|
|
Hi, you're in the Archives, July 2024 - Part 2 |
|
|
|
July 31, 2024 |
|
|
Staying with the Japanese team, Day 2 (Olympics Day 5)
We began the last session with Nikka, so let’s move on to Suntory. We hope that NAS will increasingly become a thing of the past, but of course, there are still many we haven't yet tasted. Even though we don't quite like seeing ‘founding’ years - or other age/vintage look-alike numbers - prominently displayed on the labels or neck labels. But tey will go. |
|
|
Hakushu ‘Spanish Oak’ (48%, OB, 2021 Edition)
We are well acquainted with the ‘Sherry Cask’, a fine dram indeed (WF 89 in cruise control mode), but the ‘Spanish Oak’ remains a mystery. Presumably, it wasn't previously genuine ‘sherry’… Colour: cognac. Nose: oh là là là là, it’s like Jamaican rum! Nuts, petrol, tar, lapsang souchong, black olives, then wild strawberry liqueur and wood glue. Magnificent and very spectacular. Mouth (neat): what a lark, we’ve wandered into Demerara territory, with more crushed strawberries, rock candy, Turkmen tar liqueur (unsure of the country), toffee, salted liquorice… Now the base structure is curiously light, even fragile. In short, we move from Demerara to the Dominican Republic (wonderful people, usually pretty poor rums). Finish: quite curiously, we remain in rum territory. It’s very surprising. Tar, salt, brown sugar, smoke… Comments: it’s a truly peculiar Hakushu, with an almost collaborative vibe, akin to something from Warhol’s Factory circa 1970. Finally, you see, it’s not really ‘whisky’ in your glass, but some aspects are sublime.
SGP:653 - 84 points. |
Let’s further check that. |
|
Hakushu 18 yo ‘Suntory 100th Anniversary’ (48%, OB, Japan, 2023)
Of course, it’s ‘peated’. Honestly, this should be quite good… Colour: gold. Nose: it’s old Laphroaig. One cannot help but think of the old 30-year-old, which is fitting since Suntory now owns Laphroaig. Sublime camphor, bandages, embrocations, menthol and eucalyptus inhalations (some whiskies do this even better than eucalyptus oil, seriously) … In short, all those medicinal things we adore in old Laphroaig that aren’t just about the peat. Even noble apple juice and very ripe mango. Mouth: ah yes, it’s a bit more oaky than the nose suggested, alas, but it remains quite magnificent, coastal and medicinal, with peat mingled with green spices, green pepper, cider apple… Perhaps the best mouthwash ever produced by mankind. Finish: rather long, heading towards green curry, salted seaweed (wakame), orange chutney, then our friends the slightly plump oysters… Comments: there’s almost always a bit of boosted woodiness in Japanese malts, and that’s the case here, but it’s still a fabulous bottle. Happy 100th, Suntory (I’m sorry we’re late).
SGP:564 - 90 points. |
That puts Hakushu in the lead in our Olympic rankings. |
|
Yamazaki 18 yo ’Suntory 100th Anniversary’ (48%, OB, Japan, Mizunara, 2023)
Have we not already ravaged all the Mongolian oak forests (mizunara) at this rate? Twenty years ago, almost no one had heard of the famous 'quercus mongolica crispula'. Moreover, it seems that the truly Mongolian forests no longer exist, but that’s not whisky’s fault. Phew. Colour: full gold. Nose: attention, Yamazaki is a grand malt. Here we delve into the complex, the subtle, the floral. Honeysuckle, acacia flower, beeswax, mandarin peel, orange blossom water, green orange essence... This is all so wonderful; one might almost dab a few drops behind the ears. What a nose! Mouth: but of course. The mizunara and its pine buds are quickly forgotten, shifting focus to quince, wild rose, medlar, hay wine, white clover honey, and simply bruised apples. Magnificent and truly 'Japanese'. Finish: not eternal but both soft and firm, on frozen fruits. Icewine, baby? Comments: I think we are at the pinnacle of Japan today, unless some Shizuoka or Chichibu comes along to challenge this. We shall see very soon…
SGP:551 - 91 points. |
Yamazaki now in the lead… |
|
Yamazaki ‘Mizunara Tsukuriwake Selection’ (48%, OB, Japan, 2022 Edition)
The price commanded by these bottles, without any age indication (2K€), is simply incomprehensible to many. Who would buy a... well, a Maserati without knowing if it has a straight-4 or a V8 under the bonnet? That analogy’s a bit murky, I grant you. Well, one would still love to know who Mr. Tsukuriwake is, wouldn’t you? Colour: gold. Nose: of course, it’s very lovely, both taut and gentle, with freshly sawn wood and candle wax, bruised apple, quince tart rather than apple, a hint of vetiver in the background, even some shampoo notes... We're quite far from the 18-100th. Mouth: but yes, it’s very good, somewhat akin to some Dufftown malts (GF, B.) but with much more pronounced woodiness. Pine nuts, pine needles, and even a slight sawdust note. Finish: rather long but really on over brewed tea, wood, with a noticeable tannic quality. Notes of strawberry in the aftertaste. Comments: it started off magnificently, but the wood took over and somehow unbalanced the whole. Well, in my humble opinion.
SGP:451 - 83 points. |
|
Chichibu 2017/2023 (65%, OB for ePower, 1st fill bourbon barrel, cask #8279, 176 bottles)
Love the name ‘ePower’, sounds like a new range by BMW. No offence meant (to ePower). Right, let’s tighten our belts, say our prayers, and think of the republic... Deep breath... here we go! Colour: pale gold. Nose: new rubber boots, fresh seaweed, all kinds of fresh bread from various countries, kerosene... And not much else. But at 65% ABV, one is a bit wary. With water: brand new Barbour (TM) jacket. I’m sure they’ve got the equivalent in Japan. Mouth (neat): it seems just totally perfect; it just clings a bit to the tongue and palate. A lot of lemon, it seems. With water: not much. A diamond is also not much (would you cut that, S. – your wife). Maybe some salted apples? And lime. Finish: long, salty, taut, precise, simple. Comments: another great Chichibu, perhaps a bit simpler albeit more ‘efficient’ than others. After all, it’s only five or six years old.
SGP:462 - 89 points. |
Hey, wait a minute, let's have a little Anglo-German expression before we call this a tasting session... |
|
Bimber ‘Germany Edition 2023’ (59.2%, OB, Kirsch Import, PX sherry, cask #456, 280 bottles)
What's with these eagles on the label? Bimber, you might want to not mention the... Colour: deep gold. Nose: we knew this was going to be delightful, with the PX nicely tamed, delivering notes of ripe papaya, banana, wild strawberry liqueur, and raisins macerated in rum. We bow to this one. With water: polish! And asparagus, ski wax, and fresh motor oil... Mouth (neat): a magnificent Bimber, showcasing orange zest, chen-pi, and pink peppercorns... With water: the finest PX we’ve ever encountered. In other words, this wretched PX is totally under control. Smoked raisins and various waxes, you get the idea. Finish: quite long, leaning towards smoked raisins with a hint of botrytis, reminiscent of old Chaume. Comments: not the most straightforward whisky, but that adds to the dialogue and confrontation (eh?). It’s better at cask strength, but then again, cask strength is nearly 60% ABV. C’est la vie.
SGP:562 - 87 points. |
We’ll be back with the Japanese starting tomorrow. Come back if you want but brace yourselves – and contact your insurance company. |
|
July 30, 2024 |
|
|
The Olympic Sessions, 4, staying with the Japanese squad
We thought we'd enjoy a nice and proper Japanese session, with a bit of everything, from great classics to new or recent distilleries.
There is also a perfume called "Mizunara" by Parfum Satori. However, it does not seem to contain any mizunara oak essence, but rather albanum, rosemary, clary sage, lavender, cognac oil, juniper, cypress, patchouli, blue chamomile, labdanum, tulu balsam, and sandalwood. $175 for 50ml – that's more expensive than Yamazaki! (Fragrantica).
|
|
|
Yoichi 10 yo (45%, OB, Japan, Edition 2022)
Yes, any excuse to revisit the recent Yoichi 10, which has been widely applauded for reintroducing a genuine age statement after a seven-year drought, is welcome. We tasted a 2023 bottling, but there was one in 2022 as well! Let's now try the 2022 version, which I doubt is much different anyway, but for the sake of comparison, we’ll consider both. Colour: pale gold (same). Nose: remarkably similar, if not identical. Fantastic bread dough notes, with hints of banana, a touch of chalk, drops of almond syrup (orgeat), a bit of eucalyptus, then a hint of porridge with a dash of... calvados within. Remember, Nikka also produces delightful calvados-like apple brandy. I find the 2022 a tad fruitier and slightly less mentholated, yet they’re as similar as the Kessler sisters (nothing to do with the American whiskey brand, I would suppose). Mouth: same whisky, to be honest. A little sawdust, green tea, banana skin, apple peel, grapefruit, chalk again... Then some earthiness, roots, perhaps gentian, and that faint dirtiness (coal) that I had previously noted and which we enjoy. Finish: medium length, apples, mint, green tea, citrus, with a hint of sawdust in the aftertaste. Comments: well, I do wonder if these were different batches. In a double-blind test without a $50K electronic sniffer, I would say one could not really tell them apart. Very, very fine whisky in any case.
SGP:551 - 88 points. |
|
The Blend of Nikka ‘Maltbase Selection’ (45%, OB, Japan, +/- 2005)
This baby was ‘blended with a matured malt base’. I'm not quite sure what that means, perhaps there was indeed some aged malt in this rather old blend, or maybe it's a pure malt or blended malt – which is likely the case. Note that there are versions not called 'Selection', perhaps more common ones. Colour: gold. Nose: it's incredible – maybe not – how close we are to the Yoichi 10-year-old, except this one is more aromatic, leaning towards all sorts of honeys and flowers, mango and papaya, one or two small fresh mint leaves, a hint of fresh carrot, a tiny bit of coconut, and Earl Grey tea... It’s a magnificent nose. Mouth: once again, we are very close to the Yoichi, with a slightly less precise and perhaps a touch spicier profile, as if it were five years older. In theory, there should be some Miyagikyo in there, but in practice, it’s not detectable. At least, I can't sense it. Still, there's a bit of coconut, fresh wood, and tea... Finish: of medium length, more on that tea. Eucalyptus appears in the aftertaste. Comments: a bit like the sidekick to Yoichi, which is firmer and more intense. Still very good.
SGP:551 - 86 points. |
|
Kaiyo ‘Mizunara Oak Cask Strength’ (53%, OB, Japan, +/- 2024)
Said to be 9 years old and matured in Japanese virgin mizunara. Earlier Kaiyos were sourced and perhaps not properly ‘Japanese’, or perhaps they were, but things may have changed. In any case, the mizunara here was Japanese. I must remind you that 100% Japanese origin does not guarantee quality, as we have tasted myriads of pseudo-Japanese whiskies, even from the large makers, that were rather excellent. Well, enough PCness... Colour: gold. Nose: very simple, very pure, very good. The oak is a bit mentholated and slightly hinting at maritime pine, holding its ground for now, with a pleasant touch of buds and seaweed. With water: the wood essences generate a remarkable ‘viscosity’! The nose remains very pleasant, still marked by mizunara oak, while hints of lemon and green apple peep through. Mouth (neat): the cask is very present, giving a sense of sucking on a cigar dipped in triple sec, then in pine bud liqueur. The worst part is, it’s not unpleasant. At all. With water: more sweetness, perhaps genepy liqueur. Finish: not very long but balanced, with a touch of mint green tea and pine nuts. Comments: I like it, it’s different, it stays balanced despite the near-absolute dominance of mizunara. I think it has progressed well since the Kaiyo mizunara at 43% from five or six years ago.
SGP:471 - 83 points. |
|
Kaiyo 10 yo ‘The Rye’ (46%, OB, Japan, +/- 2024)
Another story of maturation, as this ‘whisky’ was aged in new mizunara, then in ex-rye from Knob Creek - hence its rye designation - and even spent three months at sea for a ‘dynamic maturation’. Truly a whisky of maturation rather than distillation. Colour: gold. Nose: one shouldn’t expect a rye explosion, but there are nonetheless ginger cookies, smoked paprika, rye bread, hints of cedarwood (cigar box), parsley, and dried wild (bear) garlic... Mouth: very good! Clearly more American than Japanese, evoking the Pacific Northwest USA or even British Columbia. It’s amusing! Lovely fruity spices, pink peppercorns, notes of celeriac, a touch of fresh turmeric, then those mizunara notes, pine buds, resins, and mint, chartreuse... It's really very pleasant, the wood is quite pronounced but, in this case, it’s an asset. Nice balance. Finish: medium length, spicy sweetness, ginger, watercress, mild mustard... Comments: great maturation and construction work, quite ‘whisky 4.0’. As long as they don’t cancel Brora, I’m fine with that...
SGP:461 - 85 points. |
|
Akashi 4 yo ‘Calvados Cask Finish’ (62%, OB, Japan, Y’s Cask Tokyo, +/- 2023)
Malt from Eigashima distillery, aka White Oak. These malts are properly Japanese, while many blends they do under the same names are not. So, we’re truly in Japan now (despite the calvados part, haha). Colour: pale gold. Nose: indeed, it does smell a bit like apple, but at 62% vol., all spirits smell like apple, don’t they? Anyway, it seems nice, with wafts of camphor, but let's not push our luck… With water: fresh apple, fresh apple, and fresh apple. And perhaps fresh apple. A few touches of paraffin. Mouth (neat): what a mixture! Full-on calvados and apples, skins, stems, seeds, and flesh, it’s all there. But water can change things... With water: superb texture and finally, this beverage takes on another dimension, with menthol, a rooty note, maybe turnip, a suety aspect, then back to apple and pear compote. Let’s say 2/3 apple - 1/3 pear. Finish: medium length, well balanced, and with a touch of greengages. I adore greengages but they’ve become hard to find, except in our whiskies. Long live whiskies! Comments: there's undoubtedly an experimental side to this blend. Personally, I like it a lot.
SGP:551 - 85 points. |
We'll finish with a Kanosuke, and we'll come back tomorrow, okay? |
|
Kanosuke 2019/2023 (61%, OB, for ePower, Japan, oloroso sherry, cask #19421, 281 bottles)
We love Kanosuke, they've swiftly established themselves among the top tier of genuine Japanese whiskies, but let's not forget that behind them lies the might of Diageo. So, it's kind of ‘craft by big’ – but there's certainly nothing wrong with that. Colour: full gold. Nose: yes, of course, it's walnut stain and oil paint. As they say, it's oloroso from Oloroso & Oloroso’s. With water: sulphur, carbon dust, an old fisherman's net left abandoned on the beach (the net, not the fisherman) and an old box of Cuban cigars. Mouth (neat): massive, rich, liqueur-like and ultra-dry at the same time (yes, that's possible). Pine needles, walnut wine, very old dry sherry, masala, mustard sauce... With water: very tight, very sharp, very dry, bitter, austere, demanding... And we love it. An old artichoke and bitter orange cordial, like our ancestors used to pour into their beers. Finish: long, with notes of beef broth, pepper, dried meats, then everything else we've already discovered. Comments: I think it’s not impossible that only 10% of whisky enthusiasts will love this extreme style, but we are definitely part of that 10%, with joy and determination.
