style of Scallywag, with notes of red fruits, raspberry liqueur, and more raisins, making it fruitier and, of course, less chocolatey. In the background, the usual nuts, a touch of smoke and a maritime character without excess, hinting at Orkney. Mouth: more tense, certainly peated and lemony, slightly salty, leaning more towards Skye than Orkney on the palate. A hint of turpentine and lime that’s a bit surprising, even tequila-like, while the Oloroso doesn’t come off as hyper-mega-first fill, if you catch my drift. Finish: long and still curiously lemony, even quite acidic with grapefruit. Comments: a very lovely composition, a bit surprising here and there but that’s part of its charm. Almost makes you want to put it back in a small cask for a few more months to marry further.
SGP:564 - 85 points. |

|
Turntable 'Track #4 – One Way or Another' (46%, OB, blended Scotch, 2024) 
Blondie, of course! It’s a bit private but I remember so well when my dad used to bring back records from the States, while they were not available here yet. I particularly remember Television, Talking Heads and, naturally, Blondie. And Cherry Vanilla, but that’s another story. I'm gonna get ya, get ya, get ya, get ya… Colour: white wine. Nose: it’s light, fruity, and grainy, with vanilla and a play of orange juice, and a rather discreet malt. Banana and pear candies, cassata, and even a hint of young Cuban rum. Mouth: citrus juices, kiwi, liquorice allsorts, and small red fruits. It’s very civilised. Finish: of medium length, with a touch of fresh mint that’s quite ‘mojito’. The red fruits return, along with blood oranges at the very end. Comments: very pleasant ‘for a blend’. Refreshing for the summer, very well made.
SGP:630 - 83 points. |

|
Turntable ‘Bittersweet Symphony’ (46%, OB, blended Scotch, 2023) 
Everyone thinks of The Verve, but really, it’s still the Stones. Colour: pale amber. Nose: very lovely, I find, with walnut broth, seaweed, dry and sweet sherries, cherry stem tisane, and old PX with more wood, yet without any issue. I quite like this nose. Mouth: perhaps a bit less coherent but still very pleasant, with oranges, honey, raisins, and a bit of a feeling of Malaga aged statically (without solera). Finish: the return of slightly bitter walnuts, it’s rare for an ex-sherry to not smell of walnut at all, in my humble opinion. Raisins and liquorice at the end. Comments: so, The Verve or the Stones? The Stones!
SGP:641 - 85 points. |
One last little Turntable, it's impossible to resist... |

|
Turntable 'Track #5 – Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger’ (59.1%, OB, blended Scotch, 2024) 
Par mes compatriotes de Daft Punk, bien sûr! Colour: straw. Nose: more malty and even more citrusy, and undoubtedly more to my taste. Lovely citrons and mandarins, pink grapefruit, mangoes, a hint of wax, and a touch of clay... It's perfect. With water: some ripe pear notes, a sign of youth. Turns out we quite like pear. Mouth (neat): almost the same on the palate, citrus, chalk, paraffin, beeswax... With water: even more vivacious. Very nice malty character, and still waxy with a slight chalky touch. Finish: of medium length, fresh, with a smooth grain, which we always enjoy in a blend. It just loses a bit of tension (and a point, dura Lex, sed Lex). Comments: I'm rather a fan of this one.
SGP:551 - 86 points. |

|
Dad’s Dram (56%, The Whisky Exchange, blended malt, 2024) 
A vatting of Highland and Speyside malts. Of course, I’m late once more, but anyway, alas my dear father has been missing for quite a few years. And he didn’t really drink much whisky (he thought Southern Comfort was whisky, which says it all). Colour: straw. Nose: very lovely notes of fresh tree bark, sesame oil, lanolin, then fruit peels and small apples from an old apple tree in an old orchard in a nearly forgotten little village (sob). With water: moving towards wet chalk and sourdough. It's a classic and very pleasant development. Mouth (neat): it's much sweeter and herbaceous at the same time. We’ll mention, once again, limoncello (where’s the bl**dy Ferrari?) then dill and lemongrass. With water: same profile, just a bit sweeter, on syrups and wildflower honey. Toffee apple. Finish: medium length but with lovely freshness. Apple and lemon, 2/3 – 1/3. Comments: one should think of their father every day (take notice, kids).
SGP:551 - 87 points. |

|
Hogshead Import 18 yo 2005/2023 (45.5%, Hogshead Import, Blended Scotch, refill butt, 614 bottles) 
Let's say it again and again, the more malt, the better. I know it's fashionable to say that this is often not the case and that these are just beliefs, but we stick to that. Colour: gold. Nose: almond croissant, a bit of milk chocolate, fudge and toffee, nougat, vanilla cream, and a touch of burnt wood... All is well, it's soft and very pleasant. Mouth: you get a bit of the old grain, with that lychee and sweet varnish side, banana cream, and a slightly light texture, but the malt seems to keep control, so it doesn't feel too diluted. A small glass of IPA and some sweeter molasses (does that exist?). Finish: not very long but sweet and gentle. Banana liqueur, apple juice, and a bit of pink pepper. Comments: a very, very good blend (top 5%), just the body is a tiny bit thin, in my humble opinion. But it's a blend...
SGP:531 - 85 points. |

|
The Fife Blend 15 yo ‘Release #1’ (56.3%, James Eadie, blended scotch, 458 bottles, 2024) 
If it’s James Eadie, they’ve likely done a significant job on the casks. There are always surprises, generally good ones. Colour: darker gold. Nose: I find the grain dominates a bit, as if it’s been boosted, with ripe bananas and guavas. Of course, we have nothing against ripe bananas and guavas. A bit of vanilla cream, almond syrup, touches of fresh wood… With water: correction, almond syrup and pistachio syrup. Killer stuff. Mouth (neat): it’s extremely unusual and frankly, it feels like rum and pisco territories. A hint of asparagus and fresh sugar cane, bitter almonds, woodruff, amaro… I think I’ve never tasted a whisky like this, but it’s also extremely entertaining. With water: Spanish liqueurs (I know what I’m trying to say), curaçao and ‘parfait amour’, coconut milk and probably a slightly light backbone, but compensated by all these exotic flavours. Finish: not very long but that’s the grain’s fault. Comments: a bit crazy, extroverted, impressive, deviant, seductive. Clearly a rum side. How to score this…
SGP:730 – 83 points (but don’t take that too seriously). |

|
Johnnie Walker ‘Red Label’ (40%, OB, blend, +/-2024) 
Last tasting, 2018, not bad at all (WF 78). Ah, a bottle of Johnnie Walker Red Label procured from Carrefour at a rather tempting €15.99, while they recommend this enticing cocktail called the ‘Johnnie Ginger’: fill a glass with ice, add 25 millilitres of Johnnie Walker Red Label, a squeeze of lemon juice, and top it off with ginger ale, garnished with whatever you've got handy in the kitchen (do be cautious about what goes into your kitchen, mind you!). But let’s taste it au naturel, shall we? These brands pushing cocktails—might they be hinting that their whiskies aren’t good enough when enjoyed neat? Colour: Gold. Nose: there’s a touch of Clynelish waxiness, I’d say, along with fresh bread and barley syrup. Think panettone, focaccia, croissants, and pear peelings... quite pleasing! Mouth: well, yes, quite agreeable, and I’d even fancy a 100-proof version if one exists (my knowledge of the full Johnnie Walker range is a bit rusty, I must admit). Lovely little salty-smoky tension, sweet ‘industrial’ apple juice, a hint of liquorice and anise, a slight earthy note, followed by growing salinity. Finish: not even that short. But, of course, as with all entry-level blends, the finish is its Achilles' heel, drifting towards a cardboardy note—though not overly so. A hint of pear liqueur. Comments: honestly, I’m not sure if I’ve landed a particularly stellar batch (this is actually a bottle I purchased incognito in Scotland with my modest savings), but I really do like it.
SGP:652 - 79 points. |

|
Speyside Blended Malt 28 yo 1994/2022 (48.4%, The Whisky Blues and The Whisky Wave, cask #5138, hogshead, 235 bottles) 
The brand 'The Whisky Blues' has truly become a hallmark of quality across all spirits. Yet, with this type of blended malt, one must imagine that it is, in reality, a single malt. Now, we just need to figure out which one... Colour: gold. Nose: fresh bread, ripe banana, muesli, mirabelles, quinces, then candied lemons. It’s perfectly precise, impeccably delineated, and leans towards cédrat liqueur. This ultimate simplicity, very Balvenie-esque, is just fabulous after 28 years. Tiny touches of cactus. Mouth: well, of course. Green apple, stewed rhubarb, banana cake, mirabelle tarte, quince jelly, slightly underripe mango… It’s quite taut, it’s perfect. Finish: quite long, more on little lemon sweets. Comments: taut indeed and admirable. And it goes down so smoothly. It’s crazy that all these casks ended up on the market ‘like this’.
SGP:651 - 89 points. |
All right, a last one, an historical one… |

|
Usher’s Old Vatted Glenlivet (J.&G. Stewart ltd., Ditta Modena Import, Italy, +/-1955) 
Of course, the label boasts all these certificates of purity issued by more or less official laboratories, which was essential to distinguish it from the somewhat toxic moonshine produced here and there before the war. This is undoubtedly pre-WW2 distillate, bottled in 1952 or just after (note the 'appointment to H.M the Queen' on the label). Let's remember that Usher’s OVG was the seminal blend and that this isn’t the more common ‘Green Stripe’. Colour: gold, clear. Nose: naturally, there’s OBE, translating here into old metal (rusty old tools) and both dried meats and matured ham (jabugo). This lends a reinforced broth quality with honey, white wine, and… whisky. Add old herbal and citrus liqueurs, essentially everything you might find in grandad’s old sideboard. Mouth: yes, it’s alive and retains all its virtues! Lots of herbaceous peat heading towards pine liqueur, well-salted onion soup, old Chartreuse, mead, very old sweet sherry, salted beef marrow… It’s very impressive. Finish: long, even more saline, more on broths and mead. Comments: what a shame we can't precisely determine what was already present in the '50s and what’s the result of bottle ageing, though we do have a pretty good idea, don’t we? A bottle that was particularly splendid, many old blends are somewhat tired.
SGP:572 - 90 points. |
By the way, we have a tasting of a dozen old blends distilled before WWII in the pipeline. We had planned to publish it during the celebrations of the 80th anniversary of the Allied landing in Normandy, but you know how it is, we don't always get to do what we want when we're just small enthusiasts. |
|
July 23, 2024 |
|
  |
WF’s Little Duos, today hunting for mirabelles
So, Burnside, so, Balvenie, blended or not, only the official papers might know. We always enjoy tasting them, with their notes of mirabelle plum and quince that are so... well, Balvenie. Especially since these Burnsides have generally not undergone any finishing or in-cask blending with peated whisky, etc.
The picking of mirabelles, engraving, Art Deco, 1914
|
 |