SGP:272 - 88 points. |
|
July 29, 2024 |
|
|
Another Olympic Session (3)
Starting from France, as usual…
A typical cognac still aka alambic Charentais. More and more whisky is being made in Charentais stills these days (photo Sémhur, Cherves de Cognac) |
|
|
Khêmeia (43%, OB, Distillerie d’Aumagne, France, 2023)
Sounds a bit like 'Kamala', no? In recent years, there's been a trend among cognac producers - and anyone with alembics in France - like Louis Royer here, to dabble in whisky production using their Charentais stills. This often results in lighter, less textured whiskies compared to their Scottish counterparts, but generally of good quality despite their youth. Whether they can break out beyond the local market remains to be seen. This wee Khêmeia exemplifies this trend. Colour: gold. Nose: technically near-perfect in a modern style, bourbon-influenced without overdoing it. Ripe banana, vanilla, sponge cake, a hint of fresh sawdust, and tropical fruits like papaya mingle with drops of orange, peach, and melon liqueur. The young age isn't too obvious at this point. Mouth: a bit of ginger and white pepper at first, but the distillate brings notes of toasted malt, a slight salinity, and again, peach and melon. There's a hint of bitter almonds as well. Finish: decent length, more herbaceous, with a light chalky quality, some lemon, and those saline touches reappearing to lift everything. Comments: I quite like this little Khêmeia. The name, meaning 'alchemy' in Greek, suits it well.
SGP:551 - 83 points. |
|
Amaethon (45%, OB, France, +/-2023)
Might sound Greek, but it's Gaulish, apparently. Astérix’s whisky? Distilled from French barley, much like many a Scot, though the distillery of origin remains a mystery to me. Colour: white wine. Nose: very charming, this really does come across as a quality malt distilled by serious craftsmen. Fresh apple, lemon, and mirabelles, then a touch of porridge, bread dough, and croissants (though that doesn’t prove it's French, does it?). A bit of modelling clay and candle wax too. Mouth: very good on the palate, more tense than its Charentais counterpart, with lemon and white pepper again, followed by apples and pears. There's a delightful coastal and smoky edge. Some fresh wood appears later, indicating its youth. Finish: good length, with lemon, a hint of brine, and a touch of bitterness. Comments: it's difficult to achieve more complexity at such a young age. Much like Khêmeia, they haven't taken many stylistic risks, but you can't fault them for that. Reminds me of some not-so-Japanese Japanese whiskies.
SGP:551 - 83 points. |
|
Kalwijck 2019/2023 ‘Higgledy Piggledy’ (46%, OB, Netherlands, oloroso, 525 bottles, +/-2023)
Has me curious about the proper pronunciation of 'Kalwijck,' so any accurate info would be appreciated. This is a grain whisky, Maize I suppose, but they also produce liqueurs and, naturally, genever. Colour: straw. Nose: the oloroso influence is subtle, but there are delightful wafts of root vegetables, turnip, beetroot, along with white asparagus, coriander seeds, charcoal, and fig leaves. It's far more unusual and specific than the French offerings, and thankfully lacks the dullness that grain whiskies can sometimes exhibit. Mouth: it may not be very deep, but the profile is charming, with that charcoal and those root notes, particularly celery, followed by rye and a tobacco smoke element. There are hints of bitter almonds, a touch of tar, earthiness, and a notably oily texture for a grain whisky. Could the oloroso cask have been previously boosted with peated malt whisky? Finish: it loses a few points here due to an uncontrolled herbaceous bitterness, but nevermind. Some ashes. Comments: I believe this has great potential. It's certainly very 'different.'
SGP:462 - 81 points. |
Since we mentioned rye... |
|
Goldwaescher 5 yo 2018/2023 ‘Malted Rye’ (52.5%, OB, Switzerland, Swiss oak, cask #41)
We’re in Willisau here, mind you. Several distillers have already told me that working with malted rye was ‘insane’, but there you go, this could not frighten a proper Swiss distiller. BTW we’ve tried sister cask #44 in January, it was pretty superb (WF 87). Colour: deep gold. Nose: it deviates wildly, and we love that. Banana and curry cake, with honey and geranium syrup. Then an abundance of pumpernickel. With water: even more curry, saffron, also touches of pink grapefruit… Mouth (neat): it’s not really whisky, it’s more like a blend of wood-aged eaux de vie. The problem is, we love it. Eau-de-vie of beer, celery, gentian, Jerusalem artichokes… All this is bizarre, I grant you, but it’s really very good. With water: all the same, with very lemony hops at the helm. Finish: long, with the earthy side and the lemon coming out even more. A sweet and spicy aftertaste. Comments: nice job. Goldwaescher means gold panner, it looks like they’ve struck a vein in Willisau.
SGP:661 - 86 points. |
While we're at it with the strange, back to Holland... |
|
Millstone 2019/2024 (57.3%, OB for The Whisky Jury, refill PX hogshead, cask #2547, 319 bottles)
Ah, a peated one, brace yourselves. We've got much older Millstones to sample at WF HQ, but let's not overdo it with the good stuff all at once. Colour: full gold. Nose: imagine a homemade gingerbread loaded with honey, left in a smoker for a good while. Simple, isn't it? With water: a profusion of vegetal ashes, cigar smoke, horseradish, rowan, and mullein, with a hint of holly eau-de-vie, then Brussels sprouts. Save the Brussels sprouts! Mouth (neat): it packs quite a punch and is extremely concentrated, making it a bit bitter at this stage. Citrus peels. With water: still firm and rich, but more approachable, with touches of ripe strawberries (a classic in some peated whiskies, in my personal experience), then pepper, turmeric, and hints of juniper. And pepper again. Finish: very long, surprisingly balanced, but still a tad extreme. Bitter oranges, salt, Brussels sprouts, seaweed, tobacco, pepper... rather extreme pepper in the aftertaste. Comments: I love it, but it's still a young pup. One of those that nip at your ankles, just for fun.
SGP:566 - 87 points. |
|
July 28, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
A word of caution
Let me please remind you that my humble assessments of any spirits are done from the point of view of a malt whisky enthusiast who, what's more, is aboslutely not an expert in rum, brandy, tequila, vodka, gin or any other spirits. Thank you – and peace! |
Malternatives on Sunday: a Few Anniversary Rums
As promised, here are a few aged rums we've saved for later. They aren't necessarily extraordinary bottles, but we're taking the opportunity to enjoy them as WF's anniversary falls on a Sunday! We might add a couple of new ones at the end. |
|
|
Aguardente de Cana 1928 (Madeira, 1960s)
They produced a lot of aguardentes in Madeira to fortify wines rather than to export it as a drink, with sugar cane primarily used for sugar production. Note, the appellation (DOP) rhum agricole de Madera was only established in 2011. This old aguardiente surely does not meet the criteria for such an appellation, but it's always marvellous to taste such a spirit. Colour: dark amber. Nose: I adore this earthy and dirty side, very much about slag, basalt (isn't Madeira basaltic?), balsamico, curry, walnut, mustard, seawater, but also glue and varnish, turpentine essence… Truly, there's a small yet magnificent grand-arôme aspect. Can you imagine, 1928! Mouth: we are close to the driest wines of Madeira, to the point of wondering if there's some marc or fine in this very lovely old sugar cane spirit. Again, an earthy side, a bit meaty, evolving towards black olives, molasses, gravy, very dark caramel, and also a touch of tar, mint, and liquorice. The structure is not massive, but the whole retains a lot of vitality. Finish: slightly short, but very nicely peppered, salty, and liquorice-like. Balsamic vinegar and caramel return in the aftertaste, with a small sweet note. Comments: the foundations of a solid appellation contrôlée were already there. I also love how Madeira rums are often quite close to the island's wines.
SGP:562 - 88 points. |
This one might be close... |
|
Rhum Martinique ‘Grand Arôme’ (44%, Union des Négociants pour l’Alimentation, France, 1960s)
These types of bottles were common in France back in the day, mainly used for cooking, flambéing crêpes, making rum babas, pastries, marinades, and the like. And sometimes for cocktails. The fact is, you occasionally stumble upon real beauties, even if here, the closure was a crude plastic cap that surely wasn't meant to last this long. So, typically a cooking rum... By the way, I remind you that nowadays, to be labelled 'Grand Arôme', a rum must contain at least 500g of esters per hectolitre of pure alcohol. Colour: gold/bronze. Nose: well, here we are, close to Madeiran style, as expected. Olives, varnish, tar, glue, menthol, terpenes... but less on fruits and nuts. In fact, it's quite simply closer to today's Jamaican style. Lots of fermented cane juice, but nothing suggests this rum is ‘pure juice’, probably not. Mouth: there's still an agricultural side, to be honest. Salt, zest, liquorice, seaweed, overripe banana, cinnamon, cane syrup, ground coriander, and a few touches of ripe strawberries. Ethyl acetate? It's an ester... Finish: medium length, sweeter (brown sugar), orange liqueur. There was probably some ‘doctoring’. The finish is not its best feature. Comments: always worth having a look at the back of our grandmothers' cupboards!
SGP:652 - 85 points. |
|
Royal Navy ‘Black Tot’ (stone flagon, 1950s)
This renowned rum was served to the British Navy until 1970. Some of the remaining stocks were later gathered and bottled by Sukhinder Singh and his gang, much to our delight, but here we have an original flagon that may have travelled the world many times. Note that the image is not of the flagon we are tasting, but it is very similar. We presume this is a blend of rums from British Guiana, Jamaica, Barbados, etc. Colour: mahogany. Nose: varnish, tar, very ripe bananas, liquorice, caramel, chocolate, and toasted nuts. Perhaps a hint of seawater. I suppose it’s too late to enlist in the British Navy? Mouth: it must be about 45% vol. Very thick, with plenty of salted liquorice and old nuts, indeed some seawater, bitter orange, perhaps a touch of (added) molasses, and truly that thick, typical profile. A hint of Port Mourant, unless there’s some Skeldon or Albion in it. It’s very good. Finish: long, salty, with coffee liqueur and more olives this time. Comments: I’m still going to send an application to the Royal Navy, you never know. I imagine we have in our glass a blend for Senior Officers.
SGP:663 - 88 points. |
Here, we've already tasted the following one, but it was a long time ago and it was a different bottle (as usual, any excuse will do, S.) ... |
|
Alfred Lamb’s Special Reserve Rum 1949 (40%, United Rum Merchants, bottled in Dumbarton, Jamaican, 510 bottles)
Several rumours on the internet suggest this might be from Hampden. Colour: full gold. Nose: it’s difficult to confirm as it seems too soft and mentholated for Hampden, but perhaps they produced a different style back then? The profile is magnificent, though slightly light and fragile. Old cellar, damp earth, almond wine, moss and ferns, linseed oil, noble molasses (whatever that is), then lots of perhaps slightly tired vegetables (soup), liquorice wood, medlars, horse saddle, stable... It seems a bit different from the last time, but that was in 2012 and, as we said, a different bottle. After so many years, bottles can diverge, which is part of the sport (and provides excuses to taste again). Mouth: one of the rare cases where such a low alcohol content poses no problem. It’s like a very old dry port, with lovely notes of buds, mint and anise, old fruit eaux-de-vie, marzipan, but also much less wood than last time. It seems to have softened after 12 more years in glass. Old-fashioned cough syrup, the kind so good we’d pretend to have sore throats to sip a couple of centilitres in peace. The beginnings of true preventive medicine. Finish: not so short but more liqueur-like, mentholated, with drops of very old chartreuse and tar liqueur. Comments: a very fine bottle, though, let’s admit, the low wattage causes some slight frustrations.
SGP:651 - 87 points. |
|
Mount Gay ‘Extra Old’ (40%, OB, Barbados, 75cl, +/-1990)
We're not exactly Mount Gay experts, being whisky enthusiasts. It’s true that Foursquare often grabs our attention, and our bandwidth for rum, especially Bajan rum, is rather limited. We’ve tried a more recent XO before and found it ‘very good but slightly average’ (WF 80) back in 2009. Much molasses has flowed under the bridge since then, so let's keep an open mind, shall we? Colour: deep gold. Nose: very nice varnish, even a bit of solvent, then hazelnut, fresh cane, caramel, damp earth, ripe peaches, and a bit of old paper. I do love old papers. Mouth: certainly not a WF 80, though it's a bit light and fragile. More hazelnuts, nocino, earth, old sweet wines, a touch of salt like in manzanilla... By the way, have they ever made an Extra Old Cask Strength? Or at least 100 proof? 80 proof? Finish: short, but full of cane, even vesou, nougat, toasted sesame... Comments: come on, 75 proof? What a pity.
SGP:441 - 83 points. |
|
Mount Gay ‘Eclipse’ (39.4%, OB, Barbados, 75cl, +/-1990)
We tasted a more recent Mount Gay Eclipse and found it a bit weak for our liking (WF 72 - very much an 'eclipse'), but we're more motivated than ever! Colour: gold. Nose: a very lovely old version, saltier, more secondary, even tertiary, with broth, coffee, fresh cement, mushrooms, tiny notes of solvent, then those famous strawberries we just found in the old grand arôme from Martinique. Toasted pecans follow, bringing everything together nicely. Mouth: of course, it lacks punch, but it’s good, toasty, with cappuccino, roasted nuts, sugarcane juice, then hay and little biscuits. But it drops off rather quickly, unfortunately, veering somewhat towards an entry-level Cuban style. Still, it remains pleasant. Finish: short. Amusingly, the strawberry (in yoghurt or candy form) remains present. Comments: it's really good, but the XO had more personality, if not exactly groove.
SGP:440 - 81 points. |
Last attempt with a Mount Gay, this time already from the current owners' period I believe (Rémy)... |
|
Mount Gay ‘Tricentennial Selection’ (43%, OB, Barbados, 2003)
This one seems to fetch ludicrous sums, akin to that of a third-hand Golf. It’s purportedly a blend of vintages 1969, 1974, and 1976, making it about 26 or 27 years old. Never had the chance to taste it before. Colour: amber. Nose: once again, it’s astonishing how an extra 3% changes everything. We used to call it the Laphroaig 10 effect; the 43% version was immeasurably superior to the 40%, as admitted by the distillery manager of the time (sweet Iain). Back to Barbados, it’s lovely, with an obvious kinship to Foursquare (I know the latter is much more recent), seeming like a blend of column and pot still. Wonderful orange blossom water, honeysuckle, sugar cane, muscovado, toasted pistachios, sesame... Let’s hope the palate holds up. Mouth: it does, quite well indeed, remaining fairly tense, sweet but balanced, with sugar cane syrup, honey, and nougat, then crème de menthe. It’s still a light rum, somewhat inoffensive but elegant, with a lovely honeyed quality. Finish: a bit short but sweet, caramelised with honey-roasted peanuts. A tiny hint of salt in the aftertaste. Comments: I forgot, Mount Gay was founded in 1703, hence the tricentenary in 2003. Note, there’s also a ‘1703’ cuvée which is quite good (WF 84).