|
Burnside 28 yo 1994/2022 (48%, Whisky Age, blended malt, hogshead, cask #5135, 224 bottles) 
A very charming little Beethoven by the artist MasonYin, which reminds me a bit of Sempé. Colour: white wine. Nose: pears, apples, mirabelles, and peaches at first, then quince, vanilla cream, and a slight earthy note of forest after the rain. One cannot help but think of white wine, indeed. Let’s say a southern Burgundy, like a Mâconnais. Very beautiful nose, simple and gentle. Mouth: perfect, rather taut, with white peach, greengages, quince, and lemon. Not much to add, it's a somewhat minimalist style and perhaps not very Beethovenian, but it’s very beautiful. Finish: medium length but with a vanilla that becomes more prominent. Then zest and cold green tea for a very refreshing finish. A tiny bit of salty liquorice, in the Dutch style, of which we could consume twelve kilos a day (if we didn't hold back). Comments: a little jewel of freshness and simple elegance. Ode to Joy, perhaps? All these 1994s are really very good.
SGP:651 - 89 points. |

|
Sideburn 31 yo 1992+1993/2024 (51.3%, Whisky Sponge, 404 bottles) 
Right, sideburn, so Burnside, got it? So, Balvenie. Colour: gold. Nose: we’re closer to Balvenie’s DNA, in truth, this could have been an official Balvenie of the same age, with all its attributes. Apricot tarte, tarte tatin, quince jelly, mirabelle jam, acacia honey, vanilla custard and all that. I need not say more. With water: notes of ‘a walk in the woods’, a drop of rainwater, some nougat, a tiny coconut ball, some broken branches, liquorice wood… Mouth (neat): creamy, with Earl Grey tea, rooibos tea, vanilla cream, cédrat liqueur, quince paste, green lemon juice (in tiny but noticeable quantities), a small piece of vanilla fudge… It’s funny, it’s rich and precise at the same time. With water: it’s a Balvenie truer than nature, with more white pepper and tea. And some tiny notes of sawdust and fresh vanilla (pods), then the quinces return with a few touches of fresh eau-de-vie, like kirsch. This time I don’t really find mirabelles, rather a bit of grated lemon zest and banana peel. Finish: a bit more herbal and with oolong tea. Grapefruit liqueur in the aftertaste. Comments: in the same league as the Whisky Age, perhaps just a tad more complex. Maybe that’s the multi-vintage ‘à la Sponge’ effect.
SGP:661 - 90 points. |
|
July 22, 2024 |
|
  |
On the hunt for Ben Nevis,
Part Cinq and last |

|
Water running down Ben Nevis. Whisky's about water - righ? (Ben Nevis) |
There was nothing in the flights we just did that did not confirm what we already thought about Ben Nevis and its successive periods. Despite the fact that some were good, even very good, we still believe that making heavily peated versions doesn’t necessarily make much sense. Not my business, but let’s preserve the distilleries’ DNA! That said, let’s not forget that distilleries that aren’t peated today could have been very peated in the past, like Bunnahabhain or Bruichladdich. Yes, it’s complicated… Especially as, by coincidence, we have saved some BN for this grand finale that might prove us wrong. Forget any certitudes… |

|
Ben Nevis 2015/2023 (59.9%, The Single Cask, Family Series, fresh sherry hogshead, 292 bottles) 
The label features a charming pooch, making me wonder if it truly reflects the bottle’s contents. Colour: dark amber. Nose: unbelievable amounts of salted liquorice and smoked meats, along with that heavily smoked barbecue sauce you find in Tennessee (or perhaps it’s Texas). It’s rich and robust, yet spectacular. Big peat. With water: fresh concrete, exhaust fumes, wet earth, leather, tobacco, mustard, and walnut wine. Mouth (neat): enormous, thick, very smoky, both sharp and sweet, with even more of that famous Texas-Tennessee barbecue sauce and at least forty tonnes of smoked salted almonds. Almonds, that's more California, isn’t it? With water: an abundance of salted caramel and liquorice. The most surprising thing is that the Ben Nevis DNA has managed to survive and even take the lead in the end. Few malts could achieve that in this context. Finish: very long, rich, still quite explosive, with more green nuts and leather. Absinthe. Comments: it’s so concentrated and beastly that with water and neutral alcohol, I’m sure you could make three bottles from one. The worst part is that I love this extreme side so much, I’m almost ashamed.
SGP:576 - 87 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 2012/2023 (54.5%, The Single Cask, Family Series, Laphroaig quarter casks, cask #1732, 116 bottles) 
Oh là là, Ben Nevis and Laphroaig, that’s probably like Frazier vs. Ali, or perhaps Lawler vs. MacDonald II. Let’s brace ourselves, but at this stage, there’s not much to lose, is there? Colour: white wine. Nose: this is really quite amusing, it seems like the two malts somewhat cancel each other out since it’s clear, pretty, pure, almost fresh, leaning towards oils (sunflower, sesame, and even paraffin) and freshly cut apple, with a very light smoke. What kind of sorcery is this? That said, water might change things... With water: no, it remains gentle, polite, civilised, with fresh barley, chalk, dough, touches of lanolin, and just a hint of creosote. Mouth (neat): on the palate, it’s a blended malt, honestly. In-cask blending, as we say at Château WF. Tight, slightly salty peat, with leather and mustard. The number one problem here is that it works. With water: excellent blended Ben Nevis. Seawater, lemon, leather, tobacco, mustard, eucalyptus sweets, and bergamot sweets. Those bergamot sweets are so good, they’re a speciality of the town of Nancy in Lorraine (where no bergamots grow, of course). Finish: long, tight, very much on salted and smoked zests. A really salty aftertaste (not saline, salty). Comments: these folks are quite annoying, offering such improbable things that work so well. It’s the best side of ‘modern whisky’.
SGP:566 - 87 points. |
Seminal question: what works best, peated BN or unpeated BN blend finished in an Islay cask? Who says I have the answer? In any case, I really like these people’s approach... It’s Singapore, baby! |

|
Ben Nevis 25 yo 1998/2023 (48.7%, Oxhead Whisky Company and Vinehoo, China, hogshead, cask #757) 
We also had this kid left with us... Colour: White wine. Nose: A robust return to soot, basalt, slag, green walnuts, mustard, fino sherry, and potting soil... the most austere style of BN, though not without its charm, in my view. Hints of fresh paint, artichokes, and cactus... Mouth: More fruity but also more mustardy, peppery, with notes of fermentation, bread dough, mache lettuce, asparagus, and green bananas. Finish: Long, tense, green, a tad acidic, and quite belligerent. A touch of bitter orange liqueur at the end of the finish, along with notes of mushrooms and paint. Comments: A BN that challenges your certainties, let’s say. Perhaps the most herbaceous of them all.
SGP:472 - 86 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 26 yo 1996/2023 (48.9%, Royal Mile Whiskies, refill hogshead, cask #1711, 213 bottles) 
This should be delightful, as Royal Mile Whiskies have been selecting some cracking drams lately, including a Springbank we're eager to try. Colour: Pale gold. Nose: precisely that lovely mix of polish, soot, overripe apples, cigarette ash, paraffin, and that little chemical touch we so adore in many a Ben Nevis. Perhaps a blend of lemon syrup and nail varnish? Then there's something like pear-flavoured ale, if such a thing exists. Who would complain? Mouth: pure, precise, yet charmingly dirty, sharp, and peppery, with that signature ‘two-stroke’ character adding depth, much like JJ Burnel's bass in some Stranglers tracks. You get me? As usual, the paraffin, wax, and pepper form the bassline here. Don't ask who's on drums... probably the ashes. Finish: long, with a similar profile—pepper, overripe apples, lemon, ashes, paraffin, and all that jazz. Comments: lovely tension. That said, I hate to write this, but it’s probably not for beginners.
SGP:562 - 90 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 27 yo 1995/2023 (50.6%, The Whisky Blues, sherry butt, cask #506, 376 bottles) 
Always these lovely labels… Colour: gold. Nose: oh, a bit of Meursault with a few drops of mirabelle eau-de-vie and some apricot liqueur. Simply magnificent, no need to linger on it. Not really necessary but with water: add some old apples. Mouth (neat): the leather, soot, and pepper of Ben Nevis join the chardonnay, apricot, apple, and mirabelle for our utmost delight. With water: a change of direction, the apple takes the lead with a surprising, slightly rough Calvados-like edge, and even a very artisanal kirsch side. Finish: rather long, wilder, earthy, peppery, almost a bit spicy. Comments: what an adventure. But it wouldn’t be BN if it were just a lovely but tame(ish) little malt, would it.
SGP:652 - 89 points. |
We shall put an end this delightful madness with two very old Ben Nevis whiskies, by the aptly named Alambic Classique. Be aware, these old vintages are not necessarily the best… |

|
Ben Nevis 50 yo 1966/2017 ‘Sherry Cask’ (40.6%, OB for Alambic Classique, cask #3641, 163 bottles) 
The challenge, if we may call it that, is that the official 1966 releases we have sampled, albeit not numerous, were exceptional, particularly the 1966/2017 for La Maison which was a real stunner (WF 93). So, forget what we previously said about old vintages. Colour: bronze amber. Nose: to paraphrase Talking Heads once again, qu’est-ce que c’est? Is it fig eau de vie distilled by a Turkish tribe with ancestral, undisclosed skills? Pre-war rose liqueur (pre-war, a term that means nothing anymore, agreed), ancient mead? Actually, it is quite close to mead. The old sherry behind it all is superlative, it genuinely seems like a true solera cask that has behaved impeccably. And a few notes of very, very old true gouda. Mouth: it’s strange, but it’s admirable, packed with pipe tobacco, fermented fruits (the fig returns), old wines that seem a bit lost, including aged Bordeaux, then all sorts of leathers and earthy tones. First waters from very old Pu-erh tea (still somewhat tannic) and plenty of cinnamon and liquorice wood. The wood is very forward, but it’s magnificent wood. Finish: longer than expected, fairly bitter and on fir, aubergine and resins, but the return of the old fig spirit at the end more than makes up for all that. Comments: a very old BN ‘in its juice’, simply magnificent. Sometimes, it’s good to be a humble little whisky blogger.
SGP:561 - 93 points. |
A compadre and then we'll be done for good with our Ben Nevis. This time. |