SGP:541 - 85 points. |
Let’s now add a few newer ones, if you please… Let's go back to Madeira then! |
|
William Hinton 3 yo (40%, OB, Madeira, +/-2023)
William Hinton 3 years old bears the name of an Englishman who, in the 19th century, developed the sugar and rum industry in Madeira and built a large distillery. The latter closed its doors in 1986, but the distillery Engenho Novo da Madeira, created 20 years later, took up its column still. Colour: deep gold. Nose: very rich, with a fair amount of molasses, toasted wood, slightly overbaked cakes, roasted nuts, pancake sauce, then plenty of honey and soft liquorice. I also find a lot of maple syrup. Mouth: very sweet (molasses) and marked by syrups, cane and maple. A bit in the style of some Mauritian rums but with a slightly spicier structure in the background. Vanilla and liquorice allsorts, on a base not so light despite the low strength. Finish: quite long, sweet, this time very caramelised. Comments: much better than a version of the 3 yo at 45% which seemed to have been boosted with red wine, but you wouldn't necessarily recognise it as a pure cane juice rum.
SGP:630 - 75 points. |
|
Rhum Hardy ‘VSOP’ (42%, OB, Martinique, agricole, +/-2023)
An old name currently made at Saint James but you can still visit the remains of the old distillerie Hardy (or Habitation Tartane) on the Presqu’île de la Caravelle. Looks like they still harvest canes from the same location. This VSOP is 4 years old. Colour: full gold. Nose: delightfully mentholated and toasted, quite earthy, slightly waxy, very ‘agricole’, developing on yellow flowers, honey, cappuccino, tobacco, and some figs. A slight metallic note that we always enjoy. Then we find more dark nougat. Mouth: absolutely excellent, with a medicinal side (menthol again, eucalyptus) and a sort of lemony liquorice. It almost feels like there’s a touch of Islay whisky, or that the canes were smoked with peat before being pressed. Has anyone tried doing that? We’re not talking about whisky cask finishing, are we? That’s just a shortcut for the lazy. Ahem. Finish: quite long, very lovely. Coffee and caramelised liquorice, mentholated and smoky. Comments: I really like this unusual little agricole.
SGP:562 - 85 points. |
|
Sodade 4 yo ‘Atlântico VO’ (45%, OB, Grogue, Cabo Verde, +/-2023)
We’ve already tried an awesome Sodade 'Botanic Joao' last year (WF 86). We love grogue, it’s made from local sugarcane, like agricole, even if lower quality grogues are said to be made from imported canes. This one comes from local red cane, with a long fermentation using wild yeasts (15 days!) and pot still distillation. The strange finishing in agricole barrels from Martinique (some say in mezcal?) seems a bit odd in this context, but let’s move on. Colour: white wine. Nose: very lovely, oily on the nose, marked by sweet roots (beets, carrots) then sugarcane, buckwheat, small raisins, damp earth, and autumn leaves. A few touches of tobacco and cinnamon too. Mouth: a little salty and vinegary at first, which I like a lot, then olives and seaweed, a touch of mustard, finally sugarcane, tobacco, bitter almonds, orange marmalade, and very dry riesling. A high-level cachaça side. Finish: long, with that magnificent and unusual acidic note and a beautifully earthy/dirty aftertaste. We always love that. Comments: just superb. These grogues should be better known.
SGP:462 - 86 points. |
|
Trois Rivières ‘Rhum Vieux de l’Océan’ (54%, OB, Martinique, agricole, +/-2022)
We tasted a superb multi-vintage last week, so let’s keep the momentum going! In the past, some Trois Rivières have been too woody for me, while others were perfect. Let’s check this truly bizarre, almost frightening bottle… Especially since the reduction from 75% to 54% ABV was done with… sea water. Yes, really. Colour: gold. Nose: round, caramelised, almost sweet. Corn syrup, popcorn, cane syrup, fudge… It’s a wee bit ‘flat’, without particular character, but water might change things. With water: it changes a bit, with fresh paint and putty, but you don’t really get the ‘ocean’. It’s not like a platter of 24 oysters with lots of seaweed, if you know what I mean. Mouth (neat): strong ‘agricole’ presence now, with touches of lavender, bitter oranges, earth, geranium jelly, cinnamon flan… You feel some salt but not at the level of 15% sea water. We’ve all gulped seawater at some point, it’s very different, isn’t it? With water: a bit spicy and very floral (lots of lavender this time), with a gin-like side, juniper, coriander seeds… Finish: long, woody, peppery, earthy, quite ‘agricole’. A certain salinity indeed in the aftertaste. Comments: you feel a bit of salt on your lips, but we’re quite far from the ‘salmiak’ side we expected. It remains a very good rum, of course.
SGP:551 - 83 points. |
Since we’ve already tried several Madeirans… |
|
Hampden ‘Madeira 2023’ (63.4%, The Colours of Rum, Jamaica, cask #38, 1500-1600 gr/HLPA, 88 bottles, 2024)
Oh what a fool (I’m talking about myself) I thought it was a Madeira rum. Tasting this little DOK now is like fast-forwarding an old Betamax VCR and reaching the end of the movie too quickly (and accidentally discovering the murderer). Remember? Anyway, its oloroso cousin was magnificent last week (WF 89) and we know Madeira suits rum much better than sherry. Don’t you agree? Colour: partridge eye! It was a red Madeira! Nose: forget it. Twelve litres of acetone, a few drops of ammonia, nail polish (and nail polish remover, while we're at it), Spanish olives, diesel fuel, cider vinegar, brake dust (from a Tesla) … And no red wine so far, but I can’t see how any red wine, even Pétrus or Romanée-Conti, could stand out in this extreme context. With water: the same, plus a touch of mustard. No red Madeira, niente, nada, nichts. Mouth (neat): Hampden DOK. Insane. With water: really very good, perhaps with a bit of cherry liqueur and Szechuan pepper, but the rest is pure DOK. Finish: DOK. Comments: DOK with a touch of cherry.
SGP:463 - 90 points. |
Let's get to the bottom of this... |
|
Hampden 1 yo ‘DOK’ (52%, OB, La Maison & Velier, The 8 Marks Collection, Jamaica, ex-bourbon, 20cl, 2024)
From the renowned collection of 8 marks by Hampden, bottled in 20cl. I'm still pondering whether I prefer last year's 'white' version, which was utterly superlative. Please don't read too much into that. Colour: straw. Nose: well, the spirit is so powerful and precise that no cask type could claim to have any influence for, let's say, thirty years. I'm barely exaggerating. With water: sublime varnishes, olive oils, puncture repair glue, and very fermented fruits… Mouth (neat): give it up. Varnish, ultra-rotten plums, carbon, wood glue, etc. With water: but it's so good! Lots of salty liquorice has joined the mix (about 10% salt). Finish: very long, with similar notes, then a more medicinal and bitter aftertaste. Comments: my dear wife tells me it tastes like Williams pear, well I didn’t marry her for her spirits analysis abilities.
SGP:463 - 90 points. |
We remind you nonetheless that DOK stands for 'Dermot Owen Kelly-Lawson', the highest ester count at Hampden and in the whole of Jamaica, and perhaps in the entire rum world, not too sure… But let's take a short break before moving on to the next ones… |
|
Isautier 16 yo 2005/2021 (65%, OB, La Réunion, lot #16/17, 502 bottles)
This one’s an agricole Isautier, rather than the more common traditionnel or industriel variant. It spent 1 year in new wood followed by 15 years in refill casks, sometimes referred to as ‘roux’. Quite the opposite approach to what most Scottish distilleries favour these days. Colour: amber. Nose: a bit challenging at first due to the high ABV. Some putty perhaps? With water: opens up nicely with delicate hints of tomato bush, geranium, fresh paint, putty, sesame oil, a touch of formic acid, and lemon oil. Mouth (neat): über-agricole indeed, with notes of mentholated glue, ginseng and turmeric liqueur, bitter herbs, and lavender-scented soap. With water: becomes excellent, revealing samphire, capers, sage, wee bell peppers, tarragon, and more paint. Finish: long and chemical in a splendid way, bursting with grapefruit and lemon skins, including that bitter white pith. Comments: water is absolutely essential for this one. Without it, this high-powered Isautier remains crazy. Utterly awesome.
SGP: 461 – 87 points. |
|
Chichigalpa 2002/2013 (63.1%, L’Esprit, Nicaragua, cask #BB5, 100 bottles)
I’ve always been keen to try this one, but it has been languishing in a box for quite some time. This happens to many rums at WF Towers, alas, and we deeply regret it. We could really use a week with three Sundays. This should be a Flor de Caña, as I believe there’s only one distillery in the country, so no need to play Hercule Poirot. Colour: gold. Nose: vanilla, vanilla, vanilla, and sunflower oil, with a hint of coconut. Utterly delightful... With water: notes of mandarin juice and a bit of brown sugar. Very inoffensive, yet elegant. It’s always a treat to taste these rums without any additives, isn’t it? Mouth (neat): light structure, plenty of ethanol but also some hay wine (which is very good) and little dried white fruits, like white mulberries. With water: and goji berries. A touch of white tea. Finish: not very long, but I insist, elegant, soft, discreet, and well-mannered. Faint hints of fresh button mushrooms in the aftertaste. Comments: fantastic job bringing this out. I believe it’s well above anything the owners have offered in recent years.
SGP: 441 - 84 points. |
|
Long Pond 17 yo 2006/2023 (60.1%, Zéro Nine Spirits for Clos des Spiritueux, Jamaica, Série Geisha #1, 288 bottles)
One might wonder about the connection with Japan, but does it really matter? Colour: amber. Nose: these Long Ponds perfectly straddle the line between esters (olive, petrol, varnish) and tropical fruits (mango, very ripe banana…). It’s quite magnificent. With water: more varnish, paint, linoleum, dried seaweed, kippers, and a bundle of liquorice straight from Scandinavia (there’s your Jamaica connection, I’m sure) … Mouth (neat): how marvellous these Long Ponds are! The mentholated tobacco aspect is quite spectacular, with salt, pepper, ash, and soot too. It’s rather drying, but in a very lovely way. With water: notes of petrol, olives, and slightly bitter citrus. Finish: very long but turns rather bitter and very herbal. Perhaps not its most charming side. Comments: we were at 90+ until the finish, which was slightly drying and bitter, but that’s quite common.
SGP: 363 - 89 points. |
Good, we’re running out of benzine, see you later. Happy 22nd, Whiskyfun. |
(Thanks a lot Francesco, Nicolas, and Sebastian!) |
Check the index of all rums we've tasted so far |
|
July 27, 2024 |
|
|
Whiskyfun turns 22 this weekend |
We'll admit, we were a bit caught off guard by our anniversary this year, especially since my amusing country had decided to organise the opening of the Olympic Games on the exact same weekend, and I didn't find the time to write the traditional personal editorial. We'll do that at the end of the year, okay? But in the mean time we may see each other at the Edinburgh Fringe this year, then at the Whisky Show in London (we're going to do a fun ‘blind masterclass’ with Dawn D., Dave B., and Sukhinder S.), then of course at Whisky Live Paris (we'll see what we come up with) and possibly in Mitteleuropa. Que sera sera, qui vivra verra . |
|
In any case, there will only be two sessions to celebrate our 22nd anniversary: today, some terrific Port Ellens and Ardbegs by Angus, and tomorrow, a few rums by yours truly, since it will be Sunday, the official day for malternatives. -Serge |
|
Angus's Corner
From our correspondent and
skilled taster Angus MacRaild in Scotland
|
|
|
Port Ellen & Ardbeg
for Whiskyfun’s
22nd Birthday
I had already been eyeing this wee stash of Port Ellen samples accumulating on my shelves when Serge prodded me and mentioned that this weekend (tomorrow precisely) is Whiskyfun’s 22nd birthday. So, it seems like a serendipitous quirk that I was already planning to do battle with these Port Ellens today - and gives good reason to add into the bargain a modest pile of Ardbegs as well. |
|
|
|
Twenty-two is not a milestone year generally, but in the case of a hobby whisky blog, I would say each year from here on out counts as some sort of milestone. |
|
|
I think it’s important to re-iterate that this blog is a tasting diary and a hobby. We don’t monetise it in any way and we both continue to record and publish notes here because it is a pleasurable and fun past time. For me, personally, and speaking as someone who is also professionally involved in whisky in various ways, it’s also an extremely useful way to keep myself tasting, thinking and writing about whisky for the sake of pleasure and fun. Even if that’s only a handful of notes here and there, it’s a joyful way to exercise that process of tasting a whisky and trying to pin down and communicate what you think about it. |
|
|
It is understandable that sometimes people get worked up about any number of things on Whiskyfun: from individual scores; to scoring methodology; whether or not or to what degree to comment upon pricing. These are all understandable areas that cause intermittent ripples of disagreement or debate in our community. I would say that over the nineteen years I’ve been working in whisky (on and off admittedly) and even longer in terms of participation in the wider culture, I would simply offer one important observation: as whisky has become much more expensive, so things like opinions, scores and even tasting notes themselves can become political and more profoundly divisive because we feel like more is at stake. |
|
|
I understand why things written on Whiskyfun might not always be agreed with, but I do think the great strength of Whiskyfun remains the consistency of taste that Serge and I share. The clarity of stated opinion, in that we are both self-confessed lovers of distillate-driven whiskies, and less so fans of overtly oak-influenced, or wine treated whiskies. That position has been a constant on Whiskyfun and, based on the broad feedback I hear from our excellent readership, it’s a position that has allowed many people to make sense of our notes in accordance with their own personal preferences. Which, I hope, makes our often silly and utterly non-professional wee writings, at least of some use and interest within our community. And most of all, I hope it still makes those notes, and Whiskyfun itself, of some relevance. |
|
|
As Whiskyfun enter its 23rd year, I feel broadly optimistic about whisky and its outlook at the smaller-scale, single malt level. There are interesting people striving to do interesting things everywhere, a phenomenon which will, in time, I’m sure, deliver better and more interesting whiskies. Beyond that, I feel a few more strands of pessimism encroaching in relation to the fortunes of the wider, mainstream industry. Relentless pursuit of higher prices for what are essentially mass produced, relatively simple and unhealthy products is not something that feels sustainable in the face of many tough headwinds, both economic and cultural. |
|
|
What I’m certain of however, is that there will continue to be a culture and community that revolves around this funny, frequently delicious, sometimes weird, curiously enthralling drink we call whisky. The fortunes of the wider industry may sway one way or the other, but the community of authentically motivated and passionately interested people remains broad enough and large enough to sustain itself into the future I think. |
|
|
What I am continually reminded of, is that whisky is social, it is about pleasure, about fun, about experience and, above all, about people. If it is not those things, then it is deader than a Kamikaze Dodo - and no amount of five figure trinkets for ultra-high net worth tax avoiders will resuscitate it in the long run. |
|
|
|
Port Ellen 13 yo 1983/1996 (43%, Instituto Ecologico Italiano)
Colour: white wine. Nose: pure seawater and sheep wool with these wee grubby undertones that are very typical PE. Fisherman’s rubber wellies, tarred rope, smoked sea salt and bitumen. Gets increasingly petrolic and gently ashy as well. Mouth: just perfect at 43%! Very pure and briny peat smoke, ashiness, tarred rope again, more rather punchy and fat coastal qualities, grapefruit rind, almond oil, camphor and pickling brine. Superb peaty and briny combination developing. Finish: long, tarry, full of smoked olive oils, tinned sardines, lemon juice and capers. Comments: just perfect young Port Ellen.