|
Ben Nevis 50 yo 1966/2017 ‘Calvados Cask’ (41%, OB for Alambic Classique, cask #3645, 100 bottles) 
I believe this is a finishing, and it's quite possible its companion was as well. Colour: mahogany. Nose: we're very close to a very old Calvados, but with less of that herbaceous side and consequently, a bit more old malt. Plenty of old apples, cigars, cider, sloe, with a reappearance of fig alcohol, dried lychees, old balsamic vinegar... It's clearly a fusion of old malt and old Calvados, but honestly, it works brilliantly. There's also that earthy side of old Calvados. Mouth: old Calvados, without a doubt. Reminds me of the old Camut from the Auld Alliance. Apples, green pears, a touch of cork that's not bothersome at all (quite the opposite, actually), a return of old Bordeaux (cabernet/pepper), then old Armagnac (I swear), but indeed not much maltiness as a consequence. Exceptionally, we're not going to complain about that. Finish: very old Calvados for a good while. Resinous aftertaste (green and black propolis). Comments: more spectacular than the 'sherry', but also a little more deviant. It's still quite sublime, the rest is only politics and philosophy.
SGP:571 - 92 points. |
Thirty-three BNs
Sot thirty-three Ben Nevis, ranging from 4 to 50 years old, which wasn't too bad, especially considering the average level was extremely high (WF 88.09090909 – ha). Thanks to all the bottlers who offer us these admirable Ben Nevis, even the most unusual one still received a score of 80 points, while our favourite scored 93 points. Ben Nevis is certainly a "Grand Cru" in our small and secret personal ranking. |
|
July 21, 2024 |
|
  |
|
Angus's Corner
From our correspondent and
skilled taster Angus MacRaild in Scotland
Sunday Malternatives
Many Cognacs and Armagnacs |
|
|
I’ve had very little time to be able to dedicate to tasting anything much of late. Two companies and two children are time consuming apparently. Thankfully I’ve managed to record these notes for assorted Armagnacs and Cognacs that were accumulating here at Whiskyfun HQ Scotland. No need to re-iterate my love of French spirits, only that I still believe they are very much spirits about finesse, detail and subtle difference, not the broad brush strokes of whisky or rum. Although, I would continue to urge whisky friends to go and discover French spirits, there’s level of quality and value for money ratio that hasn’t been seen in whisky for… well, a long time. Now, I would say you can ignore most of the more standard and entry level bottlings and aim directly for the more interesting, indy producers and bottlings, such as… |
 |
|
|
 |
Jean-Luc Pasquet 2017/2023 (40%, Berry Bros. & Rudd, The Pioneers, Petite Champagne, cask #72, 421 bottles)
Love Jean-Luc Pasquet, great negotiants and even better growers and distillers - not to mention extremely lovely people. Colour: pale gold. Nose: superbly fresh and youthful cognac full of citrus rinds, flowers and many shades of oranges and fruit marmalades. This is where 40% can sometimes be a bit of an asset when the Cognac is otherwise untarnished by sugar or additives and the vibrancy of the distillate is given space to really shine. Mouth: orange oils, flower blossoms and nectars, kumquat, mango pulp and orange sherbet and cordials. There are even little waxy and textural aspects like marrow and honey roast root vegetable coming through. Stunning spirit and a totally wonderful freshness around every corner. Finish: medium, but very wonderfully honeyed and full of natural fruit-driven sweetness. Still a wee rustic, earthy edge in there too. Comments: quite a statement to do such a bottling in this day and age at 40%, it reeks of confidence. Now, personally I’d probably have gone for 48.5% myself ;) Hard to imagine too many whiskies showing so well at this age and bottling strength.
SGP: 551- 87 points. |
|
|
 |
Château Laubade 17 yo 2006/2023 (54.8%, Watt Whisky, Bas Armagnac, hogshead, 294 bottles)
100% Baco grapes. Colour: amber. Nose: many typical dark fruits, along with a rather pungent varnish character which speaks to proper, mature, slightly funky Armagnac with this rusticity and slightly gluey character which nods at tropically aged rums. I also find plenty treacle, date molasses and a nice mix of chocolate and leaf mulch. Opens up very impressively I would say. With water: very fragrant, with a big development towards dried flowers, face cream, pollens and bouquet garni of herbs. Mouth: quite prickly with a lot of strong peppery notes, grippy tannin, aniseed, wood spices and strong black coffee. Pretty powerful and perhaps a tad heavy on the alcohol. With water: well tamed now! Much more focused on those dark fruits again, with plenty plums, damsons, stem ginger in syrup, figs and some nutty and wood spice notes. Still with some rather robust tannin. Finish: long, very spicy and peppery now, still a little hot and lively, and some aniseed in the aftertaste. Comments: really the powerful and heavy side of Armagnac I would say, but a style that would please many rum and whisky drinkers. Another excellent selection from the Watt Whisky stable.
SGP: 561 - 87 points. |
|
|
 |
Domaine Séailles 20 yo 2000/2021 (54%, Grape Of The Art, cask #19, 195 bottles) 
From 100% Ugni Blanc grapes this time, and from the Ténarèze region of Armagnac. Love the excellent people behind Grape Of The Art, undoubtedly one of a handful of new(ish) indies who are at the forefront of bottling and celebrating French spirits. Naturally, they’re from Germany ;) Colour: mahogany. Nose: superb! We are even further into these wonderful gluey, almost solvent territories, along with crystallised orange peel, spiced marmalade, bitter dark chocolate and lovely impressions of unlit cigars and mint liqueur. Love this nose! With water: deeper, earthier, drier and more of this mulchy and rancio character. A few lovely prunes too. Mouth: you can see why this would appeal to rum drinkers, could almost be an old hot climate Demerara with this big notes of rum, molasses, liquorice, wood spice, menthol and medicinal aspects and concentrated dark fruit syrups. Wonderful focus and concentration overall. With water: once again I find prune, prune eau de vie in this case, more pronounced peppery wood spices, leaf mulch, bitter cocoa and resinous hardwoods. Finish: long and spicy, dry earthy and peppery notes, preserved dark fruits and dried herbs. Comments: another very powerful style, I love the even more focussed rustic and gluey profile in this one, superbly concentrated and extremely ‘Armagnac’ - if you get me.
SGP: 561 - 88 points. |
|
|
 |
Mauxion ‘Lot 89’ (47%, OB, Bois Ordinaires, +/-2023) 
Bois Ordinaires is famously supposed to be a bit… ordinary. But there are many very fine Cognacs from these lands. Colour: orangey gold. Nose: apricot and peach and honey, all very classical, but with a slightly leaner and leafier profile that perhaps lacks the more opulent fruitiness of Fins Bois or Grande Champagne. Mouth: tangerine, change pi tea, bitter orange and some hints of pressed flowers and cedar wood. Feels overall a little hot and gritty at times though. There are some further nice notes that recall fruit gummy sweeties - Cognac by Haribo perhaps. Finish: medium, a little peppery and still with a similar fruit profile into the aftertaste. Comments: all perfectly fine but not too exciting thought.
SGP: 451 - 84 points. |
|
|
 |
Laurichesse 'Le Vaillant Lot 76' (48.1%, Malternative Belgium, Grande Champagne, 2023) 
Colour: deep coppery gold. Nose: gorgeous! Fruit pies, pastries, pollens, nectars, glazed breads, crystallised citrus fruits, unlit cigars and aged dessert wines. Sweetness balanced by drier and richer aspects. It’s also extremely classical and feels very typical of excellent Grande Champagne. Mouth: some slightly funky and exotic wood extracts, then orange bitters, dried tropical fruit mix, more tobaccos and leathery notes. Like a high-powered very old XO by one of the bigger houses, the sort that used to shelter 50+ yo cognacs. There’s even a slight tang of acidity about it which keeps it extremely fresh and lively. Many dark, preserved fruits, flowers, honeys and nectars. Finish: long, warming and full of citrus, liquorice root and hints of fennel and herbal cough syrup. Superb brightness to the end. Comments: love the sheer effortless and decadent vibes from this. Totally classical old Grande Champagne, but also pure, powerful and undimmed by sugary additives.
SGP: 651 - 90 points. |
|
|
 |
Mauxion ‘Lot 45’ (54%, OB, Borderies, 261 bottles, +/-2023) 
Usually ‘Lot 45’ would lead us to believe it was really a 1945 harvest, however it seems this one was harvested and distilled in the late 1970s, so perhaps its suggesting 45 years old in this case? I’m very fond of Borderies, it’s the region which seems to most regularly produce cognacs which suggest similarities to whisky. Colour: deep coppery gold. Nose: indeed, I am immediately thinking of some older highland malts, this is earthier, drier, more tense and showing a more subtle fruitiness that involves bitter marmalades, citrus rinds, sultanas and muesli full of dried fruits and nuts, really a profile and style that converges with other spirits at this age. With water slackens and relaxes a little, with some more classical notes of flower honey, dry earthy notes, tobacco leaf and pine wood. Mouth: excellent richness and power, again this is rather more tense, with bitter herbal notes, well extracted fruit teas, earthier components, pollens and feelings of petrichor and even mineral aspects. With water: orange oils, sultanas, raisins, kumquat, runny honey and some green fruitiness as well. Finish: good length, rather sharp and zingy fruitiness which feels nicely refreshing and even some peppery and waxy notes into the aftertaste. Comments: I really like this profile, but it’s true that these Borderies can be rather tough and demand a bit of wrestling to get to grips with them. But whisky people should definitely seek out and taste this one.
SGP: 561 - 88 points. |
|
|
 |
Vallein Tercinier 'Lot n° 65' (54.4%, OB, 2015) 
These 65s from Vallein already carry a mighty reputation; time to add my two cents into the hat… Colour: bright orangey amber. Nose: wet forest floors, musty wine cellars, top quality dried mushrooms, many tiny spices, tobacco ranging from pipe variety to unlit cigars in a humidor and then tiny notes of dried mint and mint tea. I even start to find a deeper herbal and vegetal quality like Maggi mixed with aged Fernet Branca. I also forgot to mention fruits, all manner of peaches, plums in dessert wine, apricot and dried exotic fruits. With water: hot house flowers, lemon peel, bergamot, medicinal herbs and Mouth: stunning and vivid fruitiness that goes over the top into excessive new territories compared to most cognacs, fruits that are overripe and almost funky. Powerfully on oranges and tangerine puree, mango pulp, flower honeys, kumquat, star fruit and papaya. There’s something tropical that recalls some of the great 1960s single malts (Longmorn, Springbank, Bowmore etc). With water: smooshed dandelions, many more apricots, peaches, stunning notes of yellow plums and a slightly dialled back exoticism now. Also, it is just relentlessly, unyieldingly quaffable! Finish: very long, on plums, herbal liqueurs, wormwood, orange cordial, ancient dessert wines and aniseed. Comments: it’s the sense of effortlessness combined with a feeling that it takes you to territories above and beyond almost all other old cognacs. And it’s not even the best of these 1965s…
SGP: 661 - 92 points. |
|
|
 |
Mauxion 1950 (43%, OB, Grande Champagne, +/-2023) 
Said to be over 70 years in cask. Colour: orangey amber. Nose: concentrated on oranges, citrus fruit peels, marmalades, dried mushrooms and earthen cellar floors. Also these rather typical characteristics of unlit cigars, dried flowers and a little rancio character which I’m frequently finding in old Grande Champagnes of this age. Mouth: very old school a lot of ‘dark’ honey characteristics, honey on dark grained breads, very old sauternes, kumquat and miso. Treads that perfect tightrope of feeling simultaneously very old but also quite bright and still rather lively. There’s even a touch of acidity about the palate which is really vibrant. Finish: long, earthy, increasingly rustic with liquorice, tree bark, herbal bitters and plum wine, then some dark fruits glowing in the aftertaste. Comments: wonderful and charming old cognac that again ticks this decadence box, throws off some very strong ‘sipping with your feet up’ vibes.
SGP: 561 - 90 points. |
|
|
 |
Héritage René Rivière 'Madame Pivoine Lot 25' (48.1%, Malternative Belgium, Borderies, 2023) 
Theoretically this should be a 1925. Colour: deep gold. Nose: once again with Borderies I’m finding a tenser, drier, more herbal and earthy profile that again makes me think of some very old - and old style - malt whiskies. Touches of truffle, wild mushroom, parsley, liquorice, darjeeling tea and dried mint. Also some slightly medicinal herbal notes such as wintergreen and angelica root. Mouth: again this feeling of spirits and styles covering with age. There are parts of this that immediately make me think of old Glen Grant, while others suggest well-aged Demerara rum. What’s for sure is that it’s a more complex and challenging style revolving around roots, herbs, medicinal qualities, dried out fruits, tobacco and old ointments, bitters and liqueurs. Finish: medium in length and perhaps running out of steam in terms of power, but still some lovely notes of old sun lotion, dried out honeys, cider apple and ink. Comments: Malternative Belgium seem to have perfected the art of unearthing these wee nuggets of pure liquid history. Utterly charming and fascinating, if not totally technically brilliant old Cognac. Again, whisky people that would like to be pleasantly surprised by Cognac: try this!
SGP: 461 - 88 points. |
|
|
 |
Borderie Lauzac 1906 (37.3%, OB?, bottled circa 1950)
This was an old bottle I bought at auction quite a few years ago and decided to open recently with some good friends. The ABV was measured with my Anton Parr. Colour: pale amber. Nose: a much more old-fashioned style, and you feel that there has probably been something added with this deep mulchy note and rather strong impression of old Demerara rum (which it was not uncommon to use as an additive for cognac in these days). That being said it’s still extremely alluring with very vivid notes of sticky dark fruits, sultana, raisin, prune and date. Very dark and very rich and unctuous with good rancio character. Mouth: a little sweeter than expected, and still showing remarkably good power given the age and ABV, again feeling the inclusion of some additive components here, but it doesn’t diminish these rather simple but charming old style cognac characteristics. Very dominated by leaf mulch, mushroom notes, many variations of tobacco, humidor, cellar must, funky old pinot noir and even wee hints of hessian. Finish: medium and rather sweetish, going into dessert wine territory while still showing some of these lovely earthy, mulchy and tobacco characteristics. Comments: a very old-fashioned style of cognac I’d say, and markedly different from the other Borderies we tried in this session. The sort of cognac that you could imagine demolishing many centilitres of while tackling a large cigar - which I’m sure some good folks probably did with this very cognac in decades past.
SGP: 471 - 88 points. |
|
|
 |
Château Jousson 'Sélection 1875' (OB, Fine Champagne, magnum, +/-1950)
A magnum bottle that I opened and poured at my wedding last year, much to the delight of several very good French friends who happened to be in attendance. I believe it is the first time I’ve seen a Frenchman at a Scottish wedding attempting the French version of a ‘hauf an hauf’, in this case it was around a half pint of this cognac with half bottle of champagne… Colour: reddish mahogany. Nose: amazing freshness and pure old school richness. These properly ancient pre-phylloxera cognacs seem to possess a depth and rusticity that sets them apart from later eras, and that’s really the case here. Immediately and very precisely on cellar must, old dessert wines with fading acidity, powerful rancio character, many dark fruits, balsamic notes that almost go towards very old sherry and more of these impressions of strong, dark flower honey. Mouth: brilliant arrival, assertively on old mead, dried out old honeys, chestnut mushrooms, bouillon, umami seasonings, bone marrow gravy and bay leaf. A meal in a glass! And also very mulchy and deep tobacco notes. Roasted nuts, cassis, dark fruit cordials. Magnificent! Finish: medium to long, darkly fruity, gamey, rancio, wee hints of chocolate, dried mushroom and even some appley hints that nod towards equally ancient calvados. Comments: glad I opened this one.
SGP: 561 - 92 points. |
|
|
 |
Cognac Grande Fine Champagne 1865 (Eschenauer & Co Bordeaux, circa 1950) 
1865, definitely quite a long time ago, according to the Googlenet! Another bottle I bought at auction quite some years ago and decided to open recently. Colour: deep amber. Nose: sticky and velvety with prunes, molasses, dates, figs in syrup - a definite sense of sweetness or additive. Indeed, you get these further notes of sweet Demerara sugar and old rums. Also a lot of leaf mulch, old tobacco pouches, old pipes and quite a bit of rancio. Fun, but lacks the assertiveness, power and complexity of the Jousson. Mouth: you can immediately feel this is a lovely old Cognac that has been kind of drowned a bit in sugar and additives. Getting towards bitter caramelised brown sugars, sweet liquorice, sugary black tea and curious herbal liqueurs. Not a total disaster, but we’re some way away from the Jousson, once again. Finish: medium, sweet, herbal, on sugary extracted teas once again, plum jam, liquorice and blackcurrant wine. Comments: funny old stuff. Be careful, not all these old pre-phylloxera artefact bottles are amazing. Not a total disaster, but a good example of what happens when someone gets trigger happy with the sugar!
SGP: 531 - 78 points. |
|
|
Let’s return to Armagnac in an effort to end this session on a high… |
|
|
 |
Domaine de Gaube 1929 (46%, Darroze, Bas Armagnac, +/- 1980) 
Darroze was truly ahead of the game in these days and bottled many, many totally stunning old Armagnacs in true indy bottler style, often with higher than usual ABVs and without additives. Colour: bright amber. Nose: another galaxy after that funny 1865. Stunning brightness and beautiful freshness of fruit; figs, mirabelle, damsons, sultanas and quince all over the shop. Damp forest floors, blackberry wine, camphor, herbal bitters, wee touches of pine wood and even wood smoke and medicinal herbs. Amazing freshness and power. I’m also getting this sense of varnish and glue that you can find some older Armagnacs, that makes you think of hot tropical matured rums. Brilliant liveliness and power. Mouth: yes! Armagnac, plain and simple. Pure rusticity, rancio, dark fruits, earthy black teas and many shades of tobacco. Magnificent length and complexity too, drawing your attention down many tertiary side routes and making you notice all sorts of notes. Fennel seen, bruised apple, old boot polish and cedar wood. Is there an anti-Armagnacporn brigade? Presumably they’re having lunch. Finish: long, deeply earthy, wonderfully herbaceous, tight fruitiness that even brings a little acidity and more of these wonderful varnish vibes. Comments: just utterly outstanding old Armagnac. Would you call this ‘old style’? It certainly feels like it has a depth and length that feels a little uncommon among contemporary Armagnacs. That being said, the difference is nowhere near as striking as, for example, Glenlivet 12yo from today vs a bottle from the 1930s. We’re getting side-tracked, what a magnificent bottle!
SGP: 662 - 93 points. |
|
|
|
July 19, 2024 |
|
  |
On the hunt for Ben Nevis, Part Quatro |