SGP: 466 - 91 points |
|
|
|
Port Ellen 1971/1989 (40%, Jas Gordon & Co. Auxil Import France)
Colour: gold. Nose: stunning old school Islay peat that manages to be both somehow drying and coastal but also sweetish and incorporating feelings of smoked honey, dried exotic fruits and natural tar liqueurs. Simple in some ways, but utterly beautiful. I find it a little reminiscent of some 1960s Caol Ila. Mouth: feels little tired at first, but these deeper, bass-like notes of dry, earth peat smoke, coal embers and medical tinctures such as iodine are there and begin to grow in presence with a little time. Lovely drying, peppery and tarry quality. As ever, this is just made a bit problematic by G&M’s bottling practice of chill filtration + 40% + caramel (probably). Gets surprisingly salty and earthy with time, showing some wonderful notes of dried seaweed and tar. Finish: surprisingly long given that initial softness of arrival in the mouth. Glowing peat embers, tar, iodine and this rather sooty / camphor note in the aftertaste. Comments: a wobble on the initial palate, but I think it recovers very finely. Port Ellen had some real glory years in the those first five years of production post-reconstruction. The nose alone is 94-point material but taken altogether I think we’ll go with…
SGP: 566 - 91 points. |
|
|
|
Port Ellen 1978/1992 (43%, Dun Eideann, Auxil Import France, casks #70-77, 3,500 bottles)
An old sub-series of Signatory’s, one which sheltered many incredible bottlings during its lifetime. Colour: white wine. Nose: very different, and at first feels much lighter on the peat smoke, much more dominated by lemon rinds, seawater, wet beach pebbles and delicate medicinal notes of bandages and mercurochrome. Perhaps also a few notes of capers and green peppercorns in brine. A beautiful, lighter take on Port Ellen that still manages to retain some of these more typical ‘dirty’ aspects. Mouth: terrific arrival! Sooty, drying and peppery peat smoke, balanced by seawater, more lemon zest and notes of coal smoke and oysters. Fresh, but firmly on the lighter side of this distillery. Lovely gentle saltiness that works well with these citrus vibes and lighter peat smoke notes. Finish: good length, on a rather crystalline, brittle peat smoke, anchovy paste, pepper and tar. There’s also a fun farmy note that appears in the aftertaste. Comments: the late 70s were slightly less ‘immediate’ vintages at Port Ellen I would say, but this one has a freshness and a clarity of distillate character that is just sublime, even at this humble 43%.
SGP: 455 - 92 points. |
|
|
|
Port Ellen 21 yo 1979/2001 (50%, Douglas Laing ‘Old Malt Cask’, 636 bottles)
Colour: straw. Nose: cleaner than the 80s vintages of PE I would say, much more on crystalline peat and shoreline ‘stuff’. Lots of crushed seashells, seawater, beach pebbles and also bandages and gauze. Some mineral salts and hints of dried seaweed too. With water: very nicely on crab sticks, seashells, mussels in broth, sandalwood and coastal herbs. Mouth: excellent and emphatic Port Ellen oiliness with soft embrocations, white pepper and wee traces of camphor and hessian. A little tar too. With water: pure, coastal, salty and pin sharp with lemon juice, peat ashes and coal smoke. Finish: good length, rather briny, ashy, smoky and on lanolin and kelp. Comments: not a stellar Port Ellen, but rather a bright, clean, slightly lighter and very good one.
SGP: 456 - 89 points. |
|
|
|
Port Ellen 27 yo 1978/2006 (54.8%, Douglas Laing, Platinum Selection, Old & Rare, sherry, 396 bottles)
Colour: pale amber. Nose: stupendous tarriness, mixed with salted liquorice, varnish, cheng pi, dried kelp and umami seasonings such as Maggi. Superb earthiness and dryness with wee cured meats and some preserved dark fruits. Plum sauce, beef stock and salted almonds. Brilliant and tense fusion of peat and sherry. With water: some very old balsamic, pork scratchings, iodine and natural tar. Mouth: brilliant, powerful arrival that also carries clear complexity with it. Many salty, gamey and umami notes, with lovely drying peat smoke too, but never dominating these wonderful, soft and plummy dark fruit notes that are clearly present too. With water: pristinely salty and earthy and wonderfully drying. Remains superbly tense, powerful and rigorously on smoked meats, sea salt, tar and soy sauce. Also herbal bitters and artichoke liqueur. Finish: very long, packing more of the same relentless salinity, earthy dryness, peppery and gamey meat notes and more bitter herbal qualities. Comments: outstanding sherried Port Ellen. Seems like Douglas Laing had many great sherry cask PEs. A profile that’s extremely hard to encounter in whiskies today.
SGP: 567 - 93 points. |
|
|
|
Port Ellen 10 yo 1981/1992 (64%, Cadenhead ‘Authentic Collection’ 150th Anniversary, for Preiss Import, California)
Colour: pale white wine. Nose: more closed and compact, which is to be expected, these super high strength versions are rarely as expressive the older ones. This one displays a rather austere salinity, with hints of ink, wool, lemon juice and concrete. Water is required… With water: getting a bit weird now, on inks, graphite, plastic, burning newspaper and a slightly farmy touch. Mouth: very tough! Some sense of peaty purity as hoped for, but also a rather brutal austerity that again brings to mind concrete, chalk, clay and beach pebbles. Also a little plasticine and vinyl. With water: carbolic acid, lemonade, chalk, paraffin, ointments, tar - extreme in the extreme! Finish: long, hyper-drying, ashy, aggressively salty and again this feeling of brutalist austerity. Comments: not too sure about this one. It’s a little all over the shop, within this very narrow and tough profile. If that makes any sense.
SGP: 268 - 84 points. |
|
|
|
Port Ellen 12 yo 1983/1995 (57.1%, Cadenhead ‘Authentic Collection’)
Colour: white wine. Nose: back to the much more familiar and comforting purity that these production years display when at their best. Stunning freshness at first, full of citrus fruits, coastal air, beach sand, pebbles, coastal flowers and mineral salts. The peat is more elegant and intricate too, a slightly more aromatic and brittle style of peat smoke that I’m used to in young, early 80s Port Ellen. With time it’s getting a bit saltier and little more petrolic and precise. With water: is it possible to have such a thing as ‘complex saltiness’? Really, saline and citric, but full of tiny mineral notes, medical tinctures, cooking oils, samphire, gentian, clay. A rather hypnotic aromatic profile that keeps on developing… Mouth: gloriously pure, oily, peaty and coastal. Retaining this impression of power and freshness from the nose, adding in a few drops of lemon liqueur, eucalyptus oil and black olive tapenade. Also preserved lemons. I almost don’t want to add water, it’s just perfect. But we must do our duty for Whiskyfun! With water: holy moly! Opens up in stunning fashion! Getting broader, fatter in texture, full of smoked olive oil, ointments, medicinal herbs, seawater, grapefruit and lemon again, citrus liqueurs, paraffin and TCP. Finish: very, very long. Tar, peat soot, dried anchovies, capers and more preserved lemons clinging to your teeth for dear life! Comments: A whisky that starts out brilliant, then seems to just improve leaps and bounds with each step. Amazing development and continually captivating.
SGP: 566 - 93 points. |
|
|
|
Port Ellen 15 yo 1981/1996 (62.6%, The Whisky Connoisseur, Cask Master Selection No.3, cask #1391)
Colour: pale straw. Nose: Pure tar, pickling brine, dirty martini, beach bonfire, gherkins, capers, anchovy paste and green olives. Also an almost solvent-tinged peat profile which is just great. With water: wonderfully deep and fat, full of hessian and camphor impressions, smoked olive oil, grapefruit peel and cough medicine. Mouth: superb arrival, with amazing fatness of texture, which carries the alcohol very effortlessly. Many more tarry, camphor and thick peaty impressions. Aniseed, salted liquorice, soy sauce and pure seawater with lemon juice. With water: even more precise, hones in on this very fresh, mineral and coastal profile, riddled with thick peat smoke, tar, medicinal embrocations and seawater. Finish: very long, once again! Brilliantly peaty, pure, oily, tarry, medicinal and yet still with some lively citrus notes in the mix. Comments: brilliant young(ish) Port Ellen. It manages to juggled fatness and tension in an amazing and compelling way. Young Islay whiskies today tend to lack this depth and fatness I find.
SGP: 567 - 92 points. |
|
|
|
Port Ellen 18 yo 1980/1998 (62.2%, Cadenhead ‘Authentic Collection’, 312 bottles)
Colour: white wine. Nose: magnificent! A similar profile but on the cusp of greater age and maturity, and with that comes greater complexity in this case. Beautiful notes of fresh citrus fruits with the expected, and really emphatic, notes of seawater, tar, petrol, iodine and wet kelp. Boiler smoke, aniseed distillate, fennel and chilli sausage, waxed canvas and tarred rope. Totally brilliant! With water: a pure coastal profile now, with waxed lemons, fresh oysters, dried herbs, delicate briny qualities. Wonderful development and complexity. Mouth: again, this sense of purity married with fatness. Pure, vivid and sharp peaty flavours, with coastal and mineral purity, but also an oiliness and thickness of texture in the mouth which is fantastic. Again lemons, limes and grapefruit with even one or two tropical glimmers as well. With water: back to more tarry and peaty power and precision. Still this sense of fatness with more petrol, impressions of smoked olive oil, camphor, iodine and oily sheep wool. Finish: very long! Really dense peat smoke coating the palate. Also lemon and herbal notes, verbena, menthol touches and gentian. Comments: I don’t know 1980 Port Ellens too well, but this one is sensational. What I increasingly realise about these teenage Port Ellens is the combination of purity of flavour and fatness of texture is what really stands them apart.
SGP: 467 - 93 points. |
|
|
You know what we need after all those intense and extremely powerful Port Ellens? Some nice, refreshing Ardbegs… |
|
|
|
Ardbeg 1974/1992 (43%, Dun Eideann, Auxil Import France, casks #2026-2030, 3,800 bottles)
A good example of the kind of rather simple bottling that was made relatively affordably available by early independents and helped slowly but surely shift popular attention onto single malts. Also, very much an artefact from the ‘age of innocence’ when people thought nothing of putting out a sherry matured 1974 Ardbeg in a side-series like this at 43%. How times have changed… Colour: amber. Nose: even at 43%, this immense power of 70s Ardbeg comes through. A stunning mix of fusel oils, pure tar extracts, hessian and a deep, rather sweetish and highly medicinal-tinged peat smoke. Wonderfully dense and aromatic with iodine, dunnage warehouse and heavy camphor all emerging. This is all without even mentioning the sherry, which is really beautifully integrated to the point that you almost don’t notice it, although it is certainly there adding wonderful salty and earthy notes beneath all that stunning peat smoke. Mouth: huge whisky for 43%! Stunningly dry, earthy and tarry peat, full of textural, slightly grubby smoky qualities, black pepper, iodine drops, old rope and oily hessian cloth impressions. I also find many medicinal roots and herbs such as gentian, wormwood and verbena. Also deeply earthy aged black teas. A deceptively complex and hypnotic whisky, even though the dominant impression is of a highly singular, perfect fusion of sherry and peat into one profile. Finish: stunningly long, pristinely salty, herbal, bitter, drying, earthy and immensely rich with thick peat smoke, black pepper and yet more of these wonderfully tarry rope and camphor notes. Comments: the distance between trying old Ardbegs such as this grows greater each year, yet almost each and every occasion is a sledgehammer reminder of just what an astonishing and endlessly idiosyncratic whisky this distillery created during these years. This humble little bottling is up there with some of the best.
SGP: 567 - 93 points. |
|
|
|
Ardbeg 1975/2002 (46.2%, OB for Clan des Grandes Malts, cask #4701, sherry hogshead, 252 bottles)
A very rare official single cask for France! Let’s see how it handles after that brilliant wee 1974. Colour: orangey amber. Nose: amazing how there are such obvious similarities, but this is altogether more about precision and focus, whereas the 1974 was broader and more open in its immediate profile, perhaps due to being a multi-cask vatting and bottled at 43%. This is very narrowly on a stunning mix of iodine and tarry Ardbeg peat smoke. Once again you have the feeling that the sherry cask influence is there, but it’s so deeply entwined and bound up with the distillate that it’s hard to even notice them as separate forces. This one also displays a greater impression of sweetness and concentration, a feeling of herbal cough syrups liqueurs made of gentian and tar. There’s a global touch of fragility to this nose, but it remains hypnotic and undeniably gorgeous. Mouth: a little slow but the progression in the mouth builds and builds to a stunningly thick, peaty crescendo. Syrupy sweet, while also drying herbal and peppery at the same time; one of those whiskies that feels like it should not make sense on paper, the things it is able to achieve simultaneously. Deeply oily, tarry and with an almost fatty, glistening peat presence on the palate. Finish: wonderfully long, stunningly herbal and peaty, perfectly bitter, and showcasing all the expected medicines, tars, wee earthy and meaty notes and this gorgeously tarry aftertaste. Comments: I am going back and forth between these two Ardbegs and they are both subtly different but also so close in their brilliance. I adore the breadth of character in the Dun Eideann, but this one carries and little extra precision and power with it. Both are exceptional reminders of just what a unique and world class spirit 70s Ardbeg was.
SGP: 577 - 94 points. |
|
|
|
Ardbeg 19 yo 1975/1995 (47.3%, Cadenhead, Authentic Collection)
Colour: pale gold. Nose: under the bonnet of the same distillate without any sherry, or even any obvious wood really. Pure medicinal embrocations with many cough syrups, herbal inclusions, tarred rope, whole warehouses of hessian and things like tiger balm, vapour rubs and Bonjella mouth antiseptic. It also has this superb element of varnish, resinous fir wood and salt cured fish. And all that before we even mention this totally glorious old school Ardbeg peatiness. Mouth: this naturally lower cask strength reveals amazing complexity in this spirit, emphatically tarry and peaty as expected, but also many tiny tertiary flavours. Old pressed flowers, dried out old honey, face cream, olive oil, broiled shellfish, crystallised orange, cocktail bitters, aniseed… the list goes on. It’s just a shame the sample I have is rather tiny because you really feel this is the sort of dram that you could sip and analyse in the small hours. Finish: medium, fatty, tarry, full of drying peppery peat, herbal liqueurs and many subtle medicinal embrocations. Comments: the softer side 1970s Ardbeg, but a bit of a revelation in terms of all that complexity on display. An irrepressible and brilliant distillate.
SGP: 466 - 92 points. |
|
|
|
Ardbeg 20 yo 1975/1995 (51.8%, Cadenhead, Authentic Collection)
Colour: pale gold. Nose: amazing similarity, and yet, clear difference. The peat is almost gelatinous and dominating here. Coal tar soap, animal fats, hessian, TCP, iodine drops, pure camphor, tarred rope and richly smoked olive oil. There’s also lemon oil, white mushroom and even wee tropical touches beginning to emerge, which we don’t often find in Ardbeg. With water: a tiny bit of Port Ellen cosplay going on with some slightly ‘dirty’ notes of creel nets and boiler smoke. But otherwise, it’s tarry rope and dry, peppery peat galore! Mouth: surprisingly, it’s the salinity which takes immediate centre stage. Stunningly precise, coastal, salty and full of shellfish broth, Maggi, soy sauce, horseradish and salt-baked cod. Then the peat and medicinal components really begin to emerge in force, also more lemon oil, more tiny wee exotic fruits and things like crystallised honey and classical waxes. With water: magnificent, all of the above but only more so. Stunning and quite breath-taking. Finish: another one that’s extremely long, really getting in the quantum realm of tar, peat, medicine, herbs and shoreline ‘vibes’. Comments: you tend to run out of descriptors and superlatives a bit when tasting 1970s Ardbeg of this calibre. 1970s Ardbeg: 1 English language: Nil.
SGP: 577 - 94 points. |
|
|
|
Ardbeg 27 yo 1972/2000 (50%, Douglas Laing 'Old Malt Cask’, 238 bottles)
Colour: gold. Nose: older and more concentrated. These 1972s tend to involve something of the softer and more enigmatic characteristics of 60s Ardbeg in my view (alas, no known examples of Ardbeg from 1970 or 1971 were ever bottled, to my knowledge). So, we have a totally stunning fusion of thick, rich peat smoke, crystallised honey that verges on aged mead, pure tar extracts, very old herbal liqueurs and many layers of camphor, antiseptic, aniseed, iodine and the brilliant medley of mentholated notes and dried herbs. With water: camphor and herbal medicines and liqueurs galore. Decades old Drambuie diluted with cask strength 1950s Talisker! Mouth: quite simply, the nose in molten, sippable form! Only I’d add there’s a sublime umami and salty savoury streak that runs through everything. The peat is drier and even more powerful. There’s a whole slurry of bandages, antiseptic, TCP, cough syrups and ointments. Then that formidable, relentless tarriness that just keeps on asserting itself over and over at each stage. With water: it brings back these honeyed tones and ideas of mead, liqueurs, old Chartreuse, copper coins, Bakelite, clay, camphor, fennel seed and turmeric. Finish: deep, extremely long and profoundly rich, thick and peaty. Comments: If you put STR staves under my fingernails, I might just admit that 1972 is my favourite Ardbeg vintage. The research continues though…
SGP: 467 - 94 points. |
|
|
Heartfelt bear hugs to KC, Aaron and the folks at the Golden Promise! |
|
|
Happy birthday Whiskyfun! |
|
|
|
July 26, 2024 |
|
|
The Olympic Sessions, around the World, 2
Starting from France, as usual. Come visit France and admire our stadiums, landscapes, distilleries, the new Bugatti Tourbillon and the last true Trotskyists in the world! They are raised at (very) great expense mainly for tourists. French Trotskyist are very amusing with their shabby clothes, colourful language, constant yelling and perpetually angry expressions, you’ll see. And rest assured, they are not contagious. In fact, we are fond of them as much as we’re fond of Sartre, Derrida and vin rouge (which is kind of the same thing, mescaline having fallen out of fashion since Sartre anyway). (AFP). |
|
|
Artesia ‘Fût Noir Char #3’ (46%, OB, France, +/-2023)
Finished in deeply charred wood, but not quite 'alligator'. We recently sampled another excellent Artesia from northern France. Colour: gold. Nose: delightful, with notes of apple and lemon, a hint of coconut, some mango and banana, vanilla, a touch of new wood and foliage, and there you have it. Mouth: you can sense the effect of the heavily charred wood, making the spirit softer and fruitier. Vanilla, banana, apple, plums, gooseberries, with hints of cider and mild beer. Finish: long and more herbal, which surely isn’t from the extreme charring. The mystery deepens… The end of the finish is fruitier, with apples taking the lead. An apple a day keeps… Comments: there’s quite a bit of buzz around these 'deep-charred' woods globally. But it’s rather fun…
SGP:551 - 82 points. |
ndeed, this one is really intriguing... |
|
Mackmyra 15 yo 2008/2023 (55.4%, Alambic Classique, Sweden, Double Matured Selection, Cuba rum barrel, cask #23022, 229 bottles)
It's rather intriguing that Alambic chose a Mackmyra, but couldn’t this be the finest Mackmyra in the world? The second maturation in rum lasted no less than six years. Colour: pale gold. Nose: I'm not entirely sure; grapefruit, clay, porridge, banana peels, sweet paprika (light goulash) … It’s genuinely intriguing. With water: well, raw wool, clay, sourdough. Not much movement. The Cuban part isn't quite from Chucho Valdés! Mouth (neat): not certain, it’s a bit dissonant. Quite a strong bitter and herbal side. Ozzy sings Bach. With water: it’s alright, it’s pleasant, softer, a bit saltier too, but I don’t quite grasp the point of this bottle. Finish: long, a bit bitter, not very pleasant, despite the lovely lemon in the aftertaste. Comments: phew, that's a relief, as all the other recent Alambic bottles we've tasted have been very superlative (ah, the Ben Nevis!) and thus nearly superhuman. They’re humans, after all. Conclusion: strictly no one bottles only absolute splendours, and that’s perfectly fine.
SGP:362 - 78 points. |
|
|
Penderyn 13 yo 2010/2023 (59.5%, OB, Wales, LMDW New Vibrations, second fill bourbon, cask #313/2010)
In my very humble opinion, Penderyn is one of the distilleries that has made the most progress. Who remembers the first batches? Hmm… Colour: white wine. Nose: it’s amusing! Toothpaste and limoncello, very ripe fresh mangoes, Wrigley’s Juicy Fruit, vitamin C tablets (Berocca from Bayer, probably deadly - of course not), then forty tonnes of vineyard peaches. I seem to recall they used to use stainless steel during distillation, which doesn’t seem to be the case anymore when you 'nose' this lovely juice. With water: gentle clays and elegantly honeyed touches. Mouth (neat): it’s fruity like a Bushmills malt. Blood oranges, papayas, mangoes, passion fruits, pink grapefruit… With water: quite magnificent, you just need to enjoy your whiskies excessively fruity. Finish: medium length, exuberant fruits, but a more herbal structure to keep everything in check. Comments: a taster who tastes a lot (perhaps a bit too much) will always be attracted to somewhat extreme whiskies, as their greatest fear is boredom. This may not be the case for a ‘street drinker’. But let’s be honest, it’s a magnificent Penderyn.
SGP:751 - 88 points. |
Last time, we had the Gold Cock from the Czech Republic, and now, here's the Drunk Cats! |
|
Drunk Cats go to Switzerland (49.4%, OB, Old Well whisky, Svach, Czech Republic, Cream sherry finish, 430 bottles, 2023)
I can’t quite recall the exact details of this one, other than it’s a Bohemian whisky, and perhaps I’m better off not knowing. It’s a sort of Czech-Andalusian-Swiss collaboration. Colour: gold. Nose: well, yes, it rather works. Orange cake, fig jam, muesli (hoppla Geisss), Jaffa cake… With water: no. New rubber boots, rather out of context. Mouth (neat): to be honest, this gets really strange. Bay leaves, rubber, a touch of sulphur… With water: turns a bit bitter while staying syrupy. Not a fan of this. Finish: long, rubbery. Comments: cats are odd creatures. Certainly, that’s true of the five mousers we have at WF HQ (Soba, Perle, P’tit Noir, Tigrou, P’tit Blanc-et-Noir), all absolute geniuses, of course. Thank goodness they don’t drink our Brora. Anyway, this feline whisky seems quite ‘artisanal’. It has its good sides, mind you, and it mostly seems to be a bottle ‘for fun’. One can’t be against that.
SGP:462 - 70 points. |
|
St. Killian 2017/2024 ‘Small Batch Unpeated’ (52.4%, OB, Germany, double maturation PX and bourbon)
We’ve had some splendid St. Killians already. Colour: gold. Nose: it’s successful, quite fresh and direct, with a menthol note, fennel, bitter orange, and flat-leaf parsley… It smells like PX seco, and if that’s the case, I bow with deference and envy. I adore PX seco as much as I find PX dulce often vulgar and tiresome. With water: similar, with a few drops of Fanta (our apologies). Mouth (neat): very good! Curry, grey pepper, chilli, honey, blood orange juice, pink pepper… It has an ‘Indian restaurant’ vibe, to be honest, and no, we won’t make RW’s joke about ‘paperback raita’. With water: even creamier, with peach liqueur but also leaves, stems, and pits making it a bit bitter. Finish: long, herbal, a bit salty and peppery. Not the easiest part. Comments: very high highs and a few lower lows. The initial nose was quite superb.
SGP:461 - 82 points. |
One last one to finish (pleonasm alert, S.) |
|
St. Killian 2017-2018/2024 ‘Small Batch Peated’ (62.3%, OB, Germany, 455 bottles)
Hungarian oak (Ungarische Eiche), they say, but is Trump’s buddy V.O. really our friend? (whaaaat? Oh come on, S.) Colour: deep gold. Nose: we knew this would work in our book. Heavily mentholated and piney mango jam, rubber boots and trainers, brake pads, heavy thyme oil. With water: pine needles and cones, in megatistic quantities. Mouth (neat): extreme and awesome. Heavy doom black soviet metal (whatever) in a bottle, with megatons of ashes. With water: that famous full ashtray. Very extreme, piney, ashy, salty… Finish: perhaps one of the longest ever, but it’s full of bitterness. Crazy green walnuts and craziest bitter oranges. We even like this. Comments: utter madness. Be warned, don't drink this when you're alone; it's like while scuba diving, never alone.
SGP:576 - 85 points. |
Current Medal Standing
(July 26, Updated Daily) |
|
|
Gold |
|
UK
Bimber ‘Wimbledon’ (56.6%, OB, England, The Spirit of the Underground, Vino de Naranja cask, cask #310/5, 298 bottles, 2024) |
Silver |
|
UK
Penderyn 13 yo 2010/2023 (59.5%, OB, Wales, LMDW New Vibrations, second fill bourbon, cask #313/2010) |
Bronze |
|
Italy
Exmu ‘Spirit of Sardinia’ (45.5%, OB, Italy, bourbon, +/-2024) |
|
July 25, 2024 |
|
|
The Olympic Sessions Day 1, a new bag of whiskies from around the world (almost) |
|
Here we go again on a journey with some world whiskies… And we start again with France. I don't know if you've been told, but we've just kicked off the Olympics here in France - the official ceremony will take place tomorrow - so we thought we could organise our own events, just for a bit of fun, with whiskies from around the world. |
That said, I don't know how long it will last—several days for sure—but maybe we'll get tired quite quickly and need some more high-quality Scottish sessions again. We'll see. So, are you game? (Well, that was joking close to the ground, S.) |
|
Rozelieures ‘Fumé Collection’ (46%, OB, France, +/-2023)
A smoky Rozelieures matured in Fino sherry (hurray). Rozelieures is made in the neighbouring Lorraine and is among the pioneers of French whisky. It’s now quite a sizeable whisky distillery, although they employ Charentais stills (cognac stills) but handle their own malting. Many are making malt whisky in France, but very few are using proper ‘Scottish style’ pot stills. Colour: light gold. Nose: it’s fresh, nicely peated but also on apple and citrus, all very well-balanced, pleasant, somewhat inoffensive, but we weren’t expecting Brora 1972 or Ardbeg 1974, were we? A few hints of green walnut, likely from the fino. Long live fino! (I insist). Mouth: all is well, still quite fresh, smokier than on the nose, a bit more on herbal and hay smoke, then indeed on fresh walnuts from the fino, plus the usual pepper and salt. Lovely aromatic precision. Finish: medium length but with increased salinity. Some little apples to distil. Comments: I find it technically quite perfect; I imagine it’s had a few years in the cask.
SGP:454 - 84 points. |
|
Gold Cock 'Peated' (45%, OB, Czech Republic, +/-2023)
What a laugh we've had since we first heard of this brand over 20 years ago! It became a bit of a running joke amongst enthusiasts, gifting it to each other for a chuckle. There's certainly a market for these kinds of jests. That said, we’ve only tasted Gold Cock once, a 3-year-old produced around 2003. It was a bit challenging back then (WF 45 - but we had a good laugh!), but they’ve likely improved things over twenty years, so let’s see… after all, the cock is the emblem of our country, isn’t it? Colour: gold. Nose: quite likeable, there are ginger cookies, turmeric and paprika cream, a bit of honey and vanilla, quite a lot of elderflowers, rosemary and some barbecue smoke… not bad at all, quite different from your average peated whisky. Mouth: it’s funny and pleasant. A smoky sawdust character that works well, developing mainly on lemon and fresh ginger. Finish: good length, nice freshness, a touch of mustard, lemon liqueur and a light curry. Comments: Gold Cock is made by Jelinek, I think I’ve sampled some of their products from the Iron Curtain days. Anyway, the Gold Cock brand has come a long way in twenty years, + 37 points.
SGP:555 - 82 points. |
|
Fary Lochan 'Sherry & Peat Batch #001' (50.5%, OB, Denmark, oloroso & Islay hogshead, 600 bottles, 2023)
The whiskies from Fary Lochan are often quite amusing and certainly unusual. That said, I haven't tasted many. Colour: golden amber. Nose: varnish and roasted nuts, fresh peat, a bit of mild cheese (gouda, cheddar), then baked peppers and smoked meats. When I told you it could be special... the pepper side is very impressive. With water: redcurrants and damp earth, Italian black cigars, machine grease... Mouth (neat): a very 'rye' side, pumpernickel, pecan pie, and above all, lots of smoky brown beer. With water: increasingly unusual, but lovely all the same. Cynar, Fernet Branca... Finish: medium length but very nice peppery bitterness. Cloves, smoked paprika, peppers glazed in wine... Comments: lovely and, above all, not boring for a moment.