|
Typical whisky tourist in front of the distillery (Ben Nevis) |
One wonders if the expression 'to wax lyrical' wasn’t invented during a tasting of old Ben Nevis. Quite proud of this observation (S., it's just embarrassing Ed). |

|
Ben Nevis 23 yo 1999/2022 (53.8%, Limited, bourbon hogshead, cask #905, 276 bottles) 
These new G&M-style bottles are truly lovely. Excuse me? Yes, it's what's inside that counts. Colour: gold. Nose: slightly less ‘present’ vintages, less idiosyncratic, but with a lovely oiliness, nougat, sesame and sunflower oils, apple, gooseberries, light IPA, a tiny hint of vanilla and cedarwood… With water: new pullovers in a pullover shop and waxed paper. Mouth (neat): full-on lemon juice, herb juice, green bell pepper, then grapefruit zest and a touch of fresh concrete. Melon skin and grape stalk. With water: the waxed paper returns, cedarwood, and even raw wool. Finish: long, somewhat austere, a bit yeasty, ending with notes of ouzo and pastis. Comments: not one of the most classic Ben Nevis, but looks like we're already flying at very high altitude.
SGP:562 - 88 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 24 yo 1997/2022 (52%, Abyss Whisky Bar, Hong Kong, hogshead, cask #590, 274 bottles) 
Well, if it’s at the same level as their interstellar 1996, it’s going to be splendid, but is that even possible? Colour: white wine. Nose: lovely notes of fresh bourbon, vanilla, pina colada, coconut, mild herbal teas, sweet woodruff, mullein flowers, pink grapefruit… This is all magnificent, but it’s a much tamer style compared to most other Ben Nevis. With water: small pink bananas, pollen, tiny touches of new cardboard… Mouth (neat): soft and fruity, on mild citrus, tangerine, Sichuan pepper, papaya… Although the pepper gains speed, reinforcing that BN character. With water: sweet mint and anise appear, soft liquorice, curaçao, mango liqueur… Finish: medium length, sweet, peppery, and fruity. Comments: it doesn’t have the admirable tension of their 1996, but it’s still a very greatly excellent (!) whisky, let’s not be too picky.
SGP:651 - 89 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 27 yo 1996/2023 (44.2%, Vintage Bottlers, hogshead, cask #1707, 189 bottles) 
Colour: white wine. Nose: quite perfect. Banana smoothie with fresh mint and linden honey. But really, who could be against that? A few touches of brioche dough and beeswax, but it remains fruity, easy, and irresistible. Mouth: it’s almost syrup, it’s so sweet, with an Irish side, mangoes, pear juice, prickly pears, meadow honey… Only in the far distance do you find some waxy, peppery, and ashy touches reminding you it’s a Ben Nevis. Finish: medium length but delicious, honeyed, with even a bit of fresh sugarcane juice. Comments: a Ben Nevis all about smoothness and drinkability. You could drink it like a wine, for instance with foie gras. Yes, I swear.
SGP:641 - 89 points. |
Here, there is a little brother... We often talk about the vintage for barley, but I remind you that, with the dormancy periods and so on, generally, the distilled barley comes from the previous year. In other words, the vast majority of the 1997 batch should have been distilled from 1996 barley. |

|
Ben Nevis 26 yo 1997/2022 (47.1%, Vintage Bottlers, hogshead, cask #416, 252 bottles) 
Colour: white wine. Nose: there's a lovely tension here with notes of grapefruit, sauvignon blanc, and lime, accompanied by the faintest hint of high ester Jamaican rum. Throw in some fresh ink, paper, and those new jumpers we've mentioned before—remember them? Mouth: sweeter and softer but still maintaining that tension. It's not far off a grapefruit liqueur (grapefruitcello? Pompelmocello?), then comes a bit of paraffin oil, touches of rubber, and pencil lead, making it a classic yet intermediate BN style. Finish: medium length, slightly sweet perhaps, but excellent. Aniseed biscuits linger at the end—those Alsatian anis bredala (or bredele up north, but we're more south at WF Towers). Okay, I’ve noted you didn’t care. Comments: really rather extremely good.
SGP:652 - 89 points. |
We're really entering nit-pickers’ territory with all these superlatives 199Xs... |

|
Ben Nevis 27 yo 1996/2023 (49.4%, The Spirits Hunters, HNWS & Dadi Liquor, hogshead, cask #890, 235 bottles) 
Dadi Liquor? We used to have a stunning guitarist here in France named Marcel Dadi, who was one of the kings of fingerpicking. Check him out! Alas, he passed away in 1996 in the explosion of TWA Flight 800 shortly after its departure from New York. Colour: straw. Nose: initially, vegetal notes from the cask, melon rind, freshly cut grass, liquorice wood, fresh mint leaves, asparagus... then, only exotic fruits, but more on the peel side, with a certain subtlety. Banana skin, mango skin, a few flowers... All very elegant and full of self-control. Mouth: fruitier, more 'Irish', more on plums, quinces, apple and pear skins, then we find some saline touches reminding us it’s indeed Ben Nevis. Finish: quite long, with more wax, and some notes of candied sugar. The aftertaste is more bitter, peppery, more on leaves and peels. Comments: all in all, a very beautiful 1996, but rather more austere, more herbaceous, and less immediate than others. But great drop.
SGP:461 - 87 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 26 yo 1996/2022 (51.9%, Nickolls & Perks, Inaugural Casks, refill hogshead, cask #854, 148 bottles) 
Colour: pale gold. Nose: bananas of all kinds, apples as well, acacia flowers, honeysuckle, dandelions, prairie honey, South-Burgundian chardonnay (better and cheaper), beeswax and pollen... seems like something's cooking here... With water: an earthy side emerges, chalk, wool, stearin, lamp oil... Mouth: bingo, mangos, pink pepper, prime tea tannins, bananas, pomelos (why not?) ... With water: abfab tense citrus, yellow and white fruits. Hits our whisky G-spot. Finish: long, lemony and honeyed. Woodruff. Perfect. Comments: I suddenly realise this tasting note has been somewhat accelerated and that some nuances may have been overlooked. I apologise for that.
SGP:561 - 90 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 26 yo 1996/2022 (53.2%, The Whisky Blues for Whisky Age, refill hogshead, cask #1694, 169 bottles) 
Colour: vin blanc. Nose: fully on the distillate's DNA, that is to say chalk, wool, bread dough, soot, ashes, and sweet mustard. Nothing more, nothing less. With water: more of all that, chalk, wool, porridge, ink... Mouth (neat): much fruitier, with especially goji berries (I swear) and small plums. We're getting closer to those little berries we love so much, holly, rowan, service, sloe... They make the best eaux-de-vie in the world! And let’s not even mention sorb and jujubes (oops, too late). With water: I adore it. Magnificent tension, small white fruits, hints of passion fruit, but no mango. I think we can do without mango from time to time. Finish: quite long, subtle, more saline and peppery. After all, it's Ben Nevis. Comments: our friends in Asia have become, over the years, the kings of selecting 'natural' casks, bravo!
SGP:561 - 91 points. |
One last one before we move on to the older vintages... |

|
Ben Nevis 27 yo 1996/2023 (54.9%, The Whisky Jury, refill hogshead, cask #843, 90 bottles) 
The Rembrandts, Vermeers, and Rubenses of the spirit world. Colour: Full gold. Nose: This one’s bound to unite everyone. Think apricot tarte, mango peel, Meursault (get your wallet ready), clay, Riesling, fresh plastic, Marlboro, crushed slate, oyster mushrooms... With water: white chocolate and Darjeeling. Perhaps a hint of salsify, but that’s an acquired taste, isn’t it. Mouth (neat): Magical. Wonderful tension, apricot eau-de-vie (watch your prussic acid), green apple, Jamaican rum (fancy that?), lemon, bergamot, and citron liqueurs... With water: touches of chlorophyll (Wrigley’s gum) and skins of banana, mango, and even pear. Polish and cigar ash in the background, reminding us it’s unmistakably Ben Nevis. Finish: Good length and slightly camphoraceous with bitters, amaro, Cynar... Comments: What more can I say?
SGP:561 - 91 points. |
Alright, we’ll meet again soon with older vintages of BN, if that suits you… |
|
July 18, 2024 |
|
  |
On the hunt for Ben Nevis, Part Drei |

|
Where are these? (Ben Nevis) |
We still have a lot left to enjoy, a good twenty or so. And of course, we're not complaining. Let's try to focus a bit on the younger ones, even if it means encountering some wine, as is the current fashion... |

|
Ben Nevis 8 yo 2014/2023 (47%, Signatory Vintage for Whic, Spirit of the Forest, Port pipe, cask #235, 811 bottles) 
Colour: straw. This was well-matured Port wood. Nose: one of the most mustardy yet, quite robust with plenty of watercress (garden cress) and sprouted seeds, just a hint of lavender essence (perhaps from the Port), followed by increasingly prominent leather, cracked pepper, and nutmeg. There’s a touch of smoked paprika and a hint of blackcurrant mustard. Overall, it’s far more ‘Ben Nevis’ than ‘Port’. Mouth: now we get to the cooked red fruits, and thus the Port, complemented by mustard and pepper. Then we move towards very dark chocolate, raspberry ganache, or crème de cassis, but the spices remain at the forefront, especially the pepper. Finish: long, with ripe strawberries and black pepper. Comments: a very fine result, I imagine someone watched over this Port pipe like a hawk.
SGP:662 - 86 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 10 yo 2012/2023 (59.3%, OB, for LMDW New Vibrations, American wine cask, cask #2137, 268 bottles) 
It’s amusing to see an American wine cask, given Ben Nevis’s history of installing concrete washbacks inspired by Californian winemakers. Colour: light gold. Could it have been American white wine? Nose: the wood and fruity varnish are very pronounced, but not bothersome, after all, the cask comes from the land of bourbon. Plenty of coconut milk, hints of green tea, and perhaps even touches of pineapple. It’s curious but delightful. With water: more on pancakes covered in redcurrant jelly. Mouth (neat): very powerful, very spicy, and very fruity. Cranberry juice with oak chips, clootie dumplings, very ‘red’ muesli, red beets… it’s fun. With water: the distillate shines through, with pepper, leather, mustard, nutmeg, saffron, soot, and ashes. Finish: similarly long-lasting. The redcurrants return right at the end. Comments: doubly new-world, this little official Ben Nevis. I quite like it, it’s well-made, no complaints, quite the opposite.
SGP:662 - 85 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 7 yo 2015/2023 (57.1%, Milroy’s, Soho Selection, refill bourbon Hogshead, 353 bottles) 
The 12-year-old from Milroy’s was very pleasant last time. Colour: very pale white wine. Nose: a magnificent, very young Ben Nevis, entirely natural and unadulterated. We’re left alone with the distillate (ha), and it’s brimming with wet chalk, soot, peat, mustard, seaweed, lemon, and green apples. Amen. With water: brake dust, Formica, linoleum, and litres of engine oil. Say Veedol. Mouth (neat): my goodness, it’s delicious. Smoked pepper, peat, lemon, green pepper, horseradish, mild chili… perfect texture, oily yet fresh and refined. With water: who had the brilliant idea of pouring mezcal and gentian into the cask while everyone was looking away? Finish: long, with bitter almonds, soot, cinders, pepper, and lemon liqueur. Comments: there’s peat, but it’s much more integrated than in the very ‘punk’ 4-year-old 2019 ‘heavily peated’ we had last time.
SGP:664 - 87 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 9 yo 2014/2023 (59.7%, James Eadie, first fill oloroso butt finish, cask #367508, 656 bottles) 
These guys are wizards; one must be wary. Indeed. Colour: gold. Nose: oh blimey, boot polish! And hand cream, lanolin, preserved lemon, faux leather, marjoram, lemongrass… With water: almond milk with a hint of seawater and metal polish. It’s perfect. Mouth (neat): that sensation of lemon-scented boot polish and caraway, with added walnut wine, then, increasingly, green Chartreuse and fir bud. With water: lemon zest and soot. And that slightly rough edge from the oloroso and its green walnut side. Finish: long, perfect, on similar notes. Orange liqueur in the aftertaste. Comments: I must remember this one for our Bang for your Buck ranking this month.
SGP:562 - 89 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 10 yo 2013/2023 (57.4%, Dràm Mor, 1st fill palo cortado finish, cask #136, 180 bottles) 
They are also rather adept at finishings; in my opinion, they are among the few small companies to have truly elevated the practice. Colour: gold. Nose: here we have fudge, slightly smoked, nougat, Nutella, praline, toasted sesame, and butterscotch… I had forgotten that palo cortado could do this; we’re not dealing with the salty, tarry mustard of a big fino, or indeed a typical Ben Nevis. With water: more wet earth and low-tide beach. Mouth (neat): it combines well, it’s much more vigorous this time, with pencil shavings, green walnuts, green lemon juice (not lime), and indeed mustard. With water: even better. Lemons, soot, fino. Finish: same. Seaweed mustard in the aftertaste. Seaweed mustard is very good. Only the aftertaste is very slightly dusty. Comments: it must be said that BN is the perfect partner for sherries aged under flor.
SGP:662 - 87 points. |
Here’s a little taste of what’s yet to come... |