SGP:563 - 85 points. |
|
Sall 3 yo 2020/2023 (61.1%, Whisky Watcher, Denmark, bourbon, cask #29, 159 bottles)
The barrel came from Garrison Brothers’, which isn’t bad news. It is our first Sall ever. colour: very pale white wine. nose: it’s like barley eau-de-vie, and we’re not complaining. It’s really not far from young kirsch, in fact. We appreciate that no one seemed to have the idea to tamper with this almost-new-make, so it remains 100% natural. The bourbon cask was most likely ‘very refill’. With water: barley porridge, sweet mint, Gravensteiner apple, eau-de-vie... Mouth (neat): eau-de-vie all the way. Mirabelle plum, service tree berry, holly, plus a touch of lemon juice, pear juice, and just a tiny bit of very discreet vanilla. With water: excellent barley eau-de-vie, pears and apples, hints of beer... finish: medium length, lovely fruitiness, lovely balance. comments: they also make a lot of gin at Sall, like pretty much everyone else on this planet. Even we at Château WF made our own gin. Not saying we drink it, mind you...
SGP:641 - 84 points. |
|
Sall 3 yo (60.6%, OB, ex-bourbon, Denmark, ex-Fondillon, 2024)
Fondillon is a rare and somewhat posh wine from Alicante. I have no idea about the (possible) relationship between a Fondillon cask and a young Danish distillery. Not sure the little photo of the bottle matches either, but here we go. Colour: gold. nose: I should add that I’ve never tasted Fondillon. Soft, vanilla malt with sweet beer, grilled malt, and a basket of raisin bread. It’s nice, quite inoffensive, but yes, nice. Hints of orange liqueur. With water: more sweet and fruity ale. Sweet beer and pear juice. Mouth (neat): lovely power, figs, sultanas, touches of caramel, praline… With water: aged pear eau-de-vie in very well-matured wood. Old pear aged in wood, it’s pleasant and quite rare, except in Calvados, notably Domfrontais. Finish: quite long, malty, fresh, fruity, on sweet beer, IPA etc. Comments: my first Fondillon! Certainly, it was blended with whisky here but still. Very lovely very young whisky.
SGP:641 - 83 points. |
|
Exmu ‘Spirit of Sardinia’ (45.5%, OB, Italy, bourbon, +/-2024)
All is good, 200-hour fermentation, direct-fired stills, very local barley... and Sardinia, of course. Colour: gold. Nose: one could have called this session ‘50 shades of cereals’. Superb combination of vanilla and papaya, stems and leaves, small touches of camphor, dill, lemongrass, a tiny bit of cellulosic varnish, little orange sweets... All of this is perfect, precise, and fresh, and even downright impressive. My first Exmu and I hope it won’t be the last. Mouth: magnificent fruitiness, mangoes, pink bananas, old white wine, nuts, sweet pepper, Szechuan pepper... But what is this thing? Finish: and here comes the mango, with a touch of liquorice wood. A very light hint of viognier and even lychee. Comments: bravo the Italians, they have more luck with their whiskies than with their football (we the French too, having said that).
SGP: 641 - 88 points. |
|
Bimber ‘Wimbledon’ (56.6%, OB, England, The Spirit of the Underground, Vino de Naranja cask, cask #310/5, 298 bottles, 2024)
They are truly geniuses at Bimber, as they managed to anticipate the victory of a Spaniard, Carlos Alcaraz, at Wimbledon this year by housing this baby in an orange (the fruit, not the style) wine cask that one would doubt wasn’t Spanish. It seems this is a genuine double maturation, with three years or more in this orange wine cask. We must admit, we’re very curious... Colour: full gold. Nose: you do find orange, but you find orange or orange cake or Jaffa cake in many malt whiskies. It almost gives it a little natural Dalmore touch. With water: indeed, orange cake and a slight IPA note. Mouth (neat): a creamy side, certainly very marmalade-like, but without being too vulgar, there's a certain balance maintained. The chocolate really adds a very pronounced liquid Jaffa cake note. Of some sort. With water: it feels like a bourbon cask is responding, with banana, vanilla, and quince. The balance is even more... balanced (bravo, S.). Finish: rather long, this time with Szechuan pepper. It was to be expected. Comments: I like this ‘travel’ aspect. After all, many journeys start with a ride on the Underground. I’m also very happy not to have a Bimber ‘Waterloo’ – or ‘Trafalgar’ – in the WF sample library. Of course, I’m jesting.
SGP: 641 - 88 points. |
The entire planet now produces good, even very good whisky, which is quite impressive. See you soon for more whiskies from around the world. In the old days, it was very rare for a 'world whisky' to score 80 on my personal scale. |
Current Medal Standing
(July 25, Updated Daily) |
|
|
Gold |
|
UK
Bimber ‘Wimbledon’ (56.6%, OB, England, The Spirit of the Underground, Vino de Naranja cask, cask #310/5, 298 bottles, 2024) |
Silver |
|
Italy
Exmu ‘Spirit of Sardinia’ (45.5%, OB, Italy, bourbon, +/-2024) |
Bronze |
|
DenmarK
Fary Lochan 'Sherry & Peat Batch #001' (50.5%, OB, Denmark, oloroso & Islay hogshead, 600 bottles, 2023) |
|
July 24, 2024 |
|
|
A little hotch-potch of blends (Everyone is blending!)
I suppose it is always interesting to be able to offer your own brand without relying too much on specific distilleries, while staying as much as possible in the world of malt, the most valued.
|
Cactus in Corsica, photo by Christophe A., July 2024 |
|
Scallywag ‘The Chocolate Edition’ (48%, Douglas Laing, blended malt, Port finish, 2024)
An assemblage of Speyside whiskies designed to pair with chocolate, much like malts offered to accompany cigars. Note, this has nothing to do with the use of ‘chocolate malt.’ Colour: gold. Nose: we’re greeted with a strong sense of dark, malty beer, reminiscent of Guinness, and a hint of Linzertorte, likely due to the Port influence. Quite pleasant, and it doesn’t come off as a malt with a mere layer of Port—thankfully. Mouth: the palate leans more towards wine, with clear notes of Port, black cherry, strawberries, roasted malt, and indeed, chocolate. Think along the lines of chocolates filled with orange—rather delightful. Finish: Rather long and more peppery, with flavours of redcurrant jelly and bitter chocolate. Comments: It has a bit of a premix vibe, but it's well-crafted and doesn’t clash. No screeches.
SGP:541 - 83 points. |
|
St. Bridget’s Kirk ‘Solera Batch #2’ (48.4%, Hannah Whisky Merchants, blended malt, oloroso finish, 214 bottles, 2024)
Apparently, there's more than just Oloroso here. We really enjoyed the first batch (WF 87). Colour: gold. Nose: this isn’t too far removed from the style of Scallywag, with notes of red fruits, raspberry liqueur, and more raisins, making it fruitier and, of course, less chocolatey. In the background, the usual nuts, a touch of smoke and a maritime character without excess, hinting at Orkney. Mouth: more tense, certainly peated and lemony, slightly salty, leaning more towards Skye than Orkney on the palate. A hint of turpentine and lime that’s a bit surprising, even tequila-like, while the Oloroso doesn’t come off as hyper-mega-first fill, if you catch my drift. Finish: long and still curiously lemony, even quite acidic with grapefruit. Comments: a very lovely composition, a bit surprising here and there but that’s part of its charm. Almost makes you want to put it back in a small cask for a few more months to marry further.
SGP:564 - 85 points. |
|
Turntable 'Track #4 – One Way or Another' (46%, OB, blended Scotch, 2024)
Blondie, of course! It’s a bit private but I remember so well when my dad used to bring back records from the States, while they were not available here yet. I particularly remember Television, Talking Heads and, naturally, Blondie. And Cherry Vanilla, but that’s another story. I'm gonna get ya, get ya, get ya, get ya… Colour: white wine. Nose: it’s light, fruity, and grainy, with vanilla and a play of orange juice, and a rather discreet malt. Banana and pear candies, cassata, and even a hint of young Cuban rum. Mouth: citrus juices, kiwi, liquorice allsorts, and small red fruits. It’s very civilised. Finish: of medium length, with a touch of fresh mint that’s quite ‘mojito’. The red fruits return, along with blood oranges at the very end. Comments: very pleasant ‘for a blend’. Refreshing for the summer, very well made.
SGP:630 - 83 points. |
|
Turntable ‘Bittersweet Symphony’ (46%, OB, blended Scotch, 2023)
Everyone thinks of The Verve, but really, it’s still the Stones. Colour: pale amber. Nose: very lovely, I find, with walnut broth, seaweed, dry and sweet sherries, cherry stem tisane, and old PX with more wood, yet without any issue. I quite like this nose. Mouth: perhaps a bit less coherent but still very pleasant, with oranges, honey, raisins, and a bit of a feeling of Malaga aged statically (without solera). Finish: the return of slightly bitter walnuts, it’s rare for an ex-sherry to not smell of walnut at all, in my humble opinion. Raisins and liquorice at the end. Comments: so, The Verve or the Stones? The Stones!
SGP:641 - 85 points. |
One last little Turntable, it's impossible to resist... |
|
Turntable 'Track #5 – Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger’ (59.1%, OB, blended Scotch, 2024)
Par mes compatriotes de Daft Punk, bien sûr! Colour: straw. Nose: more malty and even more citrusy, and undoubtedly more to my taste. Lovely citrons and mandarins, pink grapefruit, mangoes, a hint of wax, and a touch of clay... It's perfect. With water: some ripe pear notes, a sign of youth. Turns out we quite like pear. Mouth (neat): almost the same on the palate, citrus, chalk, paraffin, beeswax... With water: even more vivacious. Very nice malty character, and still waxy with a slight chalky touch. Finish: of medium length, fresh, with a smooth grain, which we always enjoy in a blend. It just loses a bit of tension (and a point, dura Lex, sed Lex). Comments: I'm rather a fan of this one.
SGP:551 - 86 points. |
|
Dad’s Dram (56%, The Whisky Exchange, blended malt, 2024)
A vatting of Highland and Speyside malts. Of course, I’m late once more, but anyway, alas my dear father has been missing for quite a few years. And he didn’t really drink much whisky (he thought Southern Comfort was whisky, which says it all). Colour: straw. Nose: very lovely notes of fresh tree bark, sesame oil, lanolin, then fruit peels and small apples from an old apple tree in an old orchard in a nearly forgotten little village (sob). With water: moving towards wet chalk and sourdough. It's a classic and very pleasant development. Mouth (neat): it's much sweeter and herbaceous at the same time. We’ll mention, once again, limoncello (where’s the bl**dy Ferrari?) then dill and lemongrass. With water: same profile, just a bit sweeter, on syrups and wildflower honey. Toffee apple. Finish: medium length but with lovely freshness. Apple and lemon, 2/3 – 1/3. Comments: one should think of their father every day (take notice, kids).
SGP:551 - 87 points. |
|
Hogshead Import 18 yo 2005/2023 (45.5%, Hogshead Import, Blended Scotch, refill butt, 614 bottles)
Let's say it again and again, the more malt, the better. I know it's fashionable to say that this is often not the case and that these are just beliefs, but we stick to that. Colour: gold. Nose: almond croissant, a bit of milk chocolate, fudge and toffee, nougat, vanilla cream, and a touch of burnt wood... All is well, it's soft and very pleasant. Mouth: you get a bit of the old grain, with that lychee and sweet varnish side, banana cream, and a slightly light texture, but the malt seems to keep control, so it doesn't feel too diluted. A small glass of IPA and some sweeter molasses (does that exist?). Finish: not very long but sweet and gentle. Banana liqueur, apple juice, and a bit of pink pepper. Comments: a very, very good blend (top 5%), just the body is a tiny bit thin, in my humble opinion. But it's a blend...
SGP:531 - 85 points. |
|
The Fife Blend 15 yo ‘Release #1’ (56.3%, James Eadie, blended scotch, 458 bottles, 2024)
If it’s James Eadie, they’ve likely done a significant job on the casks. There are always surprises, generally good ones. Colour: darker gold. Nose: I find the grain dominates a bit, as if it’s been boosted, with ripe bananas and guavas. Of course, we have nothing against ripe bananas and guavas. A bit of vanilla cream, almond syrup, touches of fresh wood… With water: correction, almond syrup and pistachio syrup. Killer stuff. Mouth (neat): it’s extremely unusual and frankly, it feels like rum and pisco territories. A hint of asparagus and fresh sugar cane, bitter almonds, woodruff, amaro… I think I’ve never tasted a whisky like this, but it’s also extremely entertaining. With water: Spanish liqueurs (I know what I’m trying to say), curaçao and ‘parfait amour’, coconut milk and probably a slightly light backbone, but compensated by all these exotic flavours. Finish: not very long but that’s the grain’s fault. Comments: a bit crazy, extroverted, impressive, deviant, seductive. Clearly a rum side. How to score this…
SGP:730 – 83 points (but don’t take that too seriously). |
|
Johnnie Walker ‘Red Label’ (40%, OB, blend, +/-2024)
Last tasting, 2018, not bad at all (WF 78). Ah, a bottle of Johnnie Walker Red Label procured from Carrefour at a rather tempting €15.99, while they recommend this enticing cocktail called the ‘Johnnie Ginger’: fill a glass with ice, add 25 millilitres of Johnnie Walker Red Label, a squeeze of lemon juice, and top it off with ginger ale, garnished with whatever you've got handy in the kitchen (do be cautious about what goes into your kitchen, mind you!). But let’s taste it au naturel, shall we? These brands pushing cocktails—might they be hinting that their whiskies aren’t good enough when enjoyed neat? Colour: Gold. Nose: there’s a touch of Clynelish waxiness, I’d say, along with fresh bread and barley syrup. Think panettone, focaccia, croissants, and pear peelings... quite pleasing! Mouth: well, yes, quite agreeable, and I’d even fancy a 100-proof version if one exists (my knowledge of the full Johnnie Walker range is a bit rusty, I must admit). Lovely little salty-smoky tension, sweet ‘industrial’ apple juice, a hint of liquorice and anise, a slight earthy note, followed by growing salinity. Finish: not even that short. But, of course, as with all entry-level blends, the finish is its Achilles' heel, drifting towards a cardboardy note—though not overly so. A hint of pear liqueur. Comments: honestly, I’m not sure if I’ve landed a particularly stellar batch (this is actually a bottle I purchased incognito in Scotland with my modest savings), but I really do like it.
SGP:652 - 79 points. |
|
Speyside Blended Malt 28 yo 1994/2022 (48.4%, The Whisky Blues and The Whisky Wave, cask #5138, hogshead, 235 bottles)
The brand 'The Whisky Blues' has truly become a hallmark of quality across all spirits. Yet, with this type of blended malt, one must imagine that it is, in reality, a single malt. Now, we just need to figure out which one... Colour: gold. Nose: fresh bread, ripe banana, muesli, mirabelles, quinces, then candied lemons. It’s perfectly precise, impeccably delineated, and leans towards cédrat liqueur. This ultimate simplicity, very Balvenie-esque, is just fabulous after 28 years. Tiny touches of cactus. Mouth: well, of course. Green apple, stewed rhubarb, banana cake, mirabelle tarte, quince jelly, slightly underripe mango… It’s quite taut, it’s perfect. Finish: quite long, more on little lemon sweets. Comments: taut indeed and admirable. And it goes down so smoothly. It’s crazy that all these casks ended up on the market ‘like this’.
SGP:651 - 89 points. |
All right, a last one, an historical one… |
|
Usher’s Old Vatted Glenlivet (J.&G. Stewart ltd., Ditta Modena Import, Italy, +/-1955)
Of course, the label boasts all these certificates of purity issued by more or less official laboratories, which was essential to distinguish it from the somewhat toxic moonshine produced here and there before the war. This is undoubtedly pre-WW2 distillate, bottled in 1952 or just after (note the 'appointment to H.M the Queen' on the label). Let's remember that Usher’s OVG was the seminal blend and that this isn’t the more common ‘Green Stripe’. Colour: gold, clear. Nose: naturally, there’s OBE, translating here into old metal (rusty old tools) and both dried meats and matured ham (jabugo). This lends a reinforced broth quality with honey, white wine, and… whisky. Add old herbal and citrus liqueurs, essentially everything you might find in grandad’s old sideboard. Mouth: yes, it’s alive and retains all its virtues! Lots of herbaceous peat heading towards pine liqueur, well-salted onion soup, old Chartreuse, mead, very old sweet sherry, salted beef marrow… It’s very impressive. Finish: long, even more saline, more on broths and mead. Comments: what a shame we can't precisely determine what was already present in the '50s and what’s the result of bottle ageing, though we do have a pretty good idea, don’t we? A bottle that was particularly splendid, many old blends are somewhat tired.
SGP:572 - 90 points. |
By the way, we have a tasting of a dozen old blends distilled before WWII in the pipeline. We had planned to publish it during the celebrations of the 80th anniversary of the Allied landing in Normandy, but you know how it is, we don't always get to do what we want when we're just small enthusiasts. |
|
July 23, 2024 |
|
|
WF’s Little Duos, today hunting for mirabelles
So, Burnside, so, Balvenie, blended or not, only the official papers might know. We always enjoy tasting them, with their notes of mirabelle plum and quince that are so... well, Balvenie. Especially since these Burnsides have generally not undergone any finishing or in-cask blending with peated whisky, etc.
The picking of mirabelles, engraving, Art Deco, 1914
|
|
|
Burnside 28 yo 1994/2022 (48%, Whisky Age, blended malt, hogshead, cask #5135, 224 bottles)
A very charming little Beethoven by the artist MasonYin, which reminds me a bit of Sempé. Colour: white wine. Nose: pears, apples, mirabelles, and peaches at first, then quince, vanilla cream, and a slight earthy note of forest after the rain. One cannot help but think of white wine, indeed. Let’s say a southern Burgundy, like a Mâconnais. Very beautiful nose, simple and gentle. Mouth: perfect, rather taut, with white peach, greengages, quince, and lemon. Not much to add, it's a somewhat minimalist style and perhaps not very Beethovenian, but it’s very beautiful. Finish: medium length but with a vanilla that becomes more prominent. Then zest and cold green tea for a very refreshing finish. A tiny bit of salty liquorice, in the Dutch style, of which we could consume twelve kilos a day (if we didn't hold back). Comments: a little jewel of freshness and simple elegance. Ode to Joy, perhaps? All these 1994s are really very good.
SGP:651 - 89 points. |
|
Sideburn 31 yo 1992+1993/2024 (51.3%, Whisky Sponge, 404 bottles)
Right, sideburn, so Burnside, got it? So, Balvenie. Colour: gold. Nose: we’re closer to Balvenie’s DNA, in truth, this could have been an official Balvenie of the same age, with all its attributes. Apricot tarte, tarte tatin, quince jelly, mirabelle jam, acacia honey, vanilla custard and all that. I need not say more. With water: notes of ‘a walk in the woods’, a drop of rainwater, some nougat, a tiny coconut ball, some broken branches, liquorice wood… Mouth (neat): creamy, with Earl Grey tea, rooibos tea, vanilla cream, cédrat liqueur, quince paste, green lemon juice (in tiny but noticeable quantities), a small piece of vanilla fudge… It’s funny, it’s rich and precise at the same time. With water: it’s a Balvenie truer than nature, with more white pepper and tea. And some tiny notes of sawdust and fresh vanilla (pods), then the quinces return with a few touches of fresh eau-de-vie, like kirsch. This time I don’t really find mirabelles, rather a bit of grated lemon zest and banana peel. Finish: a bit more herbal and with oolong tea. Grapefruit liqueur in the aftertaste. Comments: in the same league as the Whisky Age, perhaps just a tad more complex. Maybe that’s the multi-vintage ‘à la Sponge’ effect.
SGP:661 - 90 points. |
|
July 22, 2024 |
|
|
On the hunt for Ben Nevis,
Part Cinq and last |
|
Water running down Ben Nevis. Whisky's about water - righ? (Ben Nevis) |
There was nothing in the flights we just did that did not confirm what we already thought about Ben Nevis and its successive periods. Despite the fact that some were good, even very good, we still believe that making heavily peated versions doesn’t necessarily make much sense. Not my business, but let’s preserve the distilleries’ DNA! That said, let’s not forget that distilleries that aren’t peated today could have been very peated in the past, like Bunnahabhain or Bruichladdich. Yes, it’s complicated… Especially as, by coincidence, we have saved some BN for this grand finale that might prove us wrong. Forget any certitudes… |
|
Ben Nevis 2015/2023 (59.9%, The Single Cask, Family Series, fresh sherry hogshead, 292 bottles)
The label features a charming pooch, making me wonder if it truly reflects the bottle’s contents. Colour: dark amber. Nose: unbelievable amounts of salted liquorice and smoked meats, along with that heavily smoked barbecue sauce you find in Tennessee (or perhaps it’s Texas). It’s rich and robust, yet spectacular. Big peat. With water: fresh concrete, exhaust fumes, wet earth, leather, tobacco, mustard, and walnut wine. Mouth (neat): enormous, thick, very smoky, both sharp and sweet, with even more of that famous Texas-Tennessee barbecue sauce and at least forty tonnes of smoked salted almonds. Almonds, that's more California, isn’t it? With water: an abundance of salted caramel and liquorice. The most surprising thing is that the Ben Nevis DNA has managed to survive and even take the lead in the end. Few malts could achieve that in this context. Finish: very long, rich, still quite explosive, with more green nuts and leather. Absinthe. Comments: it’s so concentrated and beastly that with water and neutral alcohol, I’m sure you could make three bottles from one. The worst part is that I love this extreme side so much, I’m almost ashamed.
SGP:576 - 87 points. |
|
Ben Nevis 2012/2023 (54.5%, The Single Cask, Family Series, Laphroaig quarter casks, cask #1732, 116 bottles)
Oh là là, Ben Nevis and Laphroaig, that’s probably like Frazier vs. Ali, or perhaps Lawler vs. MacDonald II. Let’s brace ourselves, but at this stage, there’s not much to lose, is there? Colour: white wine. Nose: this is really quite amusing, it seems like the two malts somewhat cancel each other out since it’s clear, pretty, pure, almost fresh, leaning towards oils (sunflower, sesame, and even paraffin) and freshly cut apple, with a very light smoke. What kind of sorcery is this? That said, water might change things... With water: no, it remains gentle, polite, civilised, with fresh barley, chalk, dough, touches of lanolin, and just a hint of creosote. Mouth (neat): on the palate, it’s a blended malt, honestly. In-cask blending, as we say at Château WF. Tight, slightly salty peat, with leather and mustard. The number one problem here is that it works. With water: excellent blended Ben Nevis. Seawater, lemon, leather, tobacco, mustard, eucalyptus sweets, and bergamot sweets. Those bergamot sweets are so good, they’re a speciality of the town of Nancy in Lorraine (where no bergamots grow, of course). Finish: long, tight, very much on salted and smoked zests. A really salty aftertaste (not saline, salty). Comments: these folks are quite annoying, offering such improbable things that work so well. It’s the best side of ‘modern whisky’.
SGP:566 - 87 points. |
Seminal question: what works best, peated BN or unpeated BN blend finished in an Islay cask? Who says I have the answer? In any case, I really like these people’s approach... It’s Singapore, baby! |
|
Ben Nevis 25 yo 1998/2023 (48.7%, Oxhead Whisky Company and Vinehoo, China, hogshead, cask #757)
We also had this kid left with us... Colour: White wine. Nose: A robust return to soot, basalt, slag, green walnuts, mustard, fino sherry, and potting soil... the most austere style of BN, though not without its charm, in my view. Hints of fresh paint, artichokes, and cactus... Mouth: More fruity but also more mustardy, peppery, with notes of fermentation, bread dough, mache lettuce, asparagus, and green bananas. Finish: Long, tense, green, a tad acidic, and quite belligerent. A touch of bitter orange liqueur at the end of the finish, along with notes of mushrooms and paint. Comments: A BN that challenges your certainties, let’s say. Perhaps the most herbaceous of them all.
SGP:472 - 86 points. |
|
Ben Nevis 26 yo 1996/2023 (48.9%, Royal Mile Whiskies, refill hogshead, cask #1711, 213 bottles)
This should be delightful, as Royal Mile Whiskies have been selecting some cracking drams lately, including a Springbank we're eager to try. Colour: Pale gold. Nose: precisely that lovely mix of polish, soot, overripe apples, cigarette ash, paraffin, and that little chemical touch we so adore in many a Ben Nevis. Perhaps a blend of lemon syrup and nail varnish? Then there's something like pear-flavoured ale, if such a thing exists. Who would complain? Mouth: pure, precise, yet charmingly dirty, sharp, and peppery, with that signature ‘two-stroke’ character adding depth, much like JJ Burnel's bass in some Stranglers tracks. You get me? As usual, the paraffin, wax, and pepper form the bassline here. Don't ask who's on drums... probably the ashes. Finish: long, with a similar profile—pepper, overripe apples, lemon, ashes, paraffin, and all that jazz. Comments: lovely tension. That said, I hate to write this, but it’s probably not for beginners.
SGP:562 - 90 points. |
|
Ben Nevis 27 yo 1995/2023 (50.6%, The Whisky Blues, sherry butt, cask #506, 376 bottles)
Always these lovely labels… Colour: gold. Nose: oh, a bit of Meursault with a few drops of mirabelle eau-de-vie and some apricot liqueur. Simply magnificent, no need to linger on it. Not really necessary but with water: add some old apples. Mouth (neat): the leather, soot, and pepper of Ben Nevis join the chardonnay, apricot, apple, and mirabelle for our utmost delight. With water: a change of direction, the apple takes the lead with a surprising, slightly rough Calvados-like edge, and even a very artisanal kirsch side. Finish: rather long, wilder, earthy, peppery, almost a bit spicy. Comments: what an adventure. But it wouldn’t be BN if it were just a lovely but tame(ish) little malt, would it.
SGP:652 - 89 points. |
We shall put an end this delightful madness with two very old Ben Nevis whiskies, by the aptly named Alambic Classique. Be aware, these old vintages are not necessarily the best… |
|
Ben Nevis 50 yo 1966/2017 ‘Sherry Cask’ (40.6%, OB for Alambic Classique, cask #3641, 163 bottles)
The challenge, if we may call it that, is that the official 1966 releases we have sampled, albeit not numerous, were exceptional, particularly the 1966/2017 for La Maison which was a real stunner (WF 93). So, forget what we previously said about old vintages. Colour: bronze amber. Nose: to paraphrase Talking Heads once again, qu’est-ce que c’est? Is it fig eau de vie distilled by a Turkish tribe with ancestral, undisclosed skills? Pre-war rose liqueur (pre-war, a term that means nothing anymore, agreed), ancient mead? Actually, it is quite close to mead. The old sherry behind it all is superlative, it genuinely seems like a true solera cask that has behaved impeccably. And a few notes of very, very old true gouda. Mouth: it’s strange, but it’s admirable, packed with pipe tobacco, fermented fruits (the fig returns), old wines that seem a bit lost, including aged Bordeaux, then all sorts of leathers and earthy tones. First waters from very old Pu-erh tea (still somewhat tannic) and plenty of cinnamon and liquorice wood. The wood is very forward, but it’s magnificent wood. Finish: longer than expected, fairly bitter and on fir, aubergine and resins, but the return of the old fig spirit at the end more than makes up for all that. Comments: a very old BN ‘in its juice’, simply magnificent. Sometimes, it’s good to be a humble little whisky blogger.
SGP:561 - 93 points. |
A compadre and then we'll be done for good with our Ben Nevis. This time. |
|
Ben Nevis 50 yo 1966/2017 ‘Calvados Cask’ (41%, OB for Alambic Classique, cask #3645, 100 bottles)
I believe this is a finishing, and it's quite possible its companion was as well. Colour: mahogany. Nose: we're very close to a very old Calvados, but with less of that herbaceous side and consequently, a bit more old malt. Plenty of old apples, cigars, cider, sloe, with a reappearance of fig alcohol, dried lychees, old balsamic vinegar... It's clearly a fusion of old malt and old Calvados, but honestly, it works brilliantly. There's also that earthy side of old Calvados. Mouth: old Calvados, without a doubt. Reminds me of the old Camut from the Auld Alliance. Apples, green pears, a touch of cork that's not bothersome at all (quite the opposite, actually), a return of old Bordeaux (cabernet/pepper), then old Armagnac (I swear), but indeed not much maltiness as a consequence. Exceptionally, we're not going to complain about that. Finish: very old Calvados for a good while. Resinous aftertaste (green and black propolis). Comments: more spectacular than the 'sherry', but also a little more deviant. It's still quite sublime, the rest is only politics and philosophy.