|
Ben Nevis 27 yo 1996/2023 (48.8%, Abyss Whisky Bar, Hong Kong, hogshead, cask #877, 215 bottles) 
These splendid folks are situated in the Charterhouse Hotel in Hong Kong. As for the 1996 vintage at Ben Nevis, does it even need yet another introduction? Plus, no sherry in sight, it seems… Colour: straw. Nose: one of the hallmarks of these years at Ben Nevis is the tropical fruit, particularly mango, which weaves itself beautifully between leather, anything from the sea, and ashes. And that’s precisely what we have here, just spot on. There are a few hints of small bananas, rose petals (just a couple), viognier, Sauternes… But all of that is distillate-driven. It also reminds me a bit of the later years’ Brora, like the ones we tasted on-site a fortnight ago. Grand Cru whisky. Mouth: oh, how delightful! The subtle ‘dirty’ side of Ben Nevis, which we adore, is very much present, with a touch of watercress, mustard seeds, soot, banana skin, lime zest… Finish: long and intensely vibrant, you’d never guess this BN is nearing thirty years. Charcoal, soot, cigar ashes, wax, then grated zest and those usual tiny mustard notes. A more saline and mineral aftertaste. Comments: the entirety of this parcel of casks is sublime. It’s far more the Olympus than the abyss, if I may say so… (lousy at best, S.)
SGP:652 - 91 points. |
I don't know how we're going to manage with all these other very glorious 'BNs' that are about to appear on these pages in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1... |
|
July 17, 2024 |
|
  |
On the hunt for Ben Nevis, Part Two |
We have already learned, or had confirmed, that Ben Nevis needs neither wine nor peat. Of course, whiskies can still be very good, but they are nonetheless degraded by the flavouring process. At least, in my humble opinion. Let's carry on, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet… |

|
Ben Nevis 10 yo 2012/2023 (57.1%, Milroy’s Soho Selection, first fill French oak oloroso hogshead finish, 278 bottles) 
With such a finishing, it should pack a punch, let's have a look... Colour: gold. Nose: it's as if someone threw fifty Lindt chocolate bars into the cask. Besides that, pepper and coriander seeds lead the dance, along with the usual mild "à l'ancienne" mustard. A bit of damp earth. With water: yeast, sourdough! Magnificent. Mouth (neat): I believe the distillate tames the cask, and we won't complain about that. Very pretty lemons and grapefruit, green pepper, a hint of horseradish, brine and green walnuts. It's a little rough, which we love. With water: not too much water please. Green apples, pepper, ashes, charcoal. Finish: the same, with a bit of curry and, let's say it, some very maritime sherry. Pass the langoustines... Comments: careful with water. This baby doesn't swim very well... Otherwise, it's excellent.
SGP:462 - 87 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 2013/2022 (67%, The Single Malts of Scotland, Kirsch Exclusive, sherry butt, cask #1271, 790 bottles) 
Pretty good feelings here, despite the lethal strength. And a nice outturn from a single butt! Colour: gold. Nose: ashes, charcoal, truffles, struck matches, mocha, bitter chocolate, asparagus water, brake dust, polenta… In a nutshell, there's a sulphuriness, but an awesome one. With water: Brussels sprouts, leeks, exhaust fumes, but also huge and unexpected notes of botrytis. What’s not to like? Mouth (neat): only good things, bitter oranges, turpentine essence, an abundance of pepper, industrial glue… It’s just extremely strong and not drinkable, if you will. With water: it’s quite a task to properly reduce a spirit down from 67% in your glass, I assure you. The trick is to avoid a 'snap'. We might talk about that again. Not sure we can tame it, even if we get a bit towards raisins and dried apricots. No time to dig deeper into this one. Finish: long. Blimey, what a job it takes! Comments: I think this whisky is a bit of a provocation from all involved. If our lawyer wasn’t out golfing once again, we’d draft a letter. But we love its quirks (the whisky’s, not the lawyer’s).
SGP:462 - 85 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 21 yo 2001/2023 (58.2%, Hunter Laing, The First Editions, refill hogshead, cask #HL19833, 195 bottles) 
Colour: gold. Nose: well then, banana wine, ripe white peaches, apricots, all on a base of wood glue, soot, coal dust, and slag. The whole ensemble is just marvellous. Indeed. With water: all sorts of bread, freshly baked in the morning. Mouth (neat): but how good is this! Mint, lemon, white pepper this time, small oysters, sea water, coriander... But how good is this. With water: perfect. And this time, we've managed our reduction like champions (modesty isn’t what it used to be). Finish: long, taut, but also rich and enveloping. And so ‘BN’. Sublime citrus. Comments: this score might seem high, but I assure you it’s justified. Cross my heart and all that. Thoughts to Colin Ross.
SGP:562 - 91 points. |
But by Jove, it was delightful! |

|
Ben Nevis 1998 (48%, Limited, bourbon hogshead, cask #696, 300 bottles, +/-2023) 
We have a good feeling about this one, once again. It must be reminded that the vintages 1995 - 1996 - 1997 - 1998 were quite superlative at Ben Nevis, for reasons unknown to us. Colour: white wine. Nose: very pure, precise, almost monastic. Green apples, ashes, paraffin, pepper, linoleum. Mouth: a bit of a slip-up at first (strange plastics) but the salinity and lemon quickly put us back on track. Petrol, artichoke, hearts of palm, salsify, and increasingly more salinity. Finish: long. Lemon, rubber, artichokes, samphire, bitterness increasing in the aftertaste. Comments: another Ben Nevis that’s a bit mad and, consequently, very difficult to score. Well, let’s take the plunge...
SGP:362 - 86 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 27 yo 1996/2023 (48.8%, The Whisky Jury, refill hogshead, cask #912, 211 bottles) 
Ah, the revered 1996 vintage, shrouded in a mystery that only Mother Nature herself could conjure. The Whisky Jury has previously bottled several BNs from this vintage, so it makes sense they would continue with this one (why, S?) Colour: gold. Nose: ripe mango, clover honey, and aged Sauternes. Simply marvellous. Mouth: an intriguing dance of green and pink peppercorns, with a hint of medicinal camphor, followed by an avalanche of exotic fruits, all kept in check by vibrant lime and that aforementioned pepper. Absolutely magnificent. Finish: long, with notes of rubber, quite typical, and even a hint of glue, but the citrus and mango notes bring it all together harmoniously. Honey ensures a lasting impression in the aftertaste. Comments: scandalously sublime. A sister cask #1813 was slightly less impressive, but this one commands deep respect. Good heavens!
SGP:652 - 91 points. |
Didn't we agree on six per session? |

|
Ben Nevis 26 yo 1996/2023 (54.7%, OB for Alambic Classique, sherry butt and refill hogshead, cask #01, 264 bottles) 
This official bottling is indeed probably a delight, and we can look forward to some official surprises (does that make any sense, S?) … Mind you, Alambic Classique is a German independent bottler, despite the French name. But who cares, this is Europe, right? Colour: light gold. Nose: starting with a whiff of native sulphur, which is neither surprising nor bothersome, followed by freshly cut grass, asparagus, charcoal, celery, and lemons… It certainly has that wild edge we adore. With water: those early morning bakery notes come to the fore. Eternal gratitude to our bakers. Mouth (neat): lemons, coriander, Madras curry, kumquats, earth, Pu-erh tea… It's magical, truly. With water: forget it, it's exceptional. Finish: long, sublime, chalky, lemony, peppery, with absolute verticality. Comments: Ben Nevis is the most oenological of malt whiskies by far. In twenty years, these bottles will be works of art, each with its own NFT (f****g what?). At the pinnacle.
SGP:62 - 92 points. |
Isn’t it starting to heat up? See you. |
A new section, to shake things up a bit. Not sure if we'll keep it for long, we'll see, it might be a silly idea. |

|
|
The Bottle To Buy
Ben Nevis 26 yo 1996/2023 (54.7%, OB for Alambic Classique, sherry butt and refill hogshead, cask #01, 264 bottles) 
SGP:62 - 92 points.
Provided there's any left... |
|
July 16, 2024 |
|
  |
On the hunt for Ben Nevis, Part Un |

|
Official shot. Not sure the weather's always like this. |
There are many of them, and we have a lot at Château Whiskyfun that we have never tasted. It's time to reduce the stock, not without joy, as we love Ben Nevis. I take this opportunity to congratulate and thank the owners, Nikka, for allowing independents to use the name, which only enhances the fame and reputation of this malt that can be quite grandiose. We have avoided, for now, these Secret Highlanders From The West Coast. In any case, we will do this randomly, without any predetermined order, for more fun and surprises. But we will avoid placing a BN at 40% ABV (if there is one) after a sibling bottled at 60% ABV or more. We are not savages... |

|
Ben Nevis 2014/2023 (46%, Signatory Vintage, Un-chillfiltered Collection, casks #277-278) 
Colour: straw. Nose: bingo, just the right amount of porridge, soot, dough and brioche, lemon juice and baker's yeast. It's immaculate while being slightly dirty and fermentative, which is exactly what one expects from BN. Mouth: a mix of apple and cherry juice, black pepper, cigarette ash, then lemon, all with a perfectly balanced texture. Finish: those lovely hints of mustard, leather, and coal that we adore so much come through now. Comments: it starts very well, and despite its young age and modest presentation, we're already in the top 80s.
SGP:552 - 88 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 8 yo 2015/2024 (46%, James Eadie, Small Batch, first fill bourbon hogshead, 1,301 bottles, 2024) 
Colour: light gold. Nose: the first fill bourbon adds more roundness, vanilla, and ripe bananas, which slightly softens the Ben Nevis character, but it remains present, still with porridge, overripe apples, soot and ashes, a mustardy touch, and real pizza dough. Mouth: lovely tension, ashes, a very slight vinegar touch, pepper, a bit of seawater, then more and more lemon. It’s still 100% Ben Nevis and we’re not complaining. Finish: very long, distinctly more peppery, and even more so in the aftertaste, along with a hint of Fanta (no worries). Comments: I’d love to try this little Ben Nevis with oysters, in lieu of Tabasco. Got any oysters handy?
SGP:562 - 88 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 4 yo 2019/2023 ‘Heavily Peated’ (57.1%, Signatory Vintage, refill oloroso sherry butt, 2,988 bottles) 
Really, only four years? I knew our friends in Scotland liked to replace age with new wood and more or less improbable wines, but now with peat? Let’s see… Colour: white wine. Nose: I’m not sure what to think of these peated batches outside of specialised distilleries. Twenty or thirty years ago, it was fun, entertaining, often very good (Longrow, Brora…) but if everyone’s doing it, no distillery will have a unique style anymore, and each will become the malt supermarket. Anyway, it’s nice, but curiously much cleaner than a traditional BN. Beech smoke, coal… Not bad, but we move on. With water: careful, it’s much better with water, bringing out the slightly metallic side of some much older Ben Nevis. Like an old kettle. Mouth: apples and smoke, plus pepper and lemon. Very drying (oversteeped Lapsang Souchong). Do we really need another Caol Ila? With water: once again, better with water. There’s a hint of very young Jamaican rum. More pepper. Finish: fairly long but simple. Soot, ashes, pears in the aftertaste. Comments: it’s a bit circular, the BN character being naturally close to some peated ones. So, it’s somewhat redundant, if you like. But of course, it’s still very good.
SGP:646 - 82 points. |
Since we're in the prime of youth... |

|
Ben Nevis 5 yo 2017/2022 (67.1%, Cut Your Wolf Loose, STR American oak barrique, cask #7877A, 190 bottles) 
At this strength, we’ll be cautious. With an STR cask, we’ll be cautious too. And at 5 years old, we’ll be even more cautious. Ha. Colour: gold. Nose: green walnuts, loads of very green olive oil (we quite like this style too), then touches of green pepper and chocolate, a combination that works much better than one might think. It's all rather green (as you might have guessed). With water: Swiss cheese, it's almost a fondue. A hint of acetic prickle in the background. Now that's unusual. Mouth (neat): sharp lemon and paraffin mingled with pepper. It’s strong but you sense it has potential. A bit of a carbon note. With water: back to a more classic BN, with soot, coal, very ripe fruits, and a hint of tapioca. Finish: very long, on apple and green pepper. A touch of rennet at the end, a bit quirky. Comments: an odd fellow, with a punk side. It has some very good qualities.
SGP:472 - 80 points. |

|
Ben Nevis 10 yo 2013/2023 (58.6%, Truth & Consequences, Sauternes finish, cask #256R, 215 bottles) 
Putting Ben Nevis in Sauternes, to me, is the equivalent of a triple axel in figure skating. If it works, it's superb. If not... well. Anyway, we've already tasted some excellent Australian whiskies selected by this new, philosophically-named company. Colour: light gold. Nose: typical Sauternes. It adds a lovely aromatic layer without transforming the whisky too much, unlike, say, Tokay or PX. But I couldn't explain why. Pastry dough, brioche, ripe banana, mirabelle, papayas, streusel... All's well. On the flip side, the distillate is indeed gentler, much less 'dirty'. With water: boom, yeasts and beers respond. Mouth (neat): you can really taste the Sauternes, but we love Sauternes. Tons of apricots, a very light muscat note, very ripe peaches, and just those touches of soot and black pepper from BN. It’s very good. With water: balance is found, apricots, very ripe pears, a bit of rose jelly, pink pepper and... champagne. Seriously, there's a champagne-like quality. Finish: long, sweet, jammy. Maybe not the best moment, it gets a bit too much. Comments: a rather beautiful success. And above all, not the slightest sulphur note. Just saying.
SGP:641 - 85 points. |
All is well, it’s coming back up. |

|
Ben Nevis 2000/2022 (49.2%, Limited, bourbon hogshead, cask #1002, 311 bottles) 
Can you believe it, no wine! Just whisky! Colour: straw. Nose: feels like home with porridge, chalk, clay, bread dough, soot, baker's yeast, then ripe apples, grapefruit, pils beer, autumn leaves, apple peels, and brake dust… All is well, all is well… Mouth: it’s so good! Pepper, paraffin, modelling clay, more pepper, lemon juice, touches of toasted sesame oil, Japanese green tea powder (matcha-style), soot, cider… And yes, champagne. Ultra-brut, zero dosage. Finish: long, taut, vertical with sea water, carbon, green apple, etc. Nothing to complain about. Comments: back to the high level. I swear we didn't do it on purpose (well, maybe a bit...)
SGP:562 - 89 points. |
Alright, let's stop here. We'll meet again for the next Ben Nevis session. Shall we say tomorrow? Or sooner? See you. |
|
July 15, 2024 |
|
  |
Some of the best French Whiskies to celebrate Bastille Day
A day too late, as Bastille Day was yesterday, the 14th of July, but it was also Malternative Day on WF. Besides, at Château WF, we're not particularly nationalistic or even "patriotic," given that we believe if there's one act in our lives from which we can derive absolutely no personal merit, it's being born somewhere. We have currently more than 130 distilleries making whisky in France. |
|

Within the French National Assembly, in 1789
the marquis de La Fayette aka Lafayette, drafted
the first Déclaration des Droits de l'Homme
(Declaration of the Rights of Man), which was
heavily inspired by the American Declaration.
(Joseph-Désiré Court — Réunion des
musées nationaux.) |

|
Cezallier ‘Zagat Fils du Feu’ (52.1%, Le Faiseur de Malts, France, lot #TT18A, 436 bottles, 2023) 
Here we are in Auvergne with a whisky distilled in a pot still heated over a naked flame, a blend of 4 malted grains: triticale, barley, rye, and spelt. Aged in refill oak casks and presented in a very lovely bottle. Colour: deep gold. Nose: an impressively thick and rich profile, with a pronounced note of rancio, dark nougat, pumpernickel, and banana cake drizzled with caramel, alongside a faint metallic and earthy hint. We then drift towards the aged agricoles Rums from Martinique and slightly old school whiskies marked by an equally old school sherry, reminiscent of Michel Couvreur's old malts. With water: intriguingly, it smells like a still in full swing. Mouth (neat): a rather rich attack, with ample dark chocolate, pepper, malt extracts, and an array of diverse breads, particularly dark ones. Roasted chestnuts and a touch of old oloroso dulce emerge. With water: much fruitier, almost gentle, but the burnt bread crust note lingers in the aftertaste. Leather. Finish: long, with a pleasing bitterness. A very light herbal liqueur note, then more orange liqueur and rancio. Comments: rich and pleasant. It remains to be seen which of the four malts stands out. Perhaps the spelt? I’m not sure, but I recently had spelt bread, and it somewhat reminds me of that.
SGP:561 - 85 points. |

|
Artesia ‘Tourbé’ (46%, OB, Whisky des Hauts de France, France, +/-2023) 
Of course, 'tourbé' means peated. We tasted two Artesia whiskies two years ago and found them quite good. The Hauts de France are in the north of France. Colour: pale white wine. Nose: very lovely lemon sprinkled over chalk and ashes. Adding to this are very expressive notes of Sauvignon blanc, as well as lime, rhubarb, and slightly underripe kiwi. The overall impression is very clean and works perfectly, I assure you. I forgot to mention, the peated barley malt comes from Scotland. Better that than North Korea, I suppose. Mouth: a mix of Caol Ila, mezcal, and gentian if you know what I mean. The body is very slightly thin, but that's absolutely not a problem. Oysters arrive a few minutes later. Finish: rather long, with lemony ashes, oysters, and a bit of white pepper. A light vanilla note comes in a bit later. Comments: it's ultra-clean.
SGP:565 - 86 points. |

|
Wambrechies ‘Madeira’ (44.5%, OB, France, +/-2024)
Here’s another malt from northern France, aged 8 years in Madeira casks. Wambrechies/Claeyssens, who have been making genever for two centuries, were pioneers of whisky in France since the 1990s. I remember they were among the very few names that didn’t come from the big four whisky countries we used to mention on the early internet forums. Happy to see them back in our glass, the north has always been a land of grains! Colour: gold. Nose: so typically Madeira. Walnuts and mustard, plus a bit of leather, nutmeg, cigar tobacco, and a very, very slight vinegar note. Add a touch of damp earth, crushed slate, and orchard leaves, especially peach. Mouth: excellent, unique, with even more walnuts and leather, plus mustard and tobacco. A hint of fruit-flavoured liquorice (oranges) completes the profile and adds a fresh touch. A hint of fennel. Finish: medium length, similar profile, always refreshing. More oranges and grapefruit in the aftertaste. Comments: I love it, it’s perfect. The use of Madeira is done with the precision of a Chaux-de-Fonds watchmaker. Really glad to see them again – I mean Wambrechies.
SGP:661 - 87 points. |

|
Hordeum 2019/2023 ‘Cerealis’ (48%, LMDW, Version Française) 
Distilled in an Armagnac-style column still from Scarlett spring barley and aged in new French oak. No time to figure out which distillery this is from, possibly from the Jura region, but I wouldn’t bet on it. Colour: gold. Nose: fresh bread, fresh sawdust, sponge cake, then a slightly overripe apple. It's very straightforward, very compact, without much sticking out. Mouth: fruitier on the palate, a bit warm, with ripe plums, vanilla, a bit of nutmeg and cinnamon, then apple tarte. A touch of cane sugar. Finish: medium length, burnt wood, apple turnover with honey and maple syrup. Comments: pleasant, flawless, doing its job very well but perhaps not with tons of character, as they say.
SGP:551 - 80 points. |

|
Biersky (59.6%, OB, Distillerie Bertrand, France, beer and malt eau-de-vie, 2023) 
A blend of young malt spirit (40%) and beer spirit (60%) made here in Uberach in Alsace by Bertrand and their wizard Jean Metzger. So, it is not exactly whisky, but it’s not exactly not whisky either (don’t quote me). I’ve tried earlier batches before, Biersky being a favourite in many Alsatian restaurants, but I’m not sure I’ve ever written any notes. Perhaps in an old forgotten notebook? Colour: full gold. Nose: we’re in whisky territory, it’s not the ultra-floral side of some very hoppy beer spirits, but rather bags and bags of mirabelles and apricots. A very nice earthy side, though I can’t say if it comes from the beer. With water: slight saponification after adding Vittel, then sweet apples and perhaps a hint of hops. Hops are an Alsatian specialty; I remember when I first tasted Lagunitas in California long ago, I found out the hops were from... Alsace. Mouth (neat): a distinct pear eau-de-vie character, but also masala and other spices, curries, ras-el-hanout… I really like this. Lots of fruit peels. With water: excellent, even more on pear, vanilla, and a bit of wood. Finish: similar. Comments: I love this Biersky, and it feels like this recent batch is even better than the previous ones. If you're at a restaurant and torn between an eau-de-vie and a whisky, choose a Biersky!
SGP:640 - 85 points. |

|
Armorik ‘Classic’ (46%, OB, France, bourbon, +/-2022) 
Here we are with Warenghem in Brittany, one of the undeniable leaders of French whisky. I’ve tasted the Classic back in 2011, and it was already quite good (WF 82). And I like it when a whisky isn’t given an overly fancy name, even when it’s NAS. Colour: white wine. Nose: fresh, with gooseberries, apples, a discreet touch of vanilla, and some freshly cut grass, with a hint of pastis. Breton pastis, of course. It’s simple, precise, and pleasant. Mouth: nice fruitiness, indeed classic, with apples, plums, peach, fresh barley, white pepper, and tea (wood). Finish: medium length, apple and barley. Comments: I still agree with myself (and that’s no small feat). A very good young malt, not extravagant at all.
SGP:441 - 82 points. |
Without a doubt, the contrary... |