SGP:571 - 92 points. |
Thirty-three BNs
Sot thirty-three Ben Nevis, ranging from 4 to 50 years old, which wasn't too bad, especially considering the average level was extremely high (WF 88.09090909 – ha). Thanks to all the bottlers who offer us these admirable Ben Nevis, even the most unusual one still received a score of 80 points, while our favourite scored 93 points. Ben Nevis is certainly a "Grand Cru" in our small and secret personal ranking. |
|
July 21, 2024 |
|
|
|
Angus's Corner
From our correspondent and
skilled taster Angus MacRaild in Scotland
Sunday Malternatives
Many Cognacs and Armagnacs |
|
|
I’ve had very little time to be able to dedicate to tasting anything much of late. Two companies and two children are time consuming apparently. Thankfully I’ve managed to record these notes for assorted Armagnacs and Cognacs that were accumulating here at Whiskyfun HQ Scotland. No need to re-iterate my love of French spirits, only that I still believe they are very much spirits about finesse, detail and subtle difference, not the broad brush strokes of whisky or rum. Although, I would continue to urge whisky friends to go and discover French spirits, there’s level of quality and value for money ratio that hasn’t been seen in whisky for… well, a long time. Now, I would say you can ignore most of the more standard and entry level bottlings and aim directly for the more interesting, indy producers and bottlings, such as… |
|
|
|
|
Jean-Luc Pasquet 2017/2023 (40%, Berry Bros. & Rudd, The Pioneers, Petite Champagne, cask #72, 421 bottles)
Love Jean-Luc Pasquet, great negotiants and even better growers and distillers - not to mention extremely lovely people. Colour: pale gold. Nose: superbly fresh and youthful cognac full of citrus rinds, flowers and many shades of oranges and fruit marmalades. This is where 40% can sometimes be a bit of an asset when the Cognac is otherwise untarnished by sugar or additives and the vibrancy of the distillate is given space to really shine. Mouth: orange oils, flower blossoms and nectars, kumquat, mango pulp and orange sherbet and cordials. There are even little waxy and textural aspects like marrow and honey roast root vegetable coming through. Stunning spirit and a totally wonderful freshness around every corner. Finish: medium, but very wonderfully honeyed and full of natural fruit-driven sweetness. Still a wee rustic, earthy edge in there too. Comments: quite a statement to do such a bottling in this day and age at 40%, it reeks of confidence. Now, personally I’d probably have gone for 48.5% myself ;) Hard to imagine too many whiskies showing so well at this age and bottling strength.
SGP: 551- 87 points. |
|
|
|
Château Laubade 17 yo 2006/2023 (54.8%, Watt Whisky, Bas Armagnac, hogshead, 294 bottles)
100% Baco grapes. Colour: amber. Nose: many typical dark fruits, along with a rather pungent varnish character which speaks to proper, mature, slightly funky Armagnac with this rusticity and slightly gluey character which nods at tropically aged rums. I also find plenty treacle, date molasses and a nice mix of chocolate and leaf mulch. Opens up very impressively I would say. With water: very fragrant, with a big development towards dried flowers, face cream, pollens and bouquet garni of herbs. Mouth: quite prickly with a lot of strong peppery notes, grippy tannin, aniseed, wood spices and strong black coffee. Pretty powerful and perhaps a tad heavy on the alcohol. With water: well tamed now! Much more focused on those dark fruits again, with plenty plums, damsons, stem ginger in syrup, figs and some nutty and wood spice notes. Still with some rather robust tannin. Finish: long, very spicy and peppery now, still a little hot and lively, and some aniseed in the aftertaste. Comments: really the powerful and heavy side of Armagnac I would say, but a style that would please many rum and whisky drinkers. Another excellent selection from the Watt Whisky stable.
SGP: 561 - 87 points. |
|
|
|
Domaine Séailles 20 yo 2000/2021 (54%, Grape Of The Art, cask #19, 195 bottles)
From 100% Ugni Blanc grapes this time, and from the Ténarèze region of Armagnac. Love the excellent people behind Grape Of The Art, undoubtedly one of a handful of new(ish) indies who are at the forefront of bottling and celebrating French spirits. Naturally, they’re from Germany ;) Colour: mahogany. Nose: superb! We are even further into these wonderful gluey, almost solvent territories, along with crystallised orange peel, spiced marmalade, bitter dark chocolate and lovely impressions of unlit cigars and mint liqueur. Love this nose! With water: deeper, earthier, drier and more of this mulchy and rancio character. A few lovely prunes too. Mouth: you can see why this would appeal to rum drinkers, could almost be an old hot climate Demerara with this big notes of rum, molasses, liquorice, wood spice, menthol and medicinal aspects and concentrated dark fruit syrups. Wonderful focus and concentration overall. With water: once again I find prune, prune eau de vie in this case, more pronounced peppery wood spices, leaf mulch, bitter cocoa and resinous hardwoods. Finish: long and spicy, dry earthy and peppery notes, preserved dark fruits and dried herbs. Comments: another very powerful style, I love the even more focussed rustic and gluey profile in this one, superbly concentrated and extremely ‘Armagnac’ - if you get me.
SGP: 561 - 88 points. |
|
|
|
Mauxion ‘Lot 89’ (47%, OB, Bois Ordinaires, +/-2023)
Bois Ordinaires is famously supposed to be a bit… ordinary. But there are many very fine Cognacs from these lands. Colour: orangey gold. Nose: apricot and peach and honey, all very classical, but with a slightly leaner and leafier profile that perhaps lacks the more opulent fruitiness of Fins Bois or Grande Champagne. Mouth: tangerine, change pi tea, bitter orange and some hints of pressed flowers and cedar wood. Feels overall a little hot and gritty at times though. There are some further nice notes that recall fruit gummy sweeties - Cognac by Haribo perhaps. Finish: medium, a little peppery and still with a similar fruit profile into the aftertaste. Comments: all perfectly fine but not too exciting thought.
SGP: 451 - 84 points. |
|
|
|
Laurichesse 'Le Vaillant Lot 76' (48.1%, Malternative Belgium, Grande Champagne, 2023)
Colour: deep coppery gold. Nose: gorgeous! Fruit pies, pastries, pollens, nectars, glazed breads, crystallised citrus fruits, unlit cigars and aged dessert wines. Sweetness balanced by drier and richer aspects. It’s also extremely classical and feels very typical of excellent Grande Champagne. Mouth: some slightly funky and exotic wood extracts, then orange bitters, dried tropical fruit mix, more tobaccos and leathery notes. Like a high-powered very old XO by one of the bigger houses, the sort that used to shelter 50+ yo cognacs. There’s even a slight tang of acidity about it which keeps it extremely fresh and lively. Many dark, preserved fruits, flowers, honeys and nectars. Finish: long, warming and full of citrus, liquorice root and hints of fennel and herbal cough syrup. Superb brightness to the end. Comments: love the sheer effortless and decadent vibes from this. Totally classical old Grande Champagne, but also pure, powerful and undimmed by sugary additives.
SGP: 651 - 90 points. |
|
|
|
Mauxion ‘Lot 45’ (54%, OB, Borderies, 261 bottles, +/-2023)
Usually ‘Lot 45’ would lead us to believe it was really a 1945 harvest, however it seems this one was harvested and distilled in the late 1970s, so perhaps its suggesting 45 years old in this case? I’m very fond of Borderies, it’s the region which seems to most regularly produce cognacs which suggest similarities to whisky. Colour: deep coppery gold. Nose: indeed, I am immediately thinking of some older highland malts, this is earthier, drier, more tense and showing a more subtle fruitiness that involves bitter marmalades, citrus rinds, sultanas and muesli full of dried fruits and nuts, really a profile and style that converges with other spirits at this age. With water slackens and relaxes a little, with some more classical notes of flower honey, dry earthy notes, tobacco leaf and pine wood. Mouth: excellent richness and power, again this is rather more tense, with bitter herbal notes, well extracted fruit teas, earthier components, pollens and feelings of petrichor and even mineral aspects. With water: orange oils, sultanas, raisins, kumquat, runny honey and some green fruitiness as well. Finish: good length, rather sharp and zingy fruitiness which feels nicely refreshing and even some peppery and waxy notes into the aftertaste. Comments: I really like this profile, but it’s true that these Borderies can be rather tough and demand a bit of wrestling to get to grips with them. But whisky people should definitely seek out and taste this one.
SGP: 561 - 88 points. |
|
|
|
Vallein Tercinier 'Lot n° 65' (54.4%, OB, 2015)
These 65s from Vallein already carry a mighty reputation; time to add my two cents into the hat… Colour: bright orangey amber. Nose: wet forest floors, musty wine cellars, top quality dried mushrooms, many tiny spices, tobacco ranging from pipe variety to unlit cigars in a humidor and then tiny notes of dried mint and mint tea. I even start to find a deeper herbal and vegetal quality like Maggi mixed with aged Fernet Branca. I also forgot to mention fruits, all manner of peaches, plums in dessert wine, apricot and dried exotic fruits. With water: hot house flowers, lemon peel, bergamot, medicinal herbs and Mouth: stunning and vivid fruitiness that goes over the top into excessive new territories compared to most cognacs, fruits that are overripe and almost funky. Powerfully on oranges and tangerine puree, mango pulp, flower honeys, kumquat, star fruit and papaya. There’s something tropical that recalls some of the great 1960s single malts (Longmorn, Springbank, Bowmore etc). With water: smooshed dandelions, many more apricots, peaches, stunning notes of yellow plums and a slightly dialled back exoticism now. Also, it is just relentlessly, unyieldingly quaffable! Finish: very long, on plums, herbal liqueurs, wormwood, orange cordial, ancient dessert wines and aniseed. Comments: it’s the sense of effortlessness combined with a feeling that it takes you to territories above and beyond almost all other old cognacs. And it’s not even the best of these 1965s…
SGP: 661 - 92 points. |
|
|
|
Mauxion 1950 (43%, OB, Grande Champagne, +/-2023)
Said to be over 70 years in cask. Colour: orangey amber. Nose: concentrated on oranges, citrus fruit peels, marmalades, dried mushrooms and earthen cellar floors. Also these rather typical characteristics of unlit cigars, dried flowers and a little rancio character which I’m frequently finding in old Grande Champagnes of this age. Mouth: very old school a lot of ‘dark’ honey characteristics, honey on dark grained breads, very old sauternes, kumquat and miso. Treads that perfect tightrope of feeling simultaneously very old but also quite bright and still rather lively. There’s even a touch of acidity about the palate which is really vibrant. Finish: long, earthy, increasingly rustic with liquorice, tree bark, herbal bitters and plum wine, then some dark fruits glowing in the aftertaste. Comments: wonderful and charming old cognac that again ticks this decadence box, throws off some very strong ‘sipping with your feet up’ vibes.
SGP: 561 - 90 points. |
|
|
|
Héritage René Rivière 'Madame Pivoine Lot 25' (48.1%, Malternative Belgium, Borderies, 2023)
Theoretically this should be a 1925. Colour: deep gold. Nose: once again with Borderies I’m finding a tenser, drier, more herbal and earthy profile that again makes me think of some very old - and old style - malt whiskies. Touches of truffle, wild mushroom, parsley, liquorice, darjeeling tea and dried mint. Also some slightly medicinal herbal notes such as wintergreen and angelica root. Mouth: again this feeling of spirits and styles covering with age. There are parts of this that immediately make me think of old Glen Grant, while others suggest well-aged Demerara rum. What’s for sure is that it’s a more complex and challenging style revolving around roots, herbs, medicinal qualities, dried out fruits, tobacco and old ointments, bitters and liqueurs. Finish: medium in length and perhaps running out of steam in terms of power, but still some lovely notes of old sun lotion, dried out honeys, cider apple and ink. Comments: Malternative Belgium seem to have perfected the art of unearthing these wee nuggets of pure liquid history. Utterly charming and fascinating, if not totally technically brilliant old Cognac. Again, whisky people that would like to be pleasantly surprised by Cognac: try this!
SGP: 461 - 88 points. |
|
|
|
Borderie Lauzac 1906 (37.3%, OB?, bottled circa 1950)
This was an old bottle I bought at auction quite a few years ago and decided to open recently with some good friends. The ABV was measured with my Anton Parr. Colour: pale amber. Nose: a much more old-fashioned style, and you feel that there has probably been something added with this deep mulchy note and rather strong impression of old Demerara rum (which it was not uncommon to use as an additive for cognac in these days). That being said it’s still extremely alluring with very vivid notes of sticky dark fruits, sultana, raisin, prune and date. Very dark and very rich and unctuous with good rancio character. Mouth: a little sweeter than expected, and still showing remarkably good power given the age and ABV, again feeling the inclusion of some additive components here, but it doesn’t diminish these rather simple but charming old style cognac characteristics. Very dominated by leaf mulch, mushroom notes, many variations of tobacco, humidor, cellar must, funky old pinot noir and even wee hints of hessian. Finish: medium and rather sweetish, going into dessert wine territory while still showing some of these lovely earthy, mulchy and tobacco characteristics. Comments: a very old-fashioned style of cognac I’d say, and markedly different from the other Borderies we tried in this session. The sort of cognac that you could imagine demolishing many centilitres of while tackling a large cigar - which I’m sure some good folks probably did with this very cognac in decades past.
SGP: 471 - 88 points. |
|
|
|
Château Jousson 'Sélection 1875' (OB, Fine Champagne, magnum, +/-1950)
A magnum bottle that I opened and poured at my wedding last year, much to the delight of several very good French friends who happened to be in attendance. I believe it is the first time I’ve seen a Frenchman at a Scottish wedding attempting the French version of a ‘hauf an hauf’, in this case it was around a half pint of this cognac with half bottle of champagne… Colour: reddish mahogany. Nose: amazing freshness and pure old school richness. These properly ancient pre-phylloxera cognacs seem to possess a depth and rusticity that sets them apart from later eras, and that’s really the case here. Immediately and very precisely on cellar must, old dessert wines with fading acidity, powerful rancio character, many dark fruits, balsamic notes that almost go towards very old sherry and more of these impressions of strong, dark flower honey. Mouth: brilliant arrival, assertively on old mead, dried out old honeys, chestnut mushrooms, bouillon, umami seasonings, bone marrow gravy and bay leaf. A meal in a glass! And also very mulchy and deep tobacco notes. Roasted nuts, cassis, dark fruit cordials. Magnificent! Finish: medium to long, darkly fruity, gamey, rancio, wee hints of chocolate, dried mushroom and even some appley hints that nod towards equally ancient calvados. Comments: glad I opened this one.
SGP: 561 - 92 points. |
|
|
|
Cognac Grande Fine Champagne 1865 (Eschenauer & Co Bordeaux, circa 1950)
1865, definitely quite a long time ago, according to the Googlenet! Another bottle I bought at auction quite some years ago and decided to open recently. Colour: deep amber. Nose: sticky and velvety with prunes, molasses, dates, figs in syrup - a definite sense of sweetness or additive. Indeed, you get these further notes of sweet Demerara sugar and old rums. Also a lot of leaf mulch, old tobacco pouches, old pipes and quite a bit of rancio. Fun, but lacks the assertiveness, power and complexity of the Jousson. Mouth: you can immediately feel this is a lovely old Cognac that has been kind of drowned a bit in sugar and additives. Getting towards bitter caramelised brown sugars, sweet liquorice, sugary black tea and curious herbal liqueurs. Not a total disaster, but we’re some way away from the Jousson, once again. Finish: medium, sweet, herbal, on sugary extracted teas once again, plum jam, liquorice and blackcurrant wine. Comments: funny old stuff. Be careful, not all these old pre-phylloxera artefact bottles are amazing. Not a total disaster, but a good example of what happens when someone gets trigger happy with the sugar!
SGP: 531 - 78 points. |
|
|
Let’s return to Armagnac in an effort to end this session on a high… |
|
|
|
Domaine de Gaube 1929 (46%, Darroze, Bas Armagnac, +/- 1980)
Darroze was truly ahead of the game in these days and bottled many, many totally stunning old Armagnacs in true ind | | | | | |