|
Warenghem 9 yo 2014/2024 (59.6%, Swell de Spirits, Wild Nature series, France, 1st fill oloroso butt, cask #3531) 
Yep, Warenghem = Armorik. Another superb label from Swell d.S. Colour: full gold. Nose: a tad warm but the pecan nut pie, slightly sweet and salty, and peanut butter notes seem quite perfect. Water is needed to explore further. With water: dill, fennel, mint, dried seaweed, walnut wine, cigars… Mouth (neat): it seems top-notch, sharp, lemony, very lively while being robust, very much on bitter and roasted nuts… With water: a festival! Salt, lemon, nuts, pecans, a touch of brine, very dry raisins, pipe tobacco, bitter oranges, artichoke liqueur, and so on. Finish: long and even more bitter. Wonderfully bitter and peppery. It should be tried as an addition to beer (Breton beer, of course). Comments: a lovely beast, somewhat the opposite of the very gentle ‘classic’, as expected.
SGP:472 - 88 points. |

|
Armorik 13 yo 2009/2023 (60.6%, The Auld Alliance, France/Singapore, cask #8241) 
I like this motto on the label, "Ne Jamais Dire Jamais." Never say never, feels a bit like a James Bond movie. Like, shipping some French whisky to a famous bar in Singapore. Colour: full gold. Nose: a few hints of cherry brandy, then some damp earth, but it's a bit strong to nose without restraint. With water: earthy notes, tobaccos, linseed oil, paraffin, toasted sesame oil, old leather (Connolly, of course) … Mouth (neat): ah, excellent! Lovely earthy and spicy character, nuts in all their forms, cherries, more cherries, drops of seawater, quince… With water: hazelnut cake, walnuts, almonds, pecans, macadamias, pine nuts… And a hint of fir wood indeed. Very light sulphur, suggesting a wine cask. Finish: long, more on leaves, stems, fruit skins, and the everlasting nuts. Comments: extremely different, but more or less on the same level as the "Swell."
SGP:461 - 88 points. |

|
St Palais ‘Pointe Blanche’ (43%, Le Cercle, single malt, France, +/-2023) 
Distilled in Cognac stills in the Cognac region, and finished in ex-peater casks - in-cask blending as we say - which is not quite my preferred method but there, I suppose only the results count. Colour: white wine. Nose: it seems to work, it's very light, there are a few whiffs of cigarette smoke (remember cigarette smoke?) and pear. This peaty pear side can also be found in very young Caol Ila, for instance. Other than that, it seems quite harmless… Mouth: more presence, a bit of ginger liqueur, elderflower liqueur too, citron, muesli, white pepper, a bit of peppery apple juice… Frankly, it's pleasant and goes down easily. Finish: almost refreshing, slightly salty, with hints of buckwheat and even a touch of pineapple. Comments: perhaps the gentlest peated whisky in the world. As Nick & Nick wrote on your WF a long time ago, (What's So Funny 'Bout) Peace, Love and Understanding?
SGP:543 - 83 points. |
Wait, there is also a boosted version... |

|
St Palais ‘Pointe Blanche - OLO’ (50.2%, Le Cercle, single malt, France, oloroso finish, 2,400 bottles, +/-2023) 
As long as it’s oloroso, we’re fine. Just saying. Colour: gold. Nose: leather, tobacco, green walnuts, equally green apples, being inside a flower and vegetable greenhouse, fresh almonds, asparagus and turnips… this very vegetal side suits me perfectly. Also, notes of honey and fresh gingerbread. With a bit of water: kougelhopf and fresh panettone. We're getting there, full speed ahead… Mouth (neat): very good. Many distilleries nowadays produce similar whiskies, from Japan to Argentina via South Africa and Italy, but that takes nothing away from their respective merits. With water: very good. Honey, candy sugar, cakes, icing, nuts, vanilla, apple jelly… Finish: medium length, sweet, pleasant, flawless. More nuts and oak in the aftertaste. Comments: reminds me of some of the new Irish whiskies. Excellent, perhaps just not extremely memorable.
SGP:541 - 84 points. |
I deeply regret not having the time to delve into the subject of French whiskies, let alone visit the distilleries. Some lie less than 50 kilometres from WF Towers, and yet I cannot really go to see them. There are just so many… Right, back to Brittany we go… |

|
Eddu 2017/2023 (54%, OB, for LMDW New Vibrations, cognac cask, cask #W08109, 300 bottles) 
Pure 'blé noir'/buckwheat whisky. The use of a cognac cask might seem a tad disappointing, but it’s a multi-fill cask, so probably quite insignificant. As for the seminal question, "is buckwheat a cereal?" let's just say we don't really care. Colour: white wine. Nose: violets, pineapples, Szechuan pepper, hibiscus and jasmine, then the ultimate IPA, bursting with ultra-aromatic hops. With water: even more beer-like. Mouth (neat): I love it, it’s got everything except ‘whisky’. Calvados, pear liqueur, aquavit, rosewater, mandarin liqueur, Mei Kwei Lu... is sorghum close to buckwheat? An eternal novice's question. With water: pear and rose take the lead. It's like a cocktail sipped on the Bosphorus, watching the boats sail by. Finish: mandarin liqueur, pink pepper, roses, flower liqueurs. Comments: a somewhat mad whisky, terribly smooth but never cloying, quite the opposite. Some parts reminded us of Biersky! Quite crazy, love this one too.
SGP:830 - 85 points. |
No need to leave Brittany, especially since we still have Kornog. We loved Kornog, but they disappeared from our radar. I hope all is well over there, and that they continue to distil according to the founder's principles. Good luck, Kornog! |

|
Kornog 2016/2023 (52.7%, Swell de Spirits, Wonders of the World series, 90 bottles) 
A double maturation, apparently, but I'm sure that's not a problem. Colour: white wine. Nose: the impressive smoky purity of Kornog, between new plastic, lime zest, and seawater. Voilà. With water: sublime, one of the greatest European malts along with Millstone and Smögen. No, the United Kingdom has left Europe, didn’t you know? Mouth (neat): insanely elegant. Rosemary, thyme, lemon, menthol cigarettes, oysters, crab… With water: very impressive. It’s Venus emerging from the sea, in whisky form. Imagine, only 6 or 7 years old. Finish: a little warm and disordered, almost rustic, but that adds another dimension. I'm sure it’s the fault of that double maturation. Comments: absolutely sublime, even if it lost 1 point on the finish. I agree, there are more important things in the world right now.
SGP:566 - 91 points.
Update: this from a bottle that's been breathing for a few months. |

|
Kornog 8 yo 2015/2023 ‘Quelque Part Dans le Ciel’ (57.9%, La Maison du Whisky, Ex Libris, France, 1st fill bourbon, cask #21008) 
Somewhere in the skies indeed. Just hope it is not a testament. One of the most elegant series of whiskies ever bottled, in my humble opinion. Okay, okay, maybe it's just a tad elitist, dear La Maison. Colour: white wine. Nose: wheat, hay, white tea, green tea, and a curious hint of game and truffle. Poularde, chardonnay, mushrooms, rubber… With water: ink and wax emerge. Modelling clay. Mouth (neat): my goodness! It’s less assertive than the 2016, but perhaps more elegantly lively, shall we say. Elastic bands, salt, zest, and turpentine. Olive oil, basil, lemon. With water: and more olive oil! Olive oil will save the world (together with lemon). Finish: long but well-mannered, rather on almond milk and barley syrup. A few winkles in the aftertaste, after all, we are in Brittany. Comments: that’s the crazy thing about great whiskies, it’s as if someone sent you a letter in 2015, and you’re reading it in 2024. That said, with the very relative performances of the ultra-unionised La Poste, we wouldn’t even be surprised. No, of course, we love them, we send them thousands of kisses and hugs.
SGP:555 - 90 points. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best spirits Serge tried those weeks, 90+ points only
Ben Nevis 50 yo 1966/2017 ‘Calvados Cask’ (41%, OB for Alambic Classique, cask #3645, 100 bottles)
Ben Nevis 50 yo 1966/2017 ‘Sherry Cask’ (40.6%, OB for Alambic Classique, cask #3641, 163 bottles)
Ben Nevis 26 yo 1996/2023 (48.9%, Royal Mile Whiskies, refill hogshead, cask #1711, 213 bottles)
Ben Nevis 26 yo 1996/2023 (54.7%, OB for Alambic Classique, sherry butt and refill hogshead, cask #01, 264 bottles)
Ben Nevis 27 yo 1996/2023 (48.8%, Abyss Whisky Bar, Hong Kong, hogshead, cask #877, 215 bottles)
Ben Nevis 26 yo 1996/2022 (51.9%, Nickolls & Perks, Inaugural Casks, refill hogshead, cask #854, 148 bottles)
Ben Nevis 27 yo 1996/2023 (48.8%, The Whisky Jury, refill hogshead, cask #912, 211 bottles)
Ben Nevis 27 yo 1996/2023 (54.9%, The Whisky Jury, refill hogshead, cask #843, 90 bottles)
Ben Nevis 26 yo 1996/2022 (53.2%, The Whisky Blues for Whisky Age, refill hogshead, cask #1694, 169 bottles)
Ben Nevis 21 yo 2001/2023 (58.2%, Hunter Laing, The First Editions, refill hogshead, cask #HL19833, 195 bottles)
Kornog 8 yo 2015/2023 ‘Quelque Part Dans le Ciel’ (57.9%, La Maison du Whisky, Ex Libris, France, 1st fill bourbon, cask #21008)
Kornog 2016/2023 (52.7%, Swell de Spirits, Wonders of the World series, 90 bottles)
Sideburn 31 yo 1992+1993/2024 (51.3%, Whisky Sponge, 404 bottles)
Usher’s Old Vatted Glenlivet (J.&G. Stewart ltd., Ditta Modena Import, Italy, +/-1955)
Hakushu 18 yo ‘Suntory 100th Anniversary’ (48%, OB, Japan, 2023)
Yamazaki 18 yo ’Suntory 100th Anniversary’ (48%, OB, Japan, Mizunara, 2023)
Hampden ‘Madeira 2023’ (63.4%, The Colours of Rum, Jamaica, cask #38, 1500-1600 gr/HLPA, 88 bottles, 2024)
Hampden 1 yo ‘DOK’ (52%, OB, La Maison & Velier, The 8 Marks Collection, Jamaica, ex-bourbon, 20cl, 2024)


|
|
|
